正确解读断面分析结果

Juyuan Zheng , Yuli Huang , Zhe Qu
{"title":"正确解读断面分析结果","authors":"Juyuan Zheng ,&nbsp;Yuli Huang ,&nbsp;Zhe Qu","doi":"10.1016/j.eqrea.2023.100238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Displacement control algorithms commonly used to evaluate axial force-bending moment (PM) diagrams may lead to incorrect interpretations of the strength envelopes for asymmetric sections. This paper aims to offer valuable insights by comparing existing displacement control algorithms with a newly proposed force control algorithm. The main focus is on the PM diagrams of three example sections that exhibit varying degrees of asymmetry. The comparative study indicates that conventional displacement control algorithms inevitably introduce non-zero out-of-plane bending moments. The reported PM diagram in such cases erroneously neglects the out-of-plane moment and fails to represent the strength envelope accurately. This oversight results in significant and unconservative errors when verifying the strength of asymmetric sections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100384,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Research Advances","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772467023000350/pdfft?md5=6c2593ead24420ac0eea4c1963b7e7ee&pid=1-s2.0-S2772467023000350-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proper interpretation of sectional analysis results\",\"authors\":\"Juyuan Zheng ,&nbsp;Yuli Huang ,&nbsp;Zhe Qu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eqrea.2023.100238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Displacement control algorithms commonly used to evaluate axial force-bending moment (PM) diagrams may lead to incorrect interpretations of the strength envelopes for asymmetric sections. This paper aims to offer valuable insights by comparing existing displacement control algorithms with a newly proposed force control algorithm. The main focus is on the PM diagrams of three example sections that exhibit varying degrees of asymmetry. The comparative study indicates that conventional displacement control algorithms inevitably introduce non-zero out-of-plane bending moments. The reported PM diagram in such cases erroneously neglects the out-of-plane moment and fails to represent the strength envelope accurately. This oversight results in significant and unconservative errors when verifying the strength of asymmetric sections.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earthquake Research Advances\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772467023000350/pdfft?md5=6c2593ead24420ac0eea4c1963b7e7ee&pid=1-s2.0-S2772467023000350-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earthquake Research Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772467023000350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Research Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772467023000350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通常用于评估轴力-弯矩(PM)图的位移控制算法可能会导致对不对称截面强度包络的错误解释。本文旨在通过比较现有的位移控制算法和新提出的力控制算法,提供有价值的见解。主要重点是三个示例截面的力矩图,这些截面表现出不同程度的不对称。对比研究表明,传统的位移控制算法不可避免地会引入非零平面外弯矩。在这种情况下,所报告的 PM 图会错误地忽略平面外弯矩,无法准确表示强度包络。在验证不对称截面的强度时,这一疏忽会导致严重的非保守误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proper interpretation of sectional analysis results

Displacement control algorithms commonly used to evaluate axial force-bending moment (PM) diagrams may lead to incorrect interpretations of the strength envelopes for asymmetric sections. This paper aims to offer valuable insights by comparing existing displacement control algorithms with a newly proposed force control algorithm. The main focus is on the PM diagrams of three example sections that exhibit varying degrees of asymmetry. The comparative study indicates that conventional displacement control algorithms inevitably introduce non-zero out-of-plane bending moments. The reported PM diagram in such cases erroneously neglects the out-of-plane moment and fails to represent the strength envelope accurately. This oversight results in significant and unconservative errors when verifying the strength of asymmetric sections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信