{"title":"联合解调与卷积解码的复杂性研究","authors":"Dimitris Gkrimpas, Vassilis Paliouras","doi":"10.1109/SIPS.2007.4387629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the combined computational complexity of demodulation and decoding of QAM signals. Four combinations of demodulation and decoding techniques are compared in terms of bit error rate (BER) vs. signal-to-noise (SNR) behavior, finite word length effects, and hardware complexity. It is found that joint demodulation and decoding using a high-radix trellis can be more efficient for higher orders of modulation, while a decoding strategy which produces soft values, followed by a Viterbi decoder is more efficient for lower modulation orders. Complexity formulas that take into account word lengths and modulation order are introduced.","PeriodicalId":93225,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (2007-2014)","volume":"34 1","pages":"669-674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On The Complexity of Joint Demodulation and Convolutional Decoding\",\"authors\":\"Dimitris Gkrimpas, Vassilis Paliouras\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIPS.2007.4387629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the combined computational complexity of demodulation and decoding of QAM signals. Four combinations of demodulation and decoding techniques are compared in terms of bit error rate (BER) vs. signal-to-noise (SNR) behavior, finite word length effects, and hardware complexity. It is found that joint demodulation and decoding using a high-radix trellis can be more efficient for higher orders of modulation, while a decoding strategy which produces soft values, followed by a Viterbi decoder is more efficient for lower modulation orders. Complexity formulas that take into account word lengths and modulation order are introduced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (2007-2014)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"669-674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (2007-2014)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIPS.2007.4387629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (2007-2014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIPS.2007.4387629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On The Complexity of Joint Demodulation and Convolutional Decoding
This paper investigates the combined computational complexity of demodulation and decoding of QAM signals. Four combinations of demodulation and decoding techniques are compared in terms of bit error rate (BER) vs. signal-to-noise (SNR) behavior, finite word length effects, and hardware complexity. It is found that joint demodulation and decoding using a high-radix trellis can be more efficient for higher orders of modulation, while a decoding strategy which produces soft values, followed by a Viterbi decoder is more efficient for lower modulation orders. Complexity formulas that take into account word lengths and modulation order are introduced.