不同牙本质桩治疗乳牙前牙的疗效(体外研究)

Mennatallah El-Shaabany, Ghada El-Baz, shaimaa Mahfouz Omer
{"title":"不同牙本质桩治疗乳牙前牙的疗效(体外研究)","authors":"Mennatallah El-Shaabany, Ghada El-Baz, shaimaa Mahfouz Omer","doi":"10.21608/dsu.2021.58163.1059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Early childhood Caries is a distressing situation for patients and parents and pediatric dentists. Aim: current research was carried out to evaluate fracture resistance and bond strength for different types of dentin posts compared to fiber posts. Materials and Methods: This Current in-vitro study was conducted on 48 extracted primary incisors. Samples were split randomly into 4 groups of 12 for each group. Group-I (fiber posts 6mm length, 1.4mm diameter), Group-II (dentin posts 6mm length, 1.4 diameter), Group-III (dentin posts 8mm length, 1.4mm diameter), Group-IV (dentin posts 8mm length, 1.6mm diameter). Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups (6 for the Push-Out bond strength test and 6 for the fracture resistance test using Universal Testing Machine). Results: It was observed in the fracture resistance test that, Group III showed the highest fracture resistance means (140.678±11.98) followed by Group IV (131.38±7.03), Group-II (94.23±9.84), and finally Group-I that showed the lowest fracture resistance means (80.465±2.82). Push-Out bond strength test revealed that the highest mean value with Group-IV (8.653±1.49), followed by Group-II (6.08±2.25) and Group III (5.67±2.44) have no statistically significant difference between them, while the lowest mean value was for Group-I. Conclusions: Dentin posts showed increased fracture resistance and bond strength more than fiber posts. The use of dentin post as intra-canal retention in primary anterior teeth possesses the most important advantages over the fiber post. Therefore, biological dentin post is a successful alternative for fiber post. INTRODUCTION Crown damage of primary anterior teeth is a frequent issue in pediatrics dental clinics because of either early childhood caries (ECC) or trauma (1). ECC is a quickly progressing developing type of dental caries that occurs primarily in the cervical third of maxillary incisors till full damage of the crown. It principally affects the primary maxillary incisors shortly following the eruption of teeth and infects other primary teeth quickly causing early tooth loss (2). In primary teeth, gaining intracanal retention through posts is tricky due to that permanent teeth need to find a way for primary counterparts. To ensure well-timed eruption of permanent successors in normal undeflected places, the intracanal post would timely resorb way (3). DOI: 10.21608/dsu.2021.58163.1059 Manuscript ID: DSU-2101-1059","PeriodicalId":11270,"journal":{"name":"Dental Science Updates","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Different Dentin Posts for the Treatment of Primary Anterior Teeth (An In vitro study)\",\"authors\":\"Mennatallah El-Shaabany, Ghada El-Baz, shaimaa Mahfouz Omer\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/dsu.2021.58163.1059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Early childhood Caries is a distressing situation for patients and parents and pediatric dentists. Aim: current research was carried out to evaluate fracture resistance and bond strength for different types of dentin posts compared to fiber posts. Materials and Methods: This Current in-vitro study was conducted on 48 extracted primary incisors. Samples were split randomly into 4 groups of 12 for each group. Group-I (fiber posts 6mm length, 1.4mm diameter), Group-II (dentin posts 6mm length, 1.4 diameter), Group-III (dentin posts 8mm length, 1.4mm diameter), Group-IV (dentin posts 8mm length, 1.6mm diameter). Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups (6 for the Push-Out bond strength test and 6 for the fracture resistance test using Universal Testing Machine). Results: It was observed in the fracture resistance test that, Group III showed the highest fracture resistance means (140.678±11.98) followed by Group IV (131.38±7.03), Group-II (94.23±9.84), and finally Group-I that showed the lowest fracture resistance means (80.465±2.82). Push-Out bond strength test revealed that the highest mean value with Group-IV (8.653±1.49), followed by Group-II (6.08±2.25) and Group III (5.67±2.44) have no statistically significant difference between them, while the lowest mean value was for Group-I. Conclusions: Dentin posts showed increased fracture resistance and bond strength more than fiber posts. The use of dentin post as intra-canal retention in primary anterior teeth possesses the most important advantages over the fiber post. Therefore, biological dentin post is a successful alternative for fiber post. INTRODUCTION Crown damage of primary anterior teeth is a frequent issue in pediatrics dental clinics because of either early childhood caries (ECC) or trauma (1). ECC is a quickly progressing developing type of dental caries that occurs primarily in the cervical third of maxillary incisors till full damage of the crown. It principally affects the primary maxillary incisors shortly following the eruption of teeth and infects other primary teeth quickly causing early tooth loss (2). In primary teeth, gaining intracanal retention through posts is tricky due to that permanent teeth need to find a way for primary counterparts. To ensure well-timed eruption of permanent successors in normal undeflected places, the intracanal post would timely resorb way (3). DOI: 10.21608/dsu.2021.58163.1059 Manuscript ID: DSU-2101-1059\",\"PeriodicalId\":11270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Science Updates\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Science Updates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2021.58163.1059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Science Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2021.58163.1059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

儿童早期龋齿是一个令人痛苦的情况,为患者和家长和儿科牙医。目的:比较不同类型牙本质桩与纤维桩的抗折性和粘结强度。材料与方法:本实验对48个拔除的上切牙进行体外实验。样本随机分为4组,每组12人。第一组(纤维桩长6mm,直径1.4mm),第二组(牙本质桩长6mm,直径1.4mm),第三组(牙本质桩长8mm,直径1.4mm),第四组(牙本质桩长8mm,直径1.6mm)。每组进一步细分为两个子组(6个用于推出粘结强度试验,6个用于使用万能试验机进行抗断裂试验)。结果:在抗断性测试中,III组的抗断性均值最高(140.678±11.98),其次是IV组(131.38±7.03),ii组(94.23±9.84),最后是i组,抗断性均值最低(80.465±2.82)。推出粘结强度试验结果显示,iv组平均值最高(8.653±1.49),ii组次之(6.08±2.25),III组平均值最低(5.67±2.44),两组间差异无统计学意义。结论:牙本质桩比纤维桩具有更强的抗折性和粘结强度。牙本质桩作为初级前牙的管内固位,比纤维桩具有更重要的优点。因此,生物牙本质桩是一种成功的替代纤维桩的方法。由于儿童早期龋齿(ECC)或创伤,初级前牙冠损伤是儿科牙科诊所常见的问题(1)。ECC是一种快速发展的龋齿类型,主要发生在上颌切牙的颈三分之一,直到冠完全损伤。它主要在乳牙长出后不久影响上颌切牙,并迅速感染其他乳牙,导致早期牙齿脱落(2)。在乳牙中,通过牙柱获得管内固位是很棘手的,因为恒牙需要为乳牙找到合适的方法。为了确保在正常未偏转的地方及时喷发永久继承者,肛管内岗位将及时吸收(3)。DOI: 10.21608/dsu.2021.58163.1059手稿ID: DSU-2101-1059
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Different Dentin Posts for the Treatment of Primary Anterior Teeth (An In vitro study)
Introduction: Early childhood Caries is a distressing situation for patients and parents and pediatric dentists. Aim: current research was carried out to evaluate fracture resistance and bond strength for different types of dentin posts compared to fiber posts. Materials and Methods: This Current in-vitro study was conducted on 48 extracted primary incisors. Samples were split randomly into 4 groups of 12 for each group. Group-I (fiber posts 6mm length, 1.4mm diameter), Group-II (dentin posts 6mm length, 1.4 diameter), Group-III (dentin posts 8mm length, 1.4mm diameter), Group-IV (dentin posts 8mm length, 1.6mm diameter). Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups (6 for the Push-Out bond strength test and 6 for the fracture resistance test using Universal Testing Machine). Results: It was observed in the fracture resistance test that, Group III showed the highest fracture resistance means (140.678±11.98) followed by Group IV (131.38±7.03), Group-II (94.23±9.84), and finally Group-I that showed the lowest fracture resistance means (80.465±2.82). Push-Out bond strength test revealed that the highest mean value with Group-IV (8.653±1.49), followed by Group-II (6.08±2.25) and Group III (5.67±2.44) have no statistically significant difference between them, while the lowest mean value was for Group-I. Conclusions: Dentin posts showed increased fracture resistance and bond strength more than fiber posts. The use of dentin post as intra-canal retention in primary anterior teeth possesses the most important advantages over the fiber post. Therefore, biological dentin post is a successful alternative for fiber post. INTRODUCTION Crown damage of primary anterior teeth is a frequent issue in pediatrics dental clinics because of either early childhood caries (ECC) or trauma (1). ECC is a quickly progressing developing type of dental caries that occurs primarily in the cervical third of maxillary incisors till full damage of the crown. It principally affects the primary maxillary incisors shortly following the eruption of teeth and infects other primary teeth quickly causing early tooth loss (2). In primary teeth, gaining intracanal retention through posts is tricky due to that permanent teeth need to find a way for primary counterparts. To ensure well-timed eruption of permanent successors in normal undeflected places, the intracanal post would timely resorb way (3). DOI: 10.21608/dsu.2021.58163.1059 Manuscript ID: DSU-2101-1059
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信