囊胚移植:克服胚胎选择缺陷的方法

Y. Sasabe, T. Nishimura, Kanako Hanaoka, Hikoyoshi Jinnai, Y. Shibui, Y. Katagiri, K. Masaki, Y. Abe, H. Kubo
{"title":"囊胚移植:克服胚胎选择缺陷的方法","authors":"Y. Sasabe, T. Nishimura, Kanako Hanaoka, Hikoyoshi Jinnai, Y. Shibui, Y. Katagiri, K. Masaki, Y. Abe, H. Kubo","doi":"10.1274/JMOR.20.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cleavage-stage embryos have been transferred to the uterus since the first successful in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Physiologically the embryos transferred to the uterus should be at the blastocyst stage, but cultivation to the blastocyst stage was difficult because of a poor culture environment. At the first attempt reported by Bolton et al. in 1989 [1] and 1991 [2] only 17% of embryos reached the expanded blastocyst stage and the implantation rate for blastocyst transfer (BT) was 7%. Subsequently, Menezo et al. [3] introduced a coculture system with Vero cells, with which 55(cid:150)60% of embryos reached the blastocyst stage. With the sequential medium, it is now possible to culture embryos to the blastocyst stage without feeder cells [4]. Gardner et al. [5] reported that the proportion of embryos reaching the blastocyst stage was 46.5% and the implantation rate for BT was 50.5%. Furthermore, their comparison study with conventional embryo transfer at the cleavage stage (ET) showed that the implantation rate for BT was much higher than that for ET [5].","PeriodicalId":90599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mammalian ova research","volume":"29 1","pages":"25-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blastocyst Transfer: Means of Overcoming Disadvantages Focused on Embryo Selection\",\"authors\":\"Y. Sasabe, T. Nishimura, Kanako Hanaoka, Hikoyoshi Jinnai, Y. Shibui, Y. Katagiri, K. Masaki, Y. Abe, H. Kubo\",\"doi\":\"10.1274/JMOR.20.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cleavage-stage embryos have been transferred to the uterus since the first successful in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Physiologically the embryos transferred to the uterus should be at the blastocyst stage, but cultivation to the blastocyst stage was difficult because of a poor culture environment. At the first attempt reported by Bolton et al. in 1989 [1] and 1991 [2] only 17% of embryos reached the expanded blastocyst stage and the implantation rate for blastocyst transfer (BT) was 7%. Subsequently, Menezo et al. [3] introduced a coculture system with Vero cells, with which 55(cid:150)60% of embryos reached the blastocyst stage. With the sequential medium, it is now possible to culture embryos to the blastocyst stage without feeder cells [4]. Gardner et al. [5] reported that the proportion of embryos reaching the blastocyst stage was 46.5% and the implantation rate for BT was 50.5%. Furthermore, their comparison study with conventional embryo transfer at the cleavage stage (ET) showed that the implantation rate for BT was much higher than that for ET [5].\",\"PeriodicalId\":90599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of mammalian ova research\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"25-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of mammalian ova research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1274/JMOR.20.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mammalian ova research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1274/JMOR.20.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自第一次成功的体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)以来,卵裂期胚胎已被转移到子宫。从生理上讲,移植到子宫的胚胎应处于囊胚期,但由于培养环境较差,很难培养到囊胚期。Bolton等人在1989年[1]和1991年[2]报道的第一次尝试中,只有17%的胚胎达到膨大囊胚期,囊胚移植着床率(BT)为7%。随后,Menezo等人[3]引入了与Vero细胞共培养系统,其中55(cid:150)60%的胚胎达到囊胚期。使用顺序培养基,现在可以在没有饲养细胞的情况下将胚胎培养到囊胚期[4]。Gardner等[5]报道胚胎到达囊胚期的比例为46.5%,BT的着床率为50.5%。此外,他们与传统卵裂期(ET)胚胎移植的比较研究表明,BT的着床率远高于ET[5]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blastocyst Transfer: Means of Overcoming Disadvantages Focused on Embryo Selection
Cleavage-stage embryos have been transferred to the uterus since the first successful in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Physiologically the embryos transferred to the uterus should be at the blastocyst stage, but cultivation to the blastocyst stage was difficult because of a poor culture environment. At the first attempt reported by Bolton et al. in 1989 [1] and 1991 [2] only 17% of embryos reached the expanded blastocyst stage and the implantation rate for blastocyst transfer (BT) was 7%. Subsequently, Menezo et al. [3] introduced a coculture system with Vero cells, with which 55(cid:150)60% of embryos reached the blastocyst stage. With the sequential medium, it is now possible to culture embryos to the blastocyst stage without feeder cells [4]. Gardner et al. [5] reported that the proportion of embryos reaching the blastocyst stage was 46.5% and the implantation rate for BT was 50.5%. Furthermore, their comparison study with conventional embryo transfer at the cleavage stage (ET) showed that the implantation rate for BT was much higher than that for ET [5].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信