Bertha Garza Bernal, R. S. Nájera, Juan Manuel Solís Soto, Jaime Adrián Mendoza Tijerina, Hilda Hortencia Hermelinda Torre Martínez, Myriam Angélica De La Garza Ramos, G. González
{"title":"异构体与玻璃离聚体治疗乳牙龋的临床比较评价","authors":"Bertha Garza Bernal, R. S. Nájera, Juan Manuel Solís Soto, Jaime Adrián Mendoza Tijerina, Hilda Hortencia Hermelinda Torre Martínez, Myriam Angélica De La Garza Ramos, G. González","doi":"10.22271/oral.2023.v9.i2g.1775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The giomers are a family of dental materials that allow a faster effect and better functional, esthetic and mechanical properties. Objective: To analyze the restorative ability between giomer and type II glass ionomer in class I cavities. Methodology: A mouth split design was carried out in which 27 permanent molars ICDAS 4, 5 or 6 were filled with giomer (14) and glass ionomer type II (13), respectively, in patients with high or medium caries risk. Intraoral radiographs and polyvinyl siloxane impressions were taken every 3 months. FDI criteria were used to evaluate radiographic success, material fracture, and marginal adaptation. Results: Compared to glass ionomer, giomer had better marginal adaptation at 6 and 9 months ( p< 0.05), was also better in fracture restoration at 3, 6 and 9 months ( p< 0.05), and better radiographic success at 6 and 9 months ( p< 0.05). Conclusions: Giomer has better clinical results in terms of marginal adaptation, radiographic success and fracture of the material than glass ionomer.","PeriodicalId":13838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative clinical evaluation of giomer and glass ionomer in primary teeth caries\",\"authors\":\"Bertha Garza Bernal, R. S. Nájera, Juan Manuel Solís Soto, Jaime Adrián Mendoza Tijerina, Hilda Hortencia Hermelinda Torre Martínez, Myriam Angélica De La Garza Ramos, G. González\",\"doi\":\"10.22271/oral.2023.v9.i2g.1775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The giomers are a family of dental materials that allow a faster effect and better functional, esthetic and mechanical properties. Objective: To analyze the restorative ability between giomer and type II glass ionomer in class I cavities. Methodology: A mouth split design was carried out in which 27 permanent molars ICDAS 4, 5 or 6 were filled with giomer (14) and glass ionomer type II (13), respectively, in patients with high or medium caries risk. Intraoral radiographs and polyvinyl siloxane impressions were taken every 3 months. FDI criteria were used to evaluate radiographic success, material fracture, and marginal adaptation. Results: Compared to glass ionomer, giomer had better marginal adaptation at 6 and 9 months ( p< 0.05), was also better in fracture restoration at 3, 6 and 9 months ( p< 0.05), and better radiographic success at 6 and 9 months ( p< 0.05). Conclusions: Giomer has better clinical results in terms of marginal adaptation, radiographic success and fracture of the material than glass ionomer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2023.v9.i2g.1775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2023.v9.i2g.1775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative clinical evaluation of giomer and glass ionomer in primary teeth caries
Introduction: The giomers are a family of dental materials that allow a faster effect and better functional, esthetic and mechanical properties. Objective: To analyze the restorative ability between giomer and type II glass ionomer in class I cavities. Methodology: A mouth split design was carried out in which 27 permanent molars ICDAS 4, 5 or 6 were filled with giomer (14) and glass ionomer type II (13), respectively, in patients with high or medium caries risk. Intraoral radiographs and polyvinyl siloxane impressions were taken every 3 months. FDI criteria were used to evaluate radiographic success, material fracture, and marginal adaptation. Results: Compared to glass ionomer, giomer had better marginal adaptation at 6 and 9 months ( p< 0.05), was also better in fracture restoration at 3, 6 and 9 months ( p< 0.05), and better radiographic success at 6 and 9 months ( p< 0.05). Conclusions: Giomer has better clinical results in terms of marginal adaptation, radiographic success and fracture of the material than glass ionomer.