不同废料和养护方法的可持续水泥砂浆

IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Z. Abed, H. Jaber, Esra’a lutfi Ibrahim
{"title":"不同废料和养护方法的可持续水泥砂浆","authors":"Z. Abed, H. Jaber, Esra’a lutfi Ibrahim","doi":"10.1680/jfoen.22.00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the essential aim is to produce an environment-friendly ferrocement mortar using different waste internal curing materials and external curing methods. Wastes of broken bricks and porcelanite were used with different volumetric replacement percentages (5%, 10%, and 15 %) of fine aggregate. Moreover, pozzolanic materials (silica fume and fly ash) were used. In addition to the water-cured reference mixture, four different curing methods (air, flan coat emulsified asphalt, wax sealing paint, and carbon dioxide gas (CO2)) were used. Compressive, flexural strength, and density for different ages of mortar (7, 14, and 28 d) were investigated. The outcomes demonstrate that, compressive strength of CO2-cured ferrocement improved by 33.3% and 28% when 5% and 10% of broken bricks was used and by 25.3% and 29% when 5% and 10% of porcelanite was used, respectively, than when the reference was used. The flexural strength was slightly improved when 10% porcelanite was used. Results demonstrate that the outcome ferrocement mortar was improved in spite of using different waste materials in production.","PeriodicalId":42902,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable ferrocement mortar with different waste materials and curing methods\",\"authors\":\"Z. Abed, H. Jaber, Esra’a lutfi Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jfoen.22.00014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the essential aim is to produce an environment-friendly ferrocement mortar using different waste internal curing materials and external curing methods. Wastes of broken bricks and porcelanite were used with different volumetric replacement percentages (5%, 10%, and 15 %) of fine aggregate. Moreover, pozzolanic materials (silica fume and fly ash) were used. In addition to the water-cured reference mixture, four different curing methods (air, flan coat emulsified asphalt, wax sealing paint, and carbon dioxide gas (CO2)) were used. Compressive, flexural strength, and density for different ages of mortar (7, 14, and 28 d) were investigated. The outcomes demonstrate that, compressive strength of CO2-cured ferrocement improved by 33.3% and 28% when 5% and 10% of broken bricks was used and by 25.3% and 29% when 5% and 10% of porcelanite was used, respectively, than when the reference was used. The flexural strength was slightly improved when 10% porcelanite was used. Results demonstrate that the outcome ferrocement mortar was improved in spite of using different waste materials in production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.22.00014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.22.00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是利用不同的废内养护材料和外养护方法生产环保型铁水泥砂浆。采用不同体积替换率(5%、10%、15%)的细骨料对废砖和废瓷进行处理。此外,还使用了火山灰材料(硅灰和粉煤灰)。除了水固化的参考混合物外,还使用了四种不同的固化方法(空气、酥皮乳化沥青、蜡封漆和二氧化碳气体)。研究了不同龄期砂浆(7、14和28 d)的抗压、抗折强度和密度。结果表明:与对照材料相比,使用5%和10%的碎砖和5%和10%的陶瓷分别提高了33.3%和28%和25.3%和29%的二氧化碳固化铁水泥的抗压强度。添加10%的陶瓷时,其抗弯强度略有提高。结果表明,在生产过程中使用不同的废料,可提高水泥砂浆的成品质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainable ferrocement mortar with different waste materials and curing methods
In this study, the essential aim is to produce an environment-friendly ferrocement mortar using different waste internal curing materials and external curing methods. Wastes of broken bricks and porcelanite were used with different volumetric replacement percentages (5%, 10%, and 15 %) of fine aggregate. Moreover, pozzolanic materials (silica fume and fly ash) were used. In addition to the water-cured reference mixture, four different curing methods (air, flan coat emulsified asphalt, wax sealing paint, and carbon dioxide gas (CO2)) were used. Compressive, flexural strength, and density for different ages of mortar (7, 14, and 28 d) were investigated. The outcomes demonstrate that, compressive strength of CO2-cured ferrocement improved by 33.3% and 28% when 5% and 10% of broken bricks was used and by 25.3% and 29% when 5% and 10% of porcelanite was used, respectively, than when the reference was used. The flexural strength was slightly improved when 10% porcelanite was used. Results demonstrate that the outcome ferrocement mortar was improved in spite of using different waste materials in production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信