不同类型体能训练对体操运动员跳高的影响:元分析

IF 0.3 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Paul Ulloa-Sánchez, Jessenia Hernández Elizondo
{"title":"不同类型体能训练对体操运动员跳高的影响:元分析","authors":"Paul Ulloa-Sánchez, Jessenia Hernández Elizondo","doi":"10.15517/PENSARMOV.V19I1.43155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of the present study was to determine the effect of different types of physical training on the jumping height of gymnasts, under the meta-analysis methodology. The PRISMA guidelines were followed, the electronic databases consulted in the search were EBSCOhost (SPORTDiscus, MEDLINE, Academic Search Complete, E-Journals, OmniFile Full Text Select (HW Wilson), Web of Science, Scopus, SciencDirect, Research Gate and Pubmed to identify relevant articles that investigated the application of physical training and evaluated jump height in gymnasts before and after the intervention. After the study selection process and based on the inclusion criteria, 29 individual studies were coded and coded 157 individual effect sizes (TE). The total sample of subjects was 688 gymnasts. The experimental group showed a global TE of low to moderate and significant (TE = 0.33, p <0.001 *). A significant difference was evidenced (p = p <0.001 *) between the types of training; Post Hoc analysis showed that the global TE of plyometrics training (TE = 0.85, p <0.001 *) was higher than that of stretching. or (TE = -0.07, p = 0.56) and “others” (TE = 0.48, p <0.001 *), but not to vibration (TE = 0.54, p <0.001 *); furthermore, the overall stretch type TE was significantly lower than all types of training. It was concluded that the type of training that showed the highest overall TE was plyometrics, followed by vibrational platform training. Stretching does not appear to be significantly related to gymnasts' jumping height.","PeriodicalId":40746,"journal":{"name":"Pensar en Movimiento-Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio y la Salud","volume":"308 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efecto de diferentes tipos de entrenamiento físico en la altura de salto de gimnastas: meta-análisis\",\"authors\":\"Paul Ulloa-Sánchez, Jessenia Hernández Elizondo\",\"doi\":\"10.15517/PENSARMOV.V19I1.43155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main objective of the present study was to determine the effect of different types of physical training on the jumping height of gymnasts, under the meta-analysis methodology. The PRISMA guidelines were followed, the electronic databases consulted in the search were EBSCOhost (SPORTDiscus, MEDLINE, Academic Search Complete, E-Journals, OmniFile Full Text Select (HW Wilson), Web of Science, Scopus, SciencDirect, Research Gate and Pubmed to identify relevant articles that investigated the application of physical training and evaluated jump height in gymnasts before and after the intervention. After the study selection process and based on the inclusion criteria, 29 individual studies were coded and coded 157 individual effect sizes (TE). The total sample of subjects was 688 gymnasts. The experimental group showed a global TE of low to moderate and significant (TE = 0.33, p <0.001 *). A significant difference was evidenced (p = p <0.001 *) between the types of training; Post Hoc analysis showed that the global TE of plyometrics training (TE = 0.85, p <0.001 *) was higher than that of stretching. or (TE = -0.07, p = 0.56) and “others” (TE = 0.48, p <0.001 *), but not to vibration (TE = 0.54, p <0.001 *); furthermore, the overall stretch type TE was significantly lower than all types of training. It was concluded that the type of training that showed the highest overall TE was plyometrics, followed by vibrational platform training. Stretching does not appear to be significantly related to gymnasts' jumping height.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pensar en Movimiento-Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio y la Salud\",\"volume\":\"308 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pensar en Movimiento-Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio y la Salud\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15517/PENSARMOV.V19I1.43155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pensar en Movimiento-Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio y la Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/PENSARMOV.V19I1.43155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是采用元分析方法,确定不同类型的体育训练对体操运动员跳高的影响。遵循PRISMA指南,检索电子数据库为EBSCOhost (SPORTDiscus、MEDLINE、Academic search Complete、E-Journals、OmniFile全文选择(HW Wilson)、Web of Science、Scopus、SciencDirect、Research Gate和Pubmed,检索调查体育训练应用和评价干预前后体操运动员跳高的相关文章。在研究选择过程之后,根据纳入标准,对29个个体研究进行编码,并对157个个体效应量(TE)进行编码。被试总数为688名体操运动员。试验组整体TE为低至中等且显著(TE = 0.33, p <0.001 *)。训练类型之间有显著差异(p = p <0.001 *);事后分析显示,增强训练的整体TE (TE = 0.85, p <0.001 *)高于拉伸训练。或(TE = -0.07, p = 0.56)和“其他”(TE = 0.48, p <0.001 *),但不振动(TE = 0.54, p <0.001 *);此外,整体拉伸型TE显著低于所有类型的训练。结果表明,总体TE最高的训练类型是增强训练,其次是振动平台训练。伸展运动与体操运动员的跳跃高度没有显著的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efecto de diferentes tipos de entrenamiento físico en la altura de salto de gimnastas: meta-análisis
The main objective of the present study was to determine the effect of different types of physical training on the jumping height of gymnasts, under the meta-analysis methodology. The PRISMA guidelines were followed, the electronic databases consulted in the search were EBSCOhost (SPORTDiscus, MEDLINE, Academic Search Complete, E-Journals, OmniFile Full Text Select (HW Wilson), Web of Science, Scopus, SciencDirect, Research Gate and Pubmed to identify relevant articles that investigated the application of physical training and evaluated jump height in gymnasts before and after the intervention. After the study selection process and based on the inclusion criteria, 29 individual studies were coded and coded 157 individual effect sizes (TE). The total sample of subjects was 688 gymnasts. The experimental group showed a global TE of low to moderate and significant (TE = 0.33, p <0.001 *). A significant difference was evidenced (p = p <0.001 *) between the types of training; Post Hoc analysis showed that the global TE of plyometrics training (TE = 0.85, p <0.001 *) was higher than that of stretching. or (TE = -0.07, p = 0.56) and “others” (TE = 0.48, p <0.001 *), but not to vibration (TE = 0.54, p <0.001 *); furthermore, the overall stretch type TE was significantly lower than all types of training. It was concluded that the type of training that showed the highest overall TE was plyometrics, followed by vibrational platform training. Stretching does not appear to be significantly related to gymnasts' jumping height.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信