大唾液腺多形性腺瘤:囊状形态与手术处理的关系研究。

A. Webb, J. Eveson
{"title":"大唾液腺多形性腺瘤:囊状形态与手术处理的关系研究。","authors":"A. Webb, J. Eveson","doi":"10.1046/J.1365-2273.2001.00440.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This was a retrospective study of 126 primary pleomorphic adenomas to correlate capsular characteristics with tumour histopathology in relation to current surgical debate (parotidectomy versus local excision). Capsular thickness was measured by micrometry and tumours classified into subtypes (1-4). Evidence of fine needle aspiration damage (needle tracks, infarction) was sought. Minimal changes were seen in eight tumours. Tumour growth features (bosselations, enveloping) were present in 57% and 33%, respectively, also microinvasion (42%) and tumour 'buds' (12%). Parotid lesions possessed thicker capsules than submandibular tumours. There was little correlation between capsular thickness and cellular structure. The significant exception was large (> 25 mm) hypocellular parotid tumours which had thinner capsules and could be vulnerable to operative rupture. In 110 standard operations (parotidectomy, submandibular gland excision), capsular exposure was evident in 81%. Field irrigation is recommended to lessen the risk of tumour seeding. This study reaffirms many elements of capsular weakness and suggests that parotidectomy is the operation of choice.","PeriodicalId":10694,"journal":{"name":"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences","volume":"2 1","pages":"134-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pleomorphic adenomas of the major salivary glands: a study of the capsular form in relation to surgical management.\",\"authors\":\"A. Webb, J. Eveson\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/J.1365-2273.2001.00440.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This was a retrospective study of 126 primary pleomorphic adenomas to correlate capsular characteristics with tumour histopathology in relation to current surgical debate (parotidectomy versus local excision). Capsular thickness was measured by micrometry and tumours classified into subtypes (1-4). Evidence of fine needle aspiration damage (needle tracks, infarction) was sought. Minimal changes were seen in eight tumours. Tumour growth features (bosselations, enveloping) were present in 57% and 33%, respectively, also microinvasion (42%) and tumour 'buds' (12%). Parotid lesions possessed thicker capsules than submandibular tumours. There was little correlation between capsular thickness and cellular structure. The significant exception was large (> 25 mm) hypocellular parotid tumours which had thinner capsules and could be vulnerable to operative rupture. In 110 standard operations (parotidectomy, submandibular gland excision), capsular exposure was evident in 81%. Field irrigation is recommended to lessen the risk of tumour seeding. This study reaffirms many elements of capsular weakness and suggests that parotidectomy is the operation of choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"134-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"64\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2273.2001.00440.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2273.2001.00440.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

摘要

这是一项对126例原发性多形性腺瘤的回顾性研究,目的是将包膜特征与肿瘤组织病理学之间的关系与当前手术争论(腮腺切除术还是局部切除术)联系起来。用显微法测量包膜厚度,并将肿瘤分类为亚型(1-4)。寻找细针穿刺损伤(针迹、梗死)的证据。在8个肿瘤中观察到微小的变化。肿瘤生长特征(隆起、包膜)分别占57%和33%,还有微侵袭(42%)和肿瘤“芽”(12%)。腮腺病变具有比下颌骨肿瘤更厚的囊。荚膜厚度与细胞结构的关系不大。明显的例外是大的(bbb25mm)腮腺低细胞肿瘤,其囊膜较薄,容易手术破裂。在110例标准手术(腮腺切除术、颌下腺切除术)中,有81%的患者有明显的囊膜暴露。建议田间灌溉以减少肿瘤播种的风险。本研究重申了包膜无力的许多因素,并建议腮腺切除术是首选手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pleomorphic adenomas of the major salivary glands: a study of the capsular form in relation to surgical management.
This was a retrospective study of 126 primary pleomorphic adenomas to correlate capsular characteristics with tumour histopathology in relation to current surgical debate (parotidectomy versus local excision). Capsular thickness was measured by micrometry and tumours classified into subtypes (1-4). Evidence of fine needle aspiration damage (needle tracks, infarction) was sought. Minimal changes were seen in eight tumours. Tumour growth features (bosselations, enveloping) were present in 57% and 33%, respectively, also microinvasion (42%) and tumour 'buds' (12%). Parotid lesions possessed thicker capsules than submandibular tumours. There was little correlation between capsular thickness and cellular structure. The significant exception was large (> 25 mm) hypocellular parotid tumours which had thinner capsules and could be vulnerable to operative rupture. In 110 standard operations (parotidectomy, submandibular gland excision), capsular exposure was evident in 81%. Field irrigation is recommended to lessen the risk of tumour seeding. This study reaffirms many elements of capsular weakness and suggests that parotidectomy is the operation of choice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信