经过深思熟虑Rezeptionsgeschichte《新约》的谈话中,萝卜Burnetég

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1017/S0028688523000048

Christina Hoegen-Rohls

{"title":"经过深思熟虑Rezeptionsgeschichte《新约》的谈话中,萝卜Burnetég","authors":"Christina Hoegen-Rohls","doi":"10.1017/S0028688523000048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present article first presents and explains the theses that emerge from Régis Burnet's monograph ‘Exegesis and History of Reception’ (Tübingen 2021) and from his SNTS Main Paper published in NTS 2023, ‘Why “Reception History” Is Not Just Another Exegetical Method: The Case of Mark's Ending’ (Leuven 2022). It then develops questions and perspectives that result from the dialogue between Burnet's approach and my own approach and continue this productive, unfinished discussion. It should be postulated that the history of interpretation and the reception history belong to the field of theological encyclopaedia and have the potential to lead to an ‘aesthetic theology’.","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"291 - 298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Überlegungen zur Rezeptionsgeschichte des Neuen Testaments im Gespräch mit Régis Burnet\",\"authors\":\"Christina Hoegen-Rohls\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0028688523000048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The present article first presents and explains the theses that emerge from Régis Burnet's monograph ‘Exegesis and History of Reception’ (Tübingen 2021) and from his SNTS Main Paper published in NTS 2023, ‘Why “Reception History” Is Not Just Another Exegetical Method: The Case of Mark's Ending’ (Leuven 2022). It then develops questions and perspectives that result from the dialogue between Burnet's approach and my own approach and continue this productive, unfinished discussion. It should be postulated that the history of interpretation and the reception history belong to the field of theological encyclopaedia and have the potential to lead to an ‘aesthetic theology’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Testament Studies\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"291 - 298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Testament Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688523000048\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Testament Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688523000048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文首先介绍并解释了r宾根2021年出版的r吉斯·伯内特的专着《训诂学和接受史》(Exegesis and History of Reception)和他在NTS 2023年发表的SNTS主要论文《为什么“接受史”不只是另一种训诂方法:马克结束的案例》(Leuven 2022年)中出现的论点。然后，从伯内特的方法和我自己的方法之间的对话中发展出问题和观点，并继续进行这一富有成效的，未完成的讨论。解释史和接受史属于神学百科领域，具有走向“审美神学”的潜力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Überlegungen zur Rezeptionsgeschichte des Neuen Testaments im Gespräch mit Régis Burnet

Abstract The present article first presents and explains the theses that emerge from Régis Burnet's monograph ‘Exegesis and History of Reception’ (Tübingen 2021) and from his SNTS Main Paper published in NTS 2023, ‘Why “Reception History” Is Not Just Another Exegetical Method: The Case of Mark's Ending’ (Leuven 2022). It then develops questions and perspectives that result from the dialogue between Burnet's approach and my own approach and continue this productive, unfinished discussion. It should be postulated that the history of interpretation and the reception history belong to the field of theological encyclopaedia and have the potential to lead to an ‘aesthetic theology’.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Testament Studies RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Testament Studies is an international peer-reviewed periodical whose contributors include the leading New Testament scholars writing in the world today. The journal publishes original articles and short studies in English, French and German on a wide range of issues pertaining to the origins, history, context and theology of the New Testament and early Christianity. All contributions represent research at the cutting edge of the discipline, which has developed a wide range of methods. The journal welcomes submissions employing any such methods in recent years. The periodical embraces exegetical, historical, literary-critical, sociological, theological and other approaches to the New Testament, including studies in its history of interpretation and effects.