政府应对COVID-19的变异性和严谨性:宏观区域评估

Michael Donadelli , Ivan Gufler , Renatas Kizys , Marcella Lucchetta
{"title":"政府应对COVID-19的变异性和严谨性:宏观区域评估","authors":"Michael Donadelli ,&nbsp;Ivan Gufler ,&nbsp;Renatas Kizys ,&nbsp;Marcella Lucchetta","doi":"10.1016/j.jge.2022.100039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examine the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical government interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19. In particular, we focus on the impact of strictness and variability in government interventions on the reproduction rate (<span><math><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>t</mi></msub></math></span>) and the number of new deaths (per million of inhabitants) in five different world regions (G7, G20, EU28, Central America and Asia). In line with existing evidence, we observe that more stringent and frequent NPIs contributed to slow down contagion. Unfortunately, no benefits in terms of mortality are found. In fact, with few exceptions, both strictness and variability in NPIs are associated with a rise in the number of new deaths. This evidence is observed to be stronger among advanced economies and over the second pandemic wave. Take together, our research findings advocate early and decisive implementation of NPIs, but gradual and staggered relaxation of NPIs when the pandemic appears to recede.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Government and Economics","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319322000118/pdfft?md5=edcc96d9a9981d7826aaf16173630c79&pid=1-s2.0-S2667319322000118-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability and strictness in COVID-19 government response: A macro-regional assessment\",\"authors\":\"Michael Donadelli ,&nbsp;Ivan Gufler ,&nbsp;Renatas Kizys ,&nbsp;Marcella Lucchetta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jge.2022.100039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We examine the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical government interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19. In particular, we focus on the impact of strictness and variability in government interventions on the reproduction rate (<span><math><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>t</mi></msub></math></span>) and the number of new deaths (per million of inhabitants) in five different world regions (G7, G20, EU28, Central America and Asia). In line with existing evidence, we observe that more stringent and frequent NPIs contributed to slow down contagion. Unfortunately, no benefits in terms of mortality are found. In fact, with few exceptions, both strictness and variability in NPIs are associated with a rise in the number of new deaths. This evidence is observed to be stronger among advanced economies and over the second pandemic wave. Take together, our research findings advocate early and decisive implementation of NPIs, but gradual and staggered relaxation of NPIs when the pandemic appears to recede.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Government and Economics\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319322000118/pdfft?md5=edcc96d9a9981d7826aaf16173630c79&pid=1-s2.0-S2667319322000118-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Government and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319322000118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Government and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319322000118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们研究了非药物政府干预措施(npi)对COVID-19的有效性。我们特别关注政府干预措施的严格性和可变性对五个不同世界区域(七国集团、二十国集团、欧盟28国、中美洲和亚洲)的生育率(Rt)和新死亡人数(每百万居民)的影响。根据现有证据,我们观察到更严格和频繁的npi有助于减缓传染。不幸的是,在死亡率方面没有发现任何好处。事实上,除了少数例外,国家行动计划的严格性和可变性都与新死亡人数的增加有关。据观察,这一证据在发达经济体和第二波大流行中更为明显。总而言之,我们的研究结果主张尽早和果断地实施国家行动计划,但在疫情似乎消退时逐步和交错地放松国家行动计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variability and strictness in COVID-19 government response: A macro-regional assessment

We examine the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical government interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19. In particular, we focus on the impact of strictness and variability in government interventions on the reproduction rate (Rt) and the number of new deaths (per million of inhabitants) in five different world regions (G7, G20, EU28, Central America and Asia). In line with existing evidence, we observe that more stringent and frequent NPIs contributed to slow down contagion. Unfortunately, no benefits in terms of mortality are found. In fact, with few exceptions, both strictness and variability in NPIs are associated with a rise in the number of new deaths. This evidence is observed to be stronger among advanced economies and over the second pandemic wave. Take together, our research findings advocate early and decisive implementation of NPIs, but gradual and staggered relaxation of NPIs when the pandemic appears to recede.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信