在10周的在线课程中,协作、笔记完整性和表现的相互作用

IF 6.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jamie Costley , Matthew Courtney , Mik Fanguy
{"title":"在10周的在线课程中,协作、笔记完整性和表现的相互作用","authors":"Jamie Costley ,&nbsp;Matthew Courtney ,&nbsp;Mik Fanguy","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the effects that online collaborative note-taking has on student performance. The study draws on 10 weeks of data from 273 STEM university students who were collaborating in 61 groups. Group and individual learning were assessed weekly by evaluating the completeness of collaborative note-taking documents and subsequent individual assessments. Analysis suggested up to 23% of the variation in course performance could be attributed to between-group effects. Further, a series of 10 multilevel temporal models suggested no substantive effects in the first half of the course, though in the second half of the course, groups that co-created more complete course notes tended to exhibit improved average student performance. We speculate that the learning advantages afforded to student groups that produce more complete course notes may be delayed. This study adds to the growing body of research into the effects that collaboration has on student learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The interaction of collaboration, note-taking completeness, and performance over 10 weeks of an online course\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Costley ,&nbsp;Matthew Courtney ,&nbsp;Mik Fanguy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines the effects that online collaborative note-taking has on student performance. The study draws on 10 weeks of data from 273 STEM university students who were collaborating in 61 groups. Group and individual learning were assessed weekly by evaluating the completeness of collaborative note-taking documents and subsequent individual assessments. Analysis suggested up to 23% of the variation in course performance could be attributed to between-group effects. Further, a series of 10 multilevel temporal models suggested no substantive effects in the first half of the course, though in the second half of the course, groups that co-created more complete course notes tended to exhibit improved average student performance. We speculate that the learning advantages afforded to student groups that produce more complete course notes may be delayed. This study adds to the growing body of research into the effects that collaboration has on student learning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751621000403\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751621000403","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本研究考察了在线协作记笔记对学生表现的影响。这项研究利用了273名STEM大学学生为期10周的数据,他们被分成61个小组进行合作。每周通过评估协作笔记文件的完整性和随后的个人评估来评估小组和个人学习。分析表明,高达23%的课程表现差异可归因于组间效应。此外,一系列的10个多层次时间模型表明,在课程的前半部分没有实质性的影响,尽管在课程的后半部分,共同创建更完整的课程笔记的小组往往表现出提高的平均学生成绩。我们推测,提供给学生群体的学习优势,产生更完整的课程笔记可能会延迟。这项研究增加了对合作对学生学习的影响的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The interaction of collaboration, note-taking completeness, and performance over 10 weeks of an online course

This study examines the effects that online collaborative note-taking has on student performance. The study draws on 10 weeks of data from 273 STEM university students who were collaborating in 61 groups. Group and individual learning were assessed weekly by evaluating the completeness of collaborative note-taking documents and subsequent individual assessments. Analysis suggested up to 23% of the variation in course performance could be attributed to between-group effects. Further, a series of 10 multilevel temporal models suggested no substantive effects in the first half of the course, though in the second half of the course, groups that co-created more complete course notes tended to exhibit improved average student performance. We speculate that the learning advantages afforded to student groups that produce more complete course notes may be delayed. This study adds to the growing body of research into the effects that collaboration has on student learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internet and Higher Education
Internet and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Internet and Higher Education is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal focused on contemporary issues and future trends in online learning, teaching, and administration within post-secondary education. It welcomes contributions from diverse academic disciplines worldwide and provides a platform for theory papers, research studies, critical essays, editorials, reviews, case studies, and social commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信