传统方法和常规方法提取硅铁香精中电阻率与浓度的关系分析

Uhiara Ngozi Sunday, O. Gideon, Adesanya Oluwatosin Dorothy, Eduzor Esther, Anayo Gabriel Jacob, Adeosun Florence Funke
{"title":"传统方法和常规方法提取硅铁香精中电阻率与浓度的关系分析","authors":"Uhiara Ngozi Sunday, O. Gideon, Adesanya Oluwatosin Dorothy, Eduzor Esther, Anayo Gabriel Jacob, Adeosun Florence Funke","doi":"10.11648/J.IJNFS.20211001.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extract of basil leave were prepared by two different methods; modification of an African cultural practice where specified weights in grams (between 100 and 300) of (non blemished, dust free) fresh basil leaves were harvested stalk free and heated (incinerated) stuffed in a clay earthenpot on a charcoal stove for nine (9) hours. The partially charred leaves were discarded and the pot thoroughly washed with 300ml distilled water. Finally, 200ml of distilled water was poured into the pot, covered and allowed to stand for 12 hours, before storing the water at 4°C in tightly sealed plastic containers, labeled as subunits of sample A. In the second procedure, basil leaves collected as in the first procedure were in separate batches stuffed into the distillation bottle with 200ml of distilled water. Distillation was carried out for 2 hours and distillates collected and stored in tightly sealed plastic bottle labeled as subunits of sample B. The samples (A and B) including their subunits were (within 30 minutes of extraction) subjected to spectrophotometry, pH, and Total soluble solids (TSS) analysis. A 20 man trained panelist were employed in sensory evaluation of the (300g leaf) extracts (after storing at 4°C for 96hours) in terms of colour, flavour, flavour interference and general acceptability. Furthermore, 20ml of each (300g leaf) extract of Aand B were poured into a curvet of 2mm pathway. These were one after the other placed into an electric circuit with the poles submerged into opposite ends of the curvet. The following parameters were read from the meters when the circuit was completed: current, voltage and resistance to flow of electricity across the sample. Sample A (the extract made by the modified traditional practice) had the highest general acceptability compared to sample B and the natural leaf (control sample). It had significantly lower color and flavor interferences, with average of 8/10 flavor intensity recording. Resistance to flow of electricity for both samples (A and B), were inversely proportional to leaf orflavour extract concentration with a gradient of 0.001. It is therefore possible to compute concentrations of flavor components from resistance to flow of electricity with gradient and intercepts derived from graph (Figure 1). TSS, pH and temperature of samples followed the same pattern as electrical resistivity.","PeriodicalId":14174,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences","volume":"83 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assaying the Relationship Between Resistivity and Concentration in Ocimumgratissium Flavor Extracted by Traditional and Conventional Methods\",\"authors\":\"Uhiara Ngozi Sunday, O. Gideon, Adesanya Oluwatosin Dorothy, Eduzor Esther, Anayo Gabriel Jacob, Adeosun Florence Funke\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.IJNFS.20211001.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The extract of basil leave were prepared by two different methods; modification of an African cultural practice where specified weights in grams (between 100 and 300) of (non blemished, dust free) fresh basil leaves were harvested stalk free and heated (incinerated) stuffed in a clay earthenpot on a charcoal stove for nine (9) hours. The partially charred leaves were discarded and the pot thoroughly washed with 300ml distilled water. Finally, 200ml of distilled water was poured into the pot, covered and allowed to stand for 12 hours, before storing the water at 4°C in tightly sealed plastic containers, labeled as subunits of sample A. In the second procedure, basil leaves collected as in the first procedure were in separate batches stuffed into the distillation bottle with 200ml of distilled water. Distillation was carried out for 2 hours and distillates collected and stored in tightly sealed plastic bottle labeled as subunits of sample B. The samples (A and B) including their subunits were (within 30 minutes of extraction) subjected to spectrophotometry, pH, and Total soluble solids (TSS) analysis. A 20 man trained panelist were employed in sensory evaluation of the (300g leaf) extracts (after storing at 4°C for 96hours) in terms of colour, flavour, flavour interference and general acceptability. Furthermore, 20ml of each (300g leaf) extract of Aand B were poured into a curvet of 2mm pathway. These were one after the other placed into an electric circuit with the poles submerged into opposite ends of the curvet. The following parameters were read from the meters when the circuit was completed: current, voltage and resistance to flow of electricity across the sample. Sample A (the extract made by the modified traditional practice) had the highest general acceptability compared to sample B and the natural leaf (control sample). It had significantly lower color and flavor interferences, with average of 8/10 flavor intensity recording. Resistance to flow of electricity for both samples (A and B), were inversely proportional to leaf orflavour extract concentration with a gradient of 0.001. It is therefore possible to compute concentrations of flavor components from resistance to flow of electricity with gradient and intercepts derived from graph (Figure 1). TSS, pH and temperature of samples followed the same pattern as electrical resistivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJNFS.20211001.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJNFS.20211001.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用两种不同的方法制备罗勒叶提取物;对一种非洲文化习俗的修改,在这种习俗中,以克为单位(在100到300克之间)的(无瑕疵,无尘)新鲜罗勒叶被收割,无茎,并在木炭炉上的粘土陶罐中加热(焚烧)9小时。部分烧焦的叶子被丢弃,用300毫升蒸馏水彻底清洗锅。最后,将200ml蒸馏水倒入锅中,盖上盖子静置12小时,然后在4°C下将水储存在密封的塑料容器中,并标记为样品a的亚基。在第二步中,将与第一步中收集的罗勒叶分批次装入装有200ml蒸馏水的蒸馏瓶中。蒸馏2小时,将馏出物收集并储存在密封的塑料瓶中,标记为样品B的亚基。样品(A和B)及其亚基(提取后30分钟内)进行分光光度法、pH和总可溶性固形物(TSS)分析。一个20人的训练小组成员被雇用在感官评估(300克叶)提取物(在4°C储存96小时后)的颜色,味道,味道干扰和一般的可接受性。此外,将a和B的提取物各20ml (300g叶)倒入2mm路径的曲线中。它们一个接一个地放入电路中,杆子浸入曲线的两端。当电路完成时,从仪表上读取以下参数:电流,电压和通过样品的电流电阻。与样品B和天然叶子(对照样品)相比,样品A(经改良的传统做法提取的提取物)具有最高的一般可接受性。颜色和风味干扰显著降低,平均记录的风味强度为8/10。两个样品(A和B)的电流阻力与叶片或香精提取物浓度成反比,梯度为0.001。因此,有可能计算风味成分的浓度,从梯度和截距的电流阻力图(图1)。样品的TSS, pH和温度遵循与电阻率相同的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assaying the Relationship Between Resistivity and Concentration in Ocimumgratissium Flavor Extracted by Traditional and Conventional Methods
The extract of basil leave were prepared by two different methods; modification of an African cultural practice where specified weights in grams (between 100 and 300) of (non blemished, dust free) fresh basil leaves were harvested stalk free and heated (incinerated) stuffed in a clay earthenpot on a charcoal stove for nine (9) hours. The partially charred leaves were discarded and the pot thoroughly washed with 300ml distilled water. Finally, 200ml of distilled water was poured into the pot, covered and allowed to stand for 12 hours, before storing the water at 4°C in tightly sealed plastic containers, labeled as subunits of sample A. In the second procedure, basil leaves collected as in the first procedure were in separate batches stuffed into the distillation bottle with 200ml of distilled water. Distillation was carried out for 2 hours and distillates collected and stored in tightly sealed plastic bottle labeled as subunits of sample B. The samples (A and B) including their subunits were (within 30 minutes of extraction) subjected to spectrophotometry, pH, and Total soluble solids (TSS) analysis. A 20 man trained panelist were employed in sensory evaluation of the (300g leaf) extracts (after storing at 4°C for 96hours) in terms of colour, flavour, flavour interference and general acceptability. Furthermore, 20ml of each (300g leaf) extract of Aand B were poured into a curvet of 2mm pathway. These were one after the other placed into an electric circuit with the poles submerged into opposite ends of the curvet. The following parameters were read from the meters when the circuit was completed: current, voltage and resistance to flow of electricity across the sample. Sample A (the extract made by the modified traditional practice) had the highest general acceptability compared to sample B and the natural leaf (control sample). It had significantly lower color and flavor interferences, with average of 8/10 flavor intensity recording. Resistance to flow of electricity for both samples (A and B), were inversely proportional to leaf orflavour extract concentration with a gradient of 0.001. It is therefore possible to compute concentrations of flavor components from resistance to flow of electricity with gradient and intercepts derived from graph (Figure 1). TSS, pH and temperature of samples followed the same pattern as electrical resistivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信