术前组织学证实的N2病变非小细胞肺癌多模式治疗后持续性N2病变和淋巴结比例对肿瘤预后的影响

S. Bongiolatti, F. Mazzoni, A. Gonfiotti, A. Salvicchi, D. Viggiano, K. Ferrari, V. Scotti, L. Voltolini
{"title":"术前组织学证实的N2病变非小细胞肺癌多模式治疗后持续性N2病变和淋巴结比例对肿瘤预后的影响","authors":"S. Bongiolatti, F. Mazzoni, A. Gonfiotti, A. Salvicchi, D. Viggiano, K. Ferrari, V. Scotti, L. Voltolini","doi":"10.31487/J.COR.2021.05.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objectives of our retrospective analysis were to estimate the oncological long-term results of patients with ypN2 and to evaluate the impact of lymph node ratio (LNR) on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).\nMethods: We analysed all consecutive patients (n=85) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery for pre-operative pathologically proven stage IIIA-B (N2) NSCLC from 2014 to 2020. Median LNR (0.29 or 29%) was selected as threshold for grouping. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used to test the association between OS, DFS and covariates.\nResults: Post-operative mortality was 3.5%. The median follow-up was 21 months (range 6-69 months). The 5-year OS and DFS of the cohort were 41% and 20%. Patients with LNR>0.29 (n=13; 15.3%) showed a trend toward worse survival than patients with LNR0 (n=44; 51.8%) with a 5-year OS of 56% VS 14% (p=0.077), confirmed as a trend at the multivariable analysis (HR 2.28; p=0.066). At the univariate analysis a worse DFS was observed for ypN2 patients (n=58; 68.2%) compared with nodal downstaging (46% vs 25% 3-year DFS, p=0.039). DFS was different according to LNR: 3-year DFS was 14% in patients with LNR>0.29 while it reached 44% in patients with LNR 0 (p=0.043) and 62% in LNR<0.29 (p=0.03). LNR>0.29 was the only significant predictor (HR 2.89; p=0.047) of reduced DFS at the multivariable analysis.\nConclusion: patients with ypN2 disease after NAC showed acceptable oncological outcomes and this finding is true for patients with low burden of nodal disease assessed by LNR.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Persistent N2 Disease and Lymph Node Ratio on Oncological Outcomes after Multimodal Treatment in Pre-Operative Histologically Proven N2 Disease Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer\",\"authors\":\"S. Bongiolatti, F. Mazzoni, A. Gonfiotti, A. Salvicchi, D. Viggiano, K. Ferrari, V. Scotti, L. Voltolini\",\"doi\":\"10.31487/J.COR.2021.05.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objectives of our retrospective analysis were to estimate the oncological long-term results of patients with ypN2 and to evaluate the impact of lymph node ratio (LNR) on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).\\nMethods: We analysed all consecutive patients (n=85) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery for pre-operative pathologically proven stage IIIA-B (N2) NSCLC from 2014 to 2020. Median LNR (0.29 or 29%) was selected as threshold for grouping. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used to test the association between OS, DFS and covariates.\\nResults: Post-operative mortality was 3.5%. The median follow-up was 21 months (range 6-69 months). The 5-year OS and DFS of the cohort were 41% and 20%. Patients with LNR>0.29 (n=13; 15.3%) showed a trend toward worse survival than patients with LNR0 (n=44; 51.8%) with a 5-year OS of 56% VS 14% (p=0.077), confirmed as a trend at the multivariable analysis (HR 2.28; p=0.066). At the univariate analysis a worse DFS was observed for ypN2 patients (n=58; 68.2%) compared with nodal downstaging (46% vs 25% 3-year DFS, p=0.039). DFS was different according to LNR: 3-year DFS was 14% in patients with LNR>0.29 while it reached 44% in patients with LNR 0 (p=0.043) and 62% in LNR<0.29 (p=0.03). LNR>0.29 was the only significant predictor (HR 2.89; p=0.047) of reduced DFS at the multivariable analysis.\\nConclusion: patients with ypN2 disease after NAC showed acceptable oncological outcomes and this finding is true for patients with low burden of nodal disease assessed by LNR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oncology and Research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oncology and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31487/J.COR.2021.05.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/J.COR.2021.05.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们回顾性分析的目的是评估ypN2患者的长期肿瘤学结果,并评估淋巴结比例(LNR)对总(OS)和无病生存(DFS)的影响。方法:我们分析了2014年至2020年所有连续接受新辅助化疗(NAC)和手术的术前病理证实的IIIA-B (N2)期非小细胞肺癌患者(n=85)。选择中位LNR(0.29或29%)作为分组阈值。生存率采用Kaplan-Meier法估计。采用Cox回归检验OS、DFS与协变量之间的相关性。结果:术后死亡率为3.5%。中位随访为21个月(范围6-69个月)。该队列的5年OS和DFS分别为41%和20%。LNR>0.29的患者(n=13;15.3%)表现出比LNR0患者更差的生存趋势(n=44;51.8%), 5年OS为56% VS 14% (p=0.077),在多变量分析中证实了这一趋势(HR 2.28;p = 0.066)。在单变量分析中,观察到ypN2患者的DFS更差(n=58;68.2%)与淋巴结降期相比(46% vs 25%, 3年DFS, p=0.039)。LNR>0.29的患者3年DFS为14%,LNR为0的患者3年DFS为44% (p=0.043), LNR0.29的患者3年DFS为62% (HR 2.89;p=0.047)在多变量分析中降低了DFS。结论:NAC后的ypN2疾病患者的肿瘤预后可接受,LNR评估的淋巴结疾病负担低的患者也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Persistent N2 Disease and Lymph Node Ratio on Oncological Outcomes after Multimodal Treatment in Pre-Operative Histologically Proven N2 Disease Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Objective: The objectives of our retrospective analysis were to estimate the oncological long-term results of patients with ypN2 and to evaluate the impact of lymph node ratio (LNR) on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: We analysed all consecutive patients (n=85) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery for pre-operative pathologically proven stage IIIA-B (N2) NSCLC from 2014 to 2020. Median LNR (0.29 or 29%) was selected as threshold for grouping. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used to test the association between OS, DFS and covariates. Results: Post-operative mortality was 3.5%. The median follow-up was 21 months (range 6-69 months). The 5-year OS and DFS of the cohort were 41% and 20%. Patients with LNR>0.29 (n=13; 15.3%) showed a trend toward worse survival than patients with LNR0 (n=44; 51.8%) with a 5-year OS of 56% VS 14% (p=0.077), confirmed as a trend at the multivariable analysis (HR 2.28; p=0.066). At the univariate analysis a worse DFS was observed for ypN2 patients (n=58; 68.2%) compared with nodal downstaging (46% vs 25% 3-year DFS, p=0.039). DFS was different according to LNR: 3-year DFS was 14% in patients with LNR>0.29 while it reached 44% in patients with LNR 0 (p=0.043) and 62% in LNR<0.29 (p=0.03). LNR>0.29 was the only significant predictor (HR 2.89; p=0.047) of reduced DFS at the multivariable analysis. Conclusion: patients with ypN2 disease after NAC showed acceptable oncological outcomes and this finding is true for patients with low burden of nodal disease assessed by LNR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信