为什么测试?你为什么要为此付出代价?

H. Wainer, Daniel Robinson
{"title":"为什么测试?你为什么要为此付出代价?","authors":"H. Wainer, Daniel Robinson","doi":"10.1080/09332480.2023.2179281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The authors of this essay consider the costs of the errors that occur in any kind of decision making. In a binary decision there are always two kinds of errors that can be made – saying ‘yes’ when you should have said ‘no’ (a false positive) or saying ‘no’ when you should have said ‘yes’ (a false negative). Choosing a decision-making strategy by simply adding up the number of each of two kinds of errors is only sensible if the costs of each of the two errors are equal. This is rarely the case. The authors explore these ideas in the context of college admission and testing.","PeriodicalId":88226,"journal":{"name":"Chance (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"84 10 1","pages":"48 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Testing? Why Should It Cost You?\",\"authors\":\"H. Wainer, Daniel Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09332480.2023.2179281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The authors of this essay consider the costs of the errors that occur in any kind of decision making. In a binary decision there are always two kinds of errors that can be made – saying ‘yes’ when you should have said ‘no’ (a false positive) or saying ‘no’ when you should have said ‘yes’ (a false negative). Choosing a decision-making strategy by simply adding up the number of each of two kinds of errors is only sensible if the costs of each of the two errors are equal. This is rarely the case. The authors explore these ideas in the context of college admission and testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chance (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"84 10 1\",\"pages\":\"48 - 52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chance (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2023.2179281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chance (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2023.2179281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的作者考虑了在任何一种决策中发生的错误的成本。在二元决策中,总是会犯两种错误——当你应该说“不”的时候说“是”(误报),或者当你应该说“是”的时候说“不”(误报)。只有当两种错误的代价相等时,通过简单地将两种错误的数量相加来选择决策策略才是明智的。这种情况很少发生。作者在大学录取和考试的背景下探讨了这些想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Testing? Why Should It Cost You?
Abstract The authors of this essay consider the costs of the errors that occur in any kind of decision making. In a binary decision there are always two kinds of errors that can be made – saying ‘yes’ when you should have said ‘no’ (a false positive) or saying ‘no’ when you should have said ‘yes’ (a false negative). Choosing a decision-making strategy by simply adding up the number of each of two kinds of errors is only sensible if the costs of each of the two errors are equal. This is rarely the case. The authors explore these ideas in the context of college admission and testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信