猫口服和肌肉注射美托咪定的比较

O. B. Ansah, M. Raekallio, O. Vainio
{"title":"猫口服和肌肉注射美托咪定的比较","authors":"O. B. Ansah, M. Raekallio, O. Vainio","doi":"10.1111/J.1467-2995.1998.TB00168.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Medetomidine (200 μg/kg) was administered orally and, on a seperate occasion, im to 7 cats. Peak serum drug concentrations were reached more slowly after oral (43.6 ± 14.3 min) than after im administration (21.6 ± 10.0 min). The onset of sedation and recumbency lagged after oral administration. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 routes of administration in peak serum concentrations, systemic drug availability or extent of sedation. However, there was considerable variation in these parameters between individuals after oral administration. The extent of salivation correlated negatively with systemic drug availability after oral administration. Where excessive salivation did not occur, systemic drug availability and the depth of sedation were comparable to, or even higher than, were obtained after the corresponding im administrations. In conclusion, oral administration of medetomidine induced a clinical sedation but, when accurate dosing is a necessity, the oral route may not be very reliable due to possible drug losses through salivation.","PeriodicalId":100854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Anaesthesia","volume":"9 1","pages":"41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing oral and intramuscular administration of medetomidine in cats\",\"authors\":\"O. B. Ansah, M. Raekallio, O. Vainio\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1467-2995.1998.TB00168.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY Medetomidine (200 μg/kg) was administered orally and, on a seperate occasion, im to 7 cats. Peak serum drug concentrations were reached more slowly after oral (43.6 ± 14.3 min) than after im administration (21.6 ± 10.0 min). The onset of sedation and recumbency lagged after oral administration. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 routes of administration in peak serum concentrations, systemic drug availability or extent of sedation. However, there was considerable variation in these parameters between individuals after oral administration. The extent of salivation correlated negatively with systemic drug availability after oral administration. Where excessive salivation did not occur, systemic drug availability and the depth of sedation were comparable to, or even higher than, were obtained after the corresponding im administrations. In conclusion, oral administration of medetomidine induced a clinical sedation but, when accurate dosing is a necessity, the oral route may not be very reliable due to possible drug losses through salivation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"41-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-2995.1998.TB00168.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-2995.1998.TB00168.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

对7只猫口服美托咪定(200 μg/kg)。口服给药后(43.6±14.3 min)达到血药浓度峰值的速度慢于口服给药后(21.6±10.0 min)。口服给药后,镇静和平卧作用的起效滞后。两种给药方式在峰值血药浓度、全身药物可获得性和镇静程度上无统计学差异。然而,口服给药后,这些参数在个体之间有相当大的差异。口服给药后,唾液分泌程度与全身药物利用度呈负相关。在未发生过度流涎的情况下,全身药物可用性和镇静深度与相应给药后的结果相当,甚至更高。综上所述,口服美托咪定可诱导临床镇静,但当需要准确给药时,口服途径可能不太可靠,因为可能通过唾液流失药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing oral and intramuscular administration of medetomidine in cats
SUMMARY Medetomidine (200 μg/kg) was administered orally and, on a seperate occasion, im to 7 cats. Peak serum drug concentrations were reached more slowly after oral (43.6 ± 14.3 min) than after im administration (21.6 ± 10.0 min). The onset of sedation and recumbency lagged after oral administration. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 routes of administration in peak serum concentrations, systemic drug availability or extent of sedation. However, there was considerable variation in these parameters between individuals after oral administration. The extent of salivation correlated negatively with systemic drug availability after oral administration. Where excessive salivation did not occur, systemic drug availability and the depth of sedation were comparable to, or even higher than, were obtained after the corresponding im administrations. In conclusion, oral administration of medetomidine induced a clinical sedation but, when accurate dosing is a necessity, the oral route may not be very reliable due to possible drug losses through salivation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信