关于不知道

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
J. D. Porter
{"title":"关于不知道","authors":"J. D. Porter","doi":"10.13110/criticism.63.4.0445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Criticism 63.4_07_Porter.indd Page 445 17/11/21 6:51 pm Criticism Fall 2021, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 445–448. ISSN 0011-1589. doi: 10.13110/criticism.63.4.0445 © 2021 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309 Distant Horizons collects about a decade of cutting-edge literary digital humanities (DH) work into a concise, accessible volume. The five chapters work equally well as standalone experiments or in the service of Ted Underwood’s overarching argument that DH reconfigures our understanding of literary history. It’s a clear must read for anyone working in literary DH (especially text mining) or in literary history more generally, and when it is inevitably added to dozens of syllabi, both students and teachers will find a lot to admire. Yet the most profound achievement of the book is its demonstration of a genuinely new kind of literary critical knowledge. This is not quite how Underwood casts it, though. He focuses on two methodological interventions made possible by the DH approach. First, there is the familiar issue of scale— the capacity of DH to tackle thousands of texts spread across centuries of production. Underwood argues that this new scale of attention fundamentally changes our understanding of literary history, writing that “we have narrated literary history as a sequence of discrete movements and periods because chunks of that size are about as much of the past as a single person could remember and discuss at one time” (ix). The digital approach, he says, enables us to consider changes that are too long term, slow moving, or widely dispersed to have been visible ON NOT ALREADY KNOWING J. D. Porter","PeriodicalId":42834,"journal":{"name":"FILM CRITICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Not Already Knowing\",\"authors\":\"J. D. Porter\",\"doi\":\"10.13110/criticism.63.4.0445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Criticism 63.4_07_Porter.indd Page 445 17/11/21 6:51 pm Criticism Fall 2021, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 445–448. ISSN 0011-1589. doi: 10.13110/criticism.63.4.0445 © 2021 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309 Distant Horizons collects about a decade of cutting-edge literary digital humanities (DH) work into a concise, accessible volume. The five chapters work equally well as standalone experiments or in the service of Ted Underwood’s overarching argument that DH reconfigures our understanding of literary history. It’s a clear must read for anyone working in literary DH (especially text mining) or in literary history more generally, and when it is inevitably added to dozens of syllabi, both students and teachers will find a lot to admire. Yet the most profound achievement of the book is its demonstration of a genuinely new kind of literary critical knowledge. This is not quite how Underwood casts it, though. He focuses on two methodological interventions made possible by the DH approach. First, there is the familiar issue of scale— the capacity of DH to tackle thousands of texts spread across centuries of production. Underwood argues that this new scale of attention fundamentally changes our understanding of literary history, writing that “we have narrated literary history as a sequence of discrete movements and periods because chunks of that size are about as much of the past as a single person could remember and discuss at one time” (ix). The digital approach, he says, enables us to consider changes that are too long term, slow moving, or widely dispersed to have been visible ON NOT ALREADY KNOWING J. D. Porter\",\"PeriodicalId\":42834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FILM CRITICISM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FILM CRITICISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.63.4.0445\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.63.4.0445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

63.4 _07_porter批评。add第445页17/11/21下午6:51批评秋天2021,卷63,第4号,第445 - 448页。ISSN 0011 - 1589。doi: 10.13110/ critical .63.4.0445©2021 by韦恩州立大学出版社,底特律,密歇根州48201-1309遥远的地平线收集了大约十年的前沿文学数字人文(DH)工作成一个简洁,易于访问的卷。这五章既可以作为独立的实验,也可以为泰德·安德伍德(Ted Underwood)的总体论点服务,即DH重新配置了我们对文学史的理解。对于从事文学DH(尤其是文本挖掘)或更广泛的文学史研究的人来说,这显然是一本必读的书,当它不可避免地被添加到几十个教学大纲中时,学生和老师都会发现很多值得钦佩的地方。然而,这本书最深刻的成就是它展示了一种真正的新型文学批评知识。不过,安德伍德并不完全是这么演绎的。他着重介绍了卫生保健方法可能实现的两种方法干预。首先,有一个熟悉的规模问题——DH处理跨越几个世纪的数千篇文本的能力。安德伍德认为,这种新的关注尺度从根本上改变了我们对文学史的理解,他写道,“我们把文学史叙述为一系列离散的运动和时期,因为这种规模的大块大约是一个人一次能记住和讨论的过去”(ix)。他说,数字方法使我们能够考虑那些过于长期、缓慢的变化,或广泛散布在不知道的人身上
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Not Already Knowing
Criticism 63.4_07_Porter.indd Page 445 17/11/21 6:51 pm Criticism Fall 2021, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 445–448. ISSN 0011-1589. doi: 10.13110/criticism.63.4.0445 © 2021 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309 Distant Horizons collects about a decade of cutting-edge literary digital humanities (DH) work into a concise, accessible volume. The five chapters work equally well as standalone experiments or in the service of Ted Underwood’s overarching argument that DH reconfigures our understanding of literary history. It’s a clear must read for anyone working in literary DH (especially text mining) or in literary history more generally, and when it is inevitably added to dozens of syllabi, both students and teachers will find a lot to admire. Yet the most profound achievement of the book is its demonstration of a genuinely new kind of literary critical knowledge. This is not quite how Underwood casts it, though. He focuses on two methodological interventions made possible by the DH approach. First, there is the familiar issue of scale— the capacity of DH to tackle thousands of texts spread across centuries of production. Underwood argues that this new scale of attention fundamentally changes our understanding of literary history, writing that “we have narrated literary history as a sequence of discrete movements and periods because chunks of that size are about as much of the past as a single person could remember and discuss at one time” (ix). The digital approach, he says, enables us to consider changes that are too long term, slow moving, or widely dispersed to have been visible ON NOT ALREADY KNOWING J. D. Porter
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FILM CRITICISM
FILM CRITICISM FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Film Criticism is a peer-reviewed, online publication whose aim is to bring together scholarship in the field of cinema and media studies in order to present the finest work in this area, foregrounding textual criticism as a primary value. Our readership is academic, although we strive to publish material that is both accessible to undergraduates and engaging to established scholars. With over 40 years of continuous publication, Film Criticism is the third oldest academic film journal in the United States. We have published work by such international scholars as Dudley Andrew, David Bordwell, David Cook, Andrew Horton, Ann Kaplan, Marcia Landy, Peter Lehman, Janet Staiger, and Robin Wood. Equally important, FC continues to present work from emerging generations of film and media scholars representing multiple critical, cultural and theoretical perspectives. Film Criticism is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信