穴位按压联合药物治疗膝关节骨关节炎患者:一项随机试验

IF 1.7 Q2 Medicine
Meenu Rani, Lokendra Sharma, Uma Advani
{"title":"穴位按压联合药物治疗膝关节骨关节炎患者:一项随机试验","authors":"Meenu Rani,&nbsp;Lokendra Sharma,&nbsp;Uma Advani","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2021.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><span>To test the effect of noninvasive self-performed acupressure therapy as an add-on to pharmacological treatment to manage knee main and to evaluate the improvement of pain due to intervention according to age and </span>body mass index.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In the study, 240 participants were assigned into three groups (1) KAP group (verum acupressure and pharmacological treatment) (2) Comparison Group 1 (sham acupressure and pharmacological treatment), and (3) Comparison Group 2 (pharmacological treatment only). Outcome measures were subscales of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index<span> (WOMAC), Visual analog scale and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey. Intention–to–treat analysis was used and missing data was deal with multiple imputation method. The general linear mixed model was carried out to assess the differences between the study groups at different durations (3 months, 6 months, and 1 year).</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with CG-1 and CG-2, participants of the KAP group reported considerable improvements in WOMAC pain (mean difference: −2.50 units; 95% CI, 3.74–1.25, and mean difference: −1.69 units; 95%CI, −3.24 to −0.13 respectively) at 1 year. Similarly, VAS pain, stiffness, and physical function were also improved among the participants of KAP group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Self-administered acupressure has an additive effect to the pharmacological treatment to improve pain, stiffness, and physical function as compared to pharmacological treatment only.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 30-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acupressure combined with pharmacological treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"Meenu Rani,&nbsp;Lokendra Sharma,&nbsp;Uma Advani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aimed.2021.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><span>To test the effect of noninvasive self-performed acupressure therapy as an add-on to pharmacological treatment to manage knee main and to evaluate the improvement of pain due to intervention according to age and </span>body mass index.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In the study, 240 participants were assigned into three groups (1) KAP group (verum acupressure and pharmacological treatment) (2) Comparison Group 1 (sham acupressure and pharmacological treatment), and (3) Comparison Group 2 (pharmacological treatment only). Outcome measures were subscales of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index<span> (WOMAC), Visual analog scale and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey. Intention–to–treat analysis was used and missing data was deal with multiple imputation method. The general linear mixed model was carried out to assess the differences between the study groups at different durations (3 months, 6 months, and 1 year).</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with CG-1 and CG-2, participants of the KAP group reported considerable improvements in WOMAC pain (mean difference: −2.50 units; 95% CI, 3.74–1.25, and mean difference: −1.69 units; 95%CI, −3.24 to −0.13 respectively) at 1 year. Similarly, VAS pain, stiffness, and physical function were also improved among the participants of KAP group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Self-administered acupressure has an additive effect to the pharmacological treatment to improve pain, stiffness, and physical function as compared to pharmacological treatment only.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in integrative medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 30-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in integrative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958821000860\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958821000860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的观察无创自行穴位按摩疗法在药物治疗的基础上治疗膝关节疼痛的效果,并根据年龄和体重指数评价干预后疼痛的改善情况。方法将240名受试者随机分为3组(1)KAP组(穴位按压加药物治疗)(2)比较1组(假穴位按压加药物治疗)和(3)比较2组(仅药物治疗)。结果测量采用西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)亚量表、视觉模拟量表和36项简短健康调查。采用意向处理分析,并用多重插值法处理缺失数据。采用一般线性混合模型评估研究组在不同持续时间(3个月、6个月和1年)的差异。结果与CG-1和CG-2相比,KAP组的参与者报告了WOMAC疼痛的显著改善(平均差异:−2.50单位;95% CI为3.74-1.25,平均差值为- 1.69个单位;95%CI,分别为- 3.24至- 0.13)。同样,KAP组VAS疼痛、僵硬和身体功能也得到改善。结论与单纯药物治疗相比,自我穴位按压对药物治疗有改善疼痛、僵硬和身体功能的附加作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acupressure combined with pharmacological treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized trial

Objectives

To test the effect of noninvasive self-performed acupressure therapy as an add-on to pharmacological treatment to manage knee main and to evaluate the improvement of pain due to intervention according to age and body mass index.

Methods

In the study, 240 participants were assigned into three groups (1) KAP group (verum acupressure and pharmacological treatment) (2) Comparison Group 1 (sham acupressure and pharmacological treatment), and (3) Comparison Group 2 (pharmacological treatment only). Outcome measures were subscales of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Visual analog scale and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey. Intention–to–treat analysis was used and missing data was deal with multiple imputation method. The general linear mixed model was carried out to assess the differences between the study groups at different durations (3 months, 6 months, and 1 year).

Results

Compared with CG-1 and CG-2, participants of the KAP group reported considerable improvements in WOMAC pain (mean difference: −2.50 units; 95% CI, 3.74–1.25, and mean difference: −1.69 units; 95%CI, −3.24 to −0.13 respectively) at 1 year. Similarly, VAS pain, stiffness, and physical function were also improved among the participants of KAP group.

Conclusion

Self-administered acupressure has an additive effect to the pharmacological treatment to improve pain, stiffness, and physical function as compared to pharmacological treatment only.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in integrative medicine
Advances in integrative medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信