Anja Skroblin, Tracy Carboon, Gladys Bidu, Muuki Taylor, Ngamaru Bidu, Waka Taylor, Karnu Taylor, Minyawu Miller, Leah Robinson, Carol Williams, Nganjapayi Chapman, Mulyatingki Marney, Carl Marney, Jakayu Biljabu, Levina Biljabu, Pamela Jeffries, Heather Samson, Phillipa Charles, Edward T. Game, Brendan Wintle
{"title":"为西澳大利亚西部沙漠的曼卡尔(大兔耳袋狸)制定双向学习监测计划","authors":"Anja Skroblin, Tracy Carboon, Gladys Bidu, Muuki Taylor, Ngamaru Bidu, Waka Taylor, Karnu Taylor, Minyawu Miller, Leah Robinson, Carol Williams, Nganjapayi Chapman, Mulyatingki Marney, Carl Marney, Jakayu Biljabu, Levina Biljabu, Pamela Jeffries, Heather Samson, Phillipa Charles, Edward T. Game, Brendan Wintle","doi":"10.1111/emr.12543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Indigenous people are the custodians of knowledge systems that hold detailed awareness of the environment, including applications for monitoring and management to improve biodiversity and cultural outcomes. Indigenous communities are increasingly participating in programs to monitor populations of wildlife. There is a need for frameworks to guide how Indigenous priorities, aspirations and culture can be respected within monitoring programs, as well as case studies that demonstrate how Indigenous knowledge and practice can provide opportunities together with Western science practice to improve the rigour and outcomes of wildlife monitoring. Here, we describe the process of developing a monitoring program that was tailored to be carried out by Kanyirninpa Jukurrpa Indigenous ranger teams to assess the status, trend and response to the management of a threatened and culturally significant species <i>Mankarr</i> (Greater Bilby; <i>Macrotis lagotis</i>). We applied a collaborative two-way approach, using iterative consultations, elicitations and field trials involving Indigenous and non-Indigenous project partners to define monitoring objectives, record biocultural knowledge and tailor a sampling methodology to fit the requirements of Martu Traditional Owners. Our project focused on creating a method that would be engaging, accessible and useful for rangers who would carry out the program, and prioritized collection of relevant data for community decision-making regarding management. We outline our key learnings for co-design of wildlife monitoring programs on Indigenous lands. Our approach provides insights that will assist in designing other cross-cultural or participatory monitoring programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"23 S1","pages":"129-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.12543","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a two-way learning monitoring program for Mankarr (Greater Bilby) in the Western Desert, Western Australia\",\"authors\":\"Anja Skroblin, Tracy Carboon, Gladys Bidu, Muuki Taylor, Ngamaru Bidu, Waka Taylor, Karnu Taylor, Minyawu Miller, Leah Robinson, Carol Williams, Nganjapayi Chapman, Mulyatingki Marney, Carl Marney, Jakayu Biljabu, Levina Biljabu, Pamela Jeffries, Heather Samson, Phillipa Charles, Edward T. Game, Brendan Wintle\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emr.12543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Indigenous people are the custodians of knowledge systems that hold detailed awareness of the environment, including applications for monitoring and management to improve biodiversity and cultural outcomes. Indigenous communities are increasingly participating in programs to monitor populations of wildlife. There is a need for frameworks to guide how Indigenous priorities, aspirations and culture can be respected within monitoring programs, as well as case studies that demonstrate how Indigenous knowledge and practice can provide opportunities together with Western science practice to improve the rigour and outcomes of wildlife monitoring. Here, we describe the process of developing a monitoring program that was tailored to be carried out by Kanyirninpa Jukurrpa Indigenous ranger teams to assess the status, trend and response to the management of a threatened and culturally significant species <i>Mankarr</i> (Greater Bilby; <i>Macrotis lagotis</i>). We applied a collaborative two-way approach, using iterative consultations, elicitations and field trials involving Indigenous and non-Indigenous project partners to define monitoring objectives, record biocultural knowledge and tailor a sampling methodology to fit the requirements of Martu Traditional Owners. Our project focused on creating a method that would be engaging, accessible and useful for rangers who would carry out the program, and prioritized collection of relevant data for community decision-making regarding management. We outline our key learnings for co-design of wildlife monitoring programs on Indigenous lands. Our approach provides insights that will assist in designing other cross-cultural or participatory monitoring programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"volume\":\"23 S1\",\"pages\":\"129-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.12543\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12543\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing a two-way learning monitoring program for Mankarr (Greater Bilby) in the Western Desert, Western Australia
Indigenous people are the custodians of knowledge systems that hold detailed awareness of the environment, including applications for monitoring and management to improve biodiversity and cultural outcomes. Indigenous communities are increasingly participating in programs to monitor populations of wildlife. There is a need for frameworks to guide how Indigenous priorities, aspirations and culture can be respected within monitoring programs, as well as case studies that demonstrate how Indigenous knowledge and practice can provide opportunities together with Western science practice to improve the rigour and outcomes of wildlife monitoring. Here, we describe the process of developing a monitoring program that was tailored to be carried out by Kanyirninpa Jukurrpa Indigenous ranger teams to assess the status, trend and response to the management of a threatened and culturally significant species Mankarr (Greater Bilby; Macrotis lagotis). We applied a collaborative two-way approach, using iterative consultations, elicitations and field trials involving Indigenous and non-Indigenous project partners to define monitoring objectives, record biocultural knowledge and tailor a sampling methodology to fit the requirements of Martu Traditional Owners. Our project focused on creating a method that would be engaging, accessible and useful for rangers who would carry out the program, and prioritized collection of relevant data for community decision-making regarding management. We outline our key learnings for co-design of wildlife monitoring programs on Indigenous lands. Our approach provides insights that will assist in designing other cross-cultural or participatory monitoring programs.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world.
Topic areas:
Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.