中国、印度、马来西亚和越南的法律细分

IF 2.8 4区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

International Labour Review Pub Date : 2022-01-12 DOI:10.1111/ilr.12349

Sean COONEY

{"title":"中国、印度、马来西亚和越南的法律细分","authors":"Sean COONEY","doi":"10.1111/ilr.12349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article applies a qualitative approach to the legal segmentation analysis developed by Dingeldey et al. (2021), considering exclusion from, and hierarchies of, worker protection. Examining the cases of China, India, Malaysia and Viet Nam, the author finds that several factors distinguish these countries from those in the global North and produce distinct labour market outcomes, namely: in terms of the relative size of the workforce operating outside the effective coverage of employment regulation; legal terminology that is not readily translated into Western languages; and legal history, especially as regards the mismatch between statutory frameworks and the labour market resulting from colonialism.</p>","PeriodicalId":47216,"journal":{"name":"International Labour Review","volume":"161 4","pages":"573-591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal segmentation in China, India, Malaysia and Viet Nam\",\"authors\":\"Sean COONEY\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ilr.12349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article applies a qualitative approach to the legal segmentation analysis developed by Dingeldey et al. (2021), considering exclusion from, and hierarchies of, worker protection. Examining the cases of China, India, Malaysia and Viet Nam, the author finds that several factors distinguish these countries from those in the global North and produce distinct labour market outcomes, namely: in terms of the relative size of the workforce operating outside the effective coverage of employment regulation; legal terminology that is not readily translated into Western languages; and legal history, especially as regards the mismatch between statutory frameworks and the labour market resulting from colonialism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Labour Review\",\"volume\":\"161 4\",\"pages\":\"573-591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Labour Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12349\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labour Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

本文将定性方法应用于Dingeldey等人(2021)开发的法律分割分析，考虑到工人保护的排除和层次结构。通过研究中国、印度、马来西亚和越南的案例，作者发现，有几个因素将这些国家与全球北方国家区分开来，并产生不同的劳动力市场结果，即:在就业监管有效覆盖范围之外工作的劳动力的相对规模方面;不容易翻译成西方语言的法律术语;以及法律史，尤其是法律框架与殖民主义导致的劳动力市场之间的不匹配。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Legal segmentation in China, India, Malaysia and Viet Nam

This article applies a qualitative approach to the legal segmentation analysis developed by Dingeldey et al. (2021), considering exclusion from, and hierarchies of, worker protection. Examining the cases of China, India, Malaysia and Viet Nam, the author finds that several factors distinguish these countries from those in the global North and produce distinct labour market outcomes, namely: in terms of the relative size of the workforce operating outside the effective coverage of employment regulation; legal terminology that is not readily translated into Western languages; and legal history, especially as regards the mismatch between statutory frameworks and the labour market resulting from colonialism.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Labour Review Multiple-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.