黑格尔逻辑科学中的主观目的与工具理性

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sergio Montecinos Fabio
{"title":"黑格尔逻辑科学中的主观目的与工具理性","authors":"Sergio Montecinos Fabio","doi":"10.32735/s0718-2201201900049751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to show that, in the Science of Logic Hegel, through the category of “subjective end”, distinguishes a purely instrumental dimension of the activity of concept. After delineating a general interpretation of the Doctrine of Concept, key aspects of the chapter dedicated of Teleology are re-constructed with the aim of detecting both the fundamental features and the limitations of this purely instrumental dimension of the concept. It is concluded that, in the chapter, it is possible to verify a ‘logic of the instrumentally activity’ and from this standpoint, to interpret the systematic position of the chapter. In addition, critical features of the Hegelian analysis are emphasized in regard to the general problem of mechanization and wear of the world and life, which projects the problem to the transit from chapter on Teleology to the Idea section.","PeriodicalId":43217,"journal":{"name":"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia","volume":"1933 1","pages":"207-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fin subjetivo y razón instrumental en Ciencia de la lógica de Hegel\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Montecinos Fabio\",\"doi\":\"10.32735/s0718-2201201900049751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper seeks to show that, in the Science of Logic Hegel, through the category of “subjective end”, distinguishes a purely instrumental dimension of the activity of concept. After delineating a general interpretation of the Doctrine of Concept, key aspects of the chapter dedicated of Teleology are re-constructed with the aim of detecting both the fundamental features and the limitations of this purely instrumental dimension of the concept. It is concluded that, in the chapter, it is possible to verify a ‘logic of the instrumentally activity’ and from this standpoint, to interpret the systematic position of the chapter. In addition, critical features of the Hegelian analysis are emphasized in regard to the general problem of mechanization and wear of the world and life, which projects the problem to the transit from chapter on Teleology to the Idea section.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia\",\"volume\":\"1933 1\",\"pages\":\"207-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-2201201900049751\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-2201201900049751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图表明,在《逻辑学》中,黑格尔通过“主观目的”的范畴,区分了概念活动的纯粹工具维度。在描述了概念论的一般解释之后,目的论这一章的关键方面被重新构建,目的是发现概念的这个纯粹工具维度的基本特征和局限性。结论是,在本章中,有可能验证“工具活动的逻辑”,并从这个立场来解释本章的系统位置。此外,黑格尔分析的关键特征在世界和生命的机械化和磨损的一般问题上被强调,这将问题从目的论章节过渡到理念部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fin subjetivo y razón instrumental en Ciencia de la lógica de Hegel
This paper seeks to show that, in the Science of Logic Hegel, through the category of “subjective end”, distinguishes a purely instrumental dimension of the activity of concept. After delineating a general interpretation of the Doctrine of Concept, key aspects of the chapter dedicated of Teleology are re-constructed with the aim of detecting both the fundamental features and the limitations of this purely instrumental dimension of the concept. It is concluded that, in the chapter, it is possible to verify a ‘logic of the instrumentally activity’ and from this standpoint, to interpret the systematic position of the chapter. In addition, critical features of the Hegelian analysis are emphasized in regard to the general problem of mechanization and wear of the world and life, which projects the problem to the transit from chapter on Teleology to the Idea section.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia
Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信