腹腔镜胃应用:危机时刻的合适选择?

Abdul Rahman Hammadieh, M. F. Safadi, Osama Shaheen
{"title":"腹腔镜胃应用:危机时刻的合适选择?","authors":"Abdul Rahman Hammadieh, M. F. Safadi, Osama Shaheen","doi":"10.9734/bjmmr/2017/30714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the practice of laparoscopic gastric plication (LGP) in Syria with particular emphasis on efficacy and complications, and to explore the concept of bariatric surgery in times of crisis with its related issues and concerns. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study included all patients who underwent LGP between February 2011 and September 2014. The main outcome was the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL). Secondary outcomes included operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, and improvement of related comorbidities. Results: Of the 129 patients who underwent LGP in the study period, 96 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean body mass index was 39.5 kg/m (32–49 kg/m). No cases of conversion to laparotomy, leak, intraabdominal infection, or mortality were seen. Vomiting was the most common postoperative complaint, which was encountered in 91.6% of patients. Two patients required operation reversal because of protracted vomiting. Mean %EWL was 60%, 65%, 70%, 67%, 66% and 65% at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months respectively. Obesity-related comorbidities were present in 33 patients (34.4%), and they showed considerable improvement or complete Original Research Article Hammadieh et al.; BJMMR, 19(3): 1-9, 2017; Article no.BJMMR.30714 2 resolution in 57-100% of cases. Weight regain was seen in 7 patients (7.3%) after 36 months, three of whom (3.1%) requested reoperation. Conclusions: LGP is a feasible and safe operation for the treatment of morbid obesity, and it is comparable to other restrictive bariatric operations with fewer rates of serious complications. It is an appropriate technique in times of crisis due to low cost and ease of follow-up.","PeriodicalId":9249,"journal":{"name":"British journal of medicine and medical research","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic Gastric Plication: Appropriate Option in Times of Crisis?\",\"authors\":\"Abdul Rahman Hammadieh, M. F. Safadi, Osama Shaheen\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/bjmmr/2017/30714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the practice of laparoscopic gastric plication (LGP) in Syria with particular emphasis on efficacy and complications, and to explore the concept of bariatric surgery in times of crisis with its related issues and concerns. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study included all patients who underwent LGP between February 2011 and September 2014. The main outcome was the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL). Secondary outcomes included operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, and improvement of related comorbidities. Results: Of the 129 patients who underwent LGP in the study period, 96 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean body mass index was 39.5 kg/m (32–49 kg/m). No cases of conversion to laparotomy, leak, intraabdominal infection, or mortality were seen. Vomiting was the most common postoperative complaint, which was encountered in 91.6% of patients. Two patients required operation reversal because of protracted vomiting. Mean %EWL was 60%, 65%, 70%, 67%, 66% and 65% at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months respectively. Obesity-related comorbidities were present in 33 patients (34.4%), and they showed considerable improvement or complete Original Research Article Hammadieh et al.; BJMMR, 19(3): 1-9, 2017; Article no.BJMMR.30714 2 resolution in 57-100% of cases. Weight regain was seen in 7 patients (7.3%) after 36 months, three of whom (3.1%) requested reoperation. Conclusions: LGP is a feasible and safe operation for the treatment of morbid obesity, and it is comparable to other restrictive bariatric operations with fewer rates of serious complications. It is an appropriate technique in times of crisis due to low cost and ease of follow-up.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of medicine and medical research\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of medicine and medical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/bjmmr/2017/30714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of medicine and medical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bjmmr/2017/30714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨叙利亚腹腔镜胃应用手术(LGP)的疗效和并发症,探讨危机时期减肥手术的概念及其相关问题和关注。材料和方法:一项前瞻性队列研究包括2011年2月至2014年9月期间接受LGP的所有患者。主要结果为超重减重百分比(%EWL)。次要结局包括手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症和相关合并症的改善。结果:研究期间129例LGP患者中,96例纳入最终分析。平均体重指数为39.5 kg/m (32 ~ 49 kg/m)。没有病例转为剖腹手术,泄漏,腹腔内感染,或死亡。呕吐是术后最常见的主诉,发生率为91.6%。2例患者因持续呕吐需要手术逆转。6、12、18、24、30、36个月的平均EWL分别为60%、65%、70%、67%、66%和65%。33例(34.4%)患者存在肥胖相关的合并症,并显示出相当大的改善或完整的原始研究文章Hammadieh et al;地球物理学报,19(3):1-9,2017;文章no.BJMMR。30714,2分辨率在57-100%的情况下。36个月后体重恢复7例(7.3%),其中3例(3.1%)要求再次手术。结论:LGP是一种可行、安全的治疗病态肥胖的手术,与其他限制性减肥手术相当,严重并发症发生率低。由于成本低,易于随访,因此在危机时刻是一种合适的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laparoscopic Gastric Plication: Appropriate Option in Times of Crisis?
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the practice of laparoscopic gastric plication (LGP) in Syria with particular emphasis on efficacy and complications, and to explore the concept of bariatric surgery in times of crisis with its related issues and concerns. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study included all patients who underwent LGP between February 2011 and September 2014. The main outcome was the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL). Secondary outcomes included operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, and improvement of related comorbidities. Results: Of the 129 patients who underwent LGP in the study period, 96 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean body mass index was 39.5 kg/m (32–49 kg/m). No cases of conversion to laparotomy, leak, intraabdominal infection, or mortality were seen. Vomiting was the most common postoperative complaint, which was encountered in 91.6% of patients. Two patients required operation reversal because of protracted vomiting. Mean %EWL was 60%, 65%, 70%, 67%, 66% and 65% at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months respectively. Obesity-related comorbidities were present in 33 patients (34.4%), and they showed considerable improvement or complete Original Research Article Hammadieh et al.; BJMMR, 19(3): 1-9, 2017; Article no.BJMMR.30714 2 resolution in 57-100% of cases. Weight regain was seen in 7 patients (7.3%) after 36 months, three of whom (3.1%) requested reoperation. Conclusions: LGP is a feasible and safe operation for the treatment of morbid obesity, and it is comparable to other restrictive bariatric operations with fewer rates of serious complications. It is an appropriate technique in times of crisis due to low cost and ease of follow-up.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信