{"title":"拉丁美洲环境史学的历史是什么?","authors":"Stefania Gallini","doi":"10.19053/20275137.NESPECIAL.2020.11586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanol ?Cuanto ha aportado el campo de la historia ambiental latinoamericana a la historiografia de la region?, ?que tanto le ha importado a la historiografia ambiental latinoamericana incidir en la historiografia de la region?, ?podria tejerse esta relacion con mayor provecho para ambas? Este escrito le habla al publico de la Historia desde una lectura critica de la historiografia ambiental latinoamericana. Sugiere que esta le ha indicado a la Historia la relevancia de una agencia historica mas amplia y compleja, pero a menudo se ha conformado con narrativas previsibles de limitado atractivo para historiadores sin intereses explicitos hacia la relacion entre sociedades y ecosistemas. Argumenta que, al entrar en los ultimos anos a una etapa mas madura, la historiografia ambiental latinoamericana ha abierto el camino hacia mejores preguntas sobre temas fundamentales de la historiografia latinoamericana, interrogantes y objetos que resultan renovadores tanto conceptual como metodologicamente. Aborda, a manera de ejemplos, los asuntos de la cuestion agraria y la construccion del Estado nacional, senalando sin embargo que persiste una necesidad de documentar y sistematizar mejor la metodologia de la historia ambiental. Las Conclusiones avanzan hacia la hipotesis de que el Antropoceno, como lugar de controversia epistemologica y de desafio metodologico, puede representar un terreno de contribucion original de la historia ambiental a la historiografia latinoamericana. EnglishHow much has environmental history contributed to the historiography of the region? How much has LatinAmerican environmental historiography contributed to the historiography of the region? Could this relationship be cultivated for the benefit of both? This text addresses the public and talks about history based on a critical reading of Latin American environmental historiography. It suggests that historiography has indicated history the relevance of a wider and more complex historical agency, but it has often been formed by predictable narratives of limited appeal to historians without explicit interests regarding therelationship between societies and ecosystems. It is argued that, when entering the last years of a more mature phase, Latin American environmental historiography has opened a door to better questions concerning fundamental topics of Latin American historiography, questions and objects which seem conceptually, as well as methodologically, innovative. The article presents, by means of examples, topics related with agrarian issues and the construction of the nation state, nonetheless, noting that there is a necessity to better document and systematize the methodology of environmental history. The conclusions move towards the hypothesis that the Anthropocene, as a place of epistemological controversy and methodological challenge, may represent a territory of original contribution by environmental history to Latin American historiography. francaisQuels ont ete les apports de l’histoire environnementale latinoamericaine a l’historiographie de cette region? A quel point l’historiographie environnementale latino-americaine a voulu influencer l’historiographie de la region? Cet article reflechit sur l’histoire a partir d’une lecture critique de l’historiographie environnementale latino-americaine. On affirme ici que celleci montre a l’histoire l’importance d’une agence historique plus large et plus complexe, meme si elle se contente souvent d’apportes des narratives previsibles et peu ttirantes pour les historiens qui ne sont pas forcement interesses par le rapport entre les societes et les ecosystemes. Par ailleurs, l’historiographie environnementale latino-americaine a ouvert recemment la voie pour des questions concernant les problemes fondamentaux de l’historiographie latinoamericaine,des questions qui constituent une renovation et conceptuelle et methodologique. Par exemple, il estquestion ici du probleme agricole et de la construction de l’Etat national, tout en signalant qu’il faut mieux systematiser la methodologie de l’histoire environnementale. Enfin, on conclut que l’anthropocene en tant que sujet de controverse epistemologique et defi ecologique, peut donner lieu a un ensemble de contributions de l’histoire environnementale a l’histoire latino-americaine. ecosystemes. Par ailleurs,l’historiographie environnementale latino-americaine aouvert recemment la voie pour des questions concernant","PeriodicalId":41990,"journal":{"name":"Historia y Memoria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿Qué hay de histórico en la Historiografía ambiental en América Latina?\",\"authors\":\"Stefania Gallini\",\"doi\":\"10.19053/20275137.NESPECIAL.2020.11586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanol ?Cuanto ha aportado el campo de la historia ambiental latinoamericana a la historiografia de la region?, ?que tanto le ha importado a la historiografia ambiental latinoamericana incidir en la historiografia de la region?, ?podria tejerse esta relacion con mayor provecho para ambas? Este escrito le habla al publico de la Historia desde una lectura critica de la historiografia ambiental latinoamericana. Sugiere que esta le ha indicado a la Historia la relevancia de una agencia historica mas amplia y compleja, pero a menudo se ha conformado con narrativas previsibles de limitado atractivo para historiadores sin intereses explicitos hacia la relacion entre sociedades y ecosistemas. Argumenta que, al entrar en los ultimos anos a una etapa mas madura, la historiografia ambiental latinoamericana ha abierto el camino hacia mejores preguntas sobre temas fundamentales de la historiografia latinoamericana, interrogantes y objetos que resultan renovadores tanto conceptual como metodologicamente. Aborda, a manera de ejemplos, los asuntos de la cuestion agraria y la construccion del Estado nacional, senalando sin embargo que persiste una necesidad de documentar y sistematizar mejor la metodologia de la historia ambiental. Las Conclusiones avanzan hacia la hipotesis de que el Antropoceno, como lugar de controversia epistemologica y de desafio metodologico, puede representar un terreno de contribucion original de la historia ambiental a la historiografia latinoamericana. EnglishHow much has environmental history contributed to the historiography of the region? How much has LatinAmerican environmental historiography contributed to the historiography of the region? Could this relationship be cultivated for the benefit of both? This text addresses the public and talks about history based on a critical reading of Latin American environmental historiography. It suggests that historiography has indicated history the relevance of a wider and more complex historical agency, but it has often been formed by predictable narratives of limited appeal to historians without explicit interests regarding therelationship between societies and ecosystems. It is argued that, when entering the last years of a more mature phase, Latin American environmental historiography has opened a door to better questions concerning fundamental topics of Latin American historiography, questions and objects which seem conceptually, as well as methodologically, innovative. The article presents, by means of examples, topics related with agrarian issues and the construction of the nation state, nonetheless, noting that there is a necessity to better document and systematize the methodology of environmental history. The conclusions move towards the hypothesis that the Anthropocene, as a place of epistemological controversy and methodological challenge, may represent a territory of original contribution by environmental history to Latin American historiography. francaisQuels ont ete les apports de l’histoire environnementale latinoamericaine a l’historiographie de cette region? A quel point l’historiographie environnementale latino-americaine a voulu influencer l’historiographie de la region? Cet article reflechit sur l’histoire a partir d’une lecture critique de l’historiographie environnementale latino-americaine. On affirme ici que celleci montre a l’histoire l’importance d’une agence historique plus large et plus complexe, meme si elle se contente souvent d’apportes des narratives previsibles et peu ttirantes pour les historiens qui ne sont pas forcement interesses par le rapport entre les societes et les ecosystemes. Par ailleurs, l’historiographie environnementale latino-americaine a ouvert recemment la voie pour des questions concernant les problemes fondamentaux de l’historiographie latinoamericaine,des questions qui constituent une renovation et conceptuelle et methodologique. Par exemple, il estquestion ici du probleme agricole et de la construction de l’Etat national, tout en signalant qu’il faut mieux systematiser la methodologie de l’histoire environnementale. Enfin, on conclut que l’anthropocene en tant que sujet de controverse epistemologique et defi ecologique, peut donner lieu a un ensemble de contributions de l’histoire environnementale a l’histoire latino-americaine. ecosystemes. Par ailleurs,l’historiographie environnementale latino-americaine aouvert recemment la voie pour des questions concernant\",\"PeriodicalId\":41990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historia y Memoria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historia y Memoria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19053/20275137.NESPECIAL.2020.11586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia y Memoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19053/20275137.NESPECIAL.2020.11586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
拉丁美洲环境历史领域对该地区的史学贡献了多少?是什么对拉丁美洲的环境史学如此重要,以至于影响了该地区的历史史学?你能编织这种关系对双方都更有利吗?这篇文章通过对拉丁美洲环境史学的批判性解读向公众讲述了历史。他认为,这表明历史具有更广泛和更复杂的历史机构的相关性,但往往满足于可预测的叙述,对历史学家的吸引力有限,对社会和生态系统之间的关系没有明确的兴趣。他认为,随着近年来进入一个更成熟的阶段,拉丁美洲环境史学为更好地研究拉丁美洲环境史学的基本问题、问题和对象开辟了道路,这些问题和对象在概念和方法上都是革新的。在这篇文章中,作者提出了一种方法,通过这种方法,环境历史的方法论可以被更好地记录和系统化。本研究的目的是分析拉丁美洲环境史学中环境历史的起源和发展,以及环境史学对拉丁美洲环境历史的贡献。环境历史对该地区的史学有多大贡献?拉丁美洲环境史学对该区域的史学有多大贡献?这种关系能否为双方的利益而培养?This text addresses the public history and talks about based on a critical reading of Latin American环境historiography。它表明,史学已经表明历史与一个更广泛和更复杂的历史机构的相关性,但它往往是由可预测的叙述构成的,这些叙述对历史学家的吸引力有限,而对社会和生态系统之间的关系没有明确的兴趣。有人认为,在进入最近几年较为成熟的阶段时,拉丁美洲环境史学为有关拉丁美洲史学基本主题、问题和对象的更好问题打开了大门,这些问题和对象在概念上和方法上都具有创新性。本文举例介绍了与农业问题和民族国家建设有关的主题,指出有必要更好地记录和系统化环境历史的方法。这一结论进一步提出了这样一种假设,即人类世作为认识论争议和方法论挑战的地方,可能代表了环境历史对拉丁美洲史学的原始贡献领域。拉丁美洲环境史对该地区的史学有什么贡献?拉丁美洲环境史学在多大程度上影响了该地区的史学?本文通过对拉丁美洲环境史学的批判性解读来反思历史。这里有人说,它向历史展示了一个更广泛和更复杂的历史机构的重要性,尽管它往往满足于为历史学家提供可预测的和不吸引人的叙述,他们不一定对社会和生态系统之间的关系感兴趣。此外,拉丁美洲环境史学最近为有关拉丁美洲史学基本问题的问题开辟了道路,这些问题构成了概念和方法的革新。例如,它讨论了农业问题和民族国家的建设,同时指出有必要使环境历史的方法更加系统化。最后,我们得出结论,人类世作为一个认识论争议和生态挑战的主题,可以产生一系列的环境历史对拉丁美洲历史的贡献。ecosystemes。此外,拉丁美洲的环境史学最近为有关环境的问题开辟了道路
¿Qué hay de histórico en la Historiografía ambiental en América Latina?
espanol ?Cuanto ha aportado el campo de la historia ambiental latinoamericana a la historiografia de la region?, ?que tanto le ha importado a la historiografia ambiental latinoamericana incidir en la historiografia de la region?, ?podria tejerse esta relacion con mayor provecho para ambas? Este escrito le habla al publico de la Historia desde una lectura critica de la historiografia ambiental latinoamericana. Sugiere que esta le ha indicado a la Historia la relevancia de una agencia historica mas amplia y compleja, pero a menudo se ha conformado con narrativas previsibles de limitado atractivo para historiadores sin intereses explicitos hacia la relacion entre sociedades y ecosistemas. Argumenta que, al entrar en los ultimos anos a una etapa mas madura, la historiografia ambiental latinoamericana ha abierto el camino hacia mejores preguntas sobre temas fundamentales de la historiografia latinoamericana, interrogantes y objetos que resultan renovadores tanto conceptual como metodologicamente. Aborda, a manera de ejemplos, los asuntos de la cuestion agraria y la construccion del Estado nacional, senalando sin embargo que persiste una necesidad de documentar y sistematizar mejor la metodologia de la historia ambiental. Las Conclusiones avanzan hacia la hipotesis de que el Antropoceno, como lugar de controversia epistemologica y de desafio metodologico, puede representar un terreno de contribucion original de la historia ambiental a la historiografia latinoamericana. EnglishHow much has environmental history contributed to the historiography of the region? How much has LatinAmerican environmental historiography contributed to the historiography of the region? Could this relationship be cultivated for the benefit of both? This text addresses the public and talks about history based on a critical reading of Latin American environmental historiography. It suggests that historiography has indicated history the relevance of a wider and more complex historical agency, but it has often been formed by predictable narratives of limited appeal to historians without explicit interests regarding therelationship between societies and ecosystems. It is argued that, when entering the last years of a more mature phase, Latin American environmental historiography has opened a door to better questions concerning fundamental topics of Latin American historiography, questions and objects which seem conceptually, as well as methodologically, innovative. The article presents, by means of examples, topics related with agrarian issues and the construction of the nation state, nonetheless, noting that there is a necessity to better document and systematize the methodology of environmental history. The conclusions move towards the hypothesis that the Anthropocene, as a place of epistemological controversy and methodological challenge, may represent a territory of original contribution by environmental history to Latin American historiography. francaisQuels ont ete les apports de l’histoire environnementale latinoamericaine a l’historiographie de cette region? A quel point l’historiographie environnementale latino-americaine a voulu influencer l’historiographie de la region? Cet article reflechit sur l’histoire a partir d’une lecture critique de l’historiographie environnementale latino-americaine. On affirme ici que celleci montre a l’histoire l’importance d’une agence historique plus large et plus complexe, meme si elle se contente souvent d’apportes des narratives previsibles et peu ttirantes pour les historiens qui ne sont pas forcement interesses par le rapport entre les societes et les ecosystemes. Par ailleurs, l’historiographie environnementale latino-americaine a ouvert recemment la voie pour des questions concernant les problemes fondamentaux de l’historiographie latinoamericaine,des questions qui constituent une renovation et conceptuelle et methodologique. Par exemple, il estquestion ici du probleme agricole et de la construction de l’Etat national, tout en signalant qu’il faut mieux systematiser la methodologie de l’histoire environnementale. Enfin, on conclut que l’anthropocene en tant que sujet de controverse epistemologique et defi ecologique, peut donner lieu a un ensemble de contributions de l’histoire environnementale a l’histoire latino-americaine. ecosystemes. Par ailleurs,l’historiographie environnementale latino-americaine aouvert recemment la voie pour des questions concernant
期刊介绍:
History refers to the permanent dialogue between past and present, change and permanence, duration and event, linear and cyclical, diachronic and synchronic. It refers to a system of thought that gives an account of society in time. Memory, on the other hand is one of the fields that configure our recent past, constituted by a convergence of practices, social representations, collective imagination, and ways in which the population identifies itself in a context. The purpose of Historia Y MEMORIA journal is to disseminate unpublished research-based essays and articles in any historiographical field.