总损失模型中的贝叶斯分析:结构函数的验证

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
A. Hernández-Bastida, J. M. Pérez-Sánchez, M. Fernández-Sánchez
{"title":"总损失模型中的贝叶斯分析:结构函数的验证","authors":"A. Hernández-Bastida, J. M. Pérez-Sánchez, M. Fernández-Sánchez","doi":"10.21314/JRMV.2017.176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Common ordinal models, including the ordered logit model and the continuation ratio model, are formulated by a common score (ie, a linear combination of given explanatory variables) plus rank-specific intercepts. Sensitivity to the common score is generally not differentiated between rank outcomes. We propose an ordinal model based on forward ordinal probabilities for rank outcomes. In addition to the common score and intercepts, the forward ordinal probabilities are formulated by the rankand rating-specific sensitivity (for a risk-rated portfolio). This rank-specific sensitivity allows a risk rating to respond to its migrations to default, downgrade, stay and upgrade accordingly. A parameter estimation approach based on maximum likelihood for observing rank-outcome frequencies is proposed. Applications of the proposed model include modeling rating migration probability for point-in-time probability of default term structure for International Financial Reporting Standard 9 expected credit loss estimation and Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review stress testing. Unlike the rating transition model based on the Merton model, which allows only one sensitivity Print ISSN 1753-9579 j Online ISSN 1753-9587 © 2017 Infopro Digital Risk (IP) Limited 1 Copyright © 2017 Inf i i To subscribe to a Risk Journal visit subscriptions.risk.net/journals or email info@risk.net","PeriodicalId":43447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Model Validation","volume":"53 1","pages":"19-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian analysis in an aggregate loss model: validation of the structure functions\",\"authors\":\"A. Hernández-Bastida, J. M. Pérez-Sánchez, M. Fernández-Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.21314/JRMV.2017.176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Common ordinal models, including the ordered logit model and the continuation ratio model, are formulated by a common score (ie, a linear combination of given explanatory variables) plus rank-specific intercepts. Sensitivity to the common score is generally not differentiated between rank outcomes. We propose an ordinal model based on forward ordinal probabilities for rank outcomes. In addition to the common score and intercepts, the forward ordinal probabilities are formulated by the rankand rating-specific sensitivity (for a risk-rated portfolio). This rank-specific sensitivity allows a risk rating to respond to its migrations to default, downgrade, stay and upgrade accordingly. A parameter estimation approach based on maximum likelihood for observing rank-outcome frequencies is proposed. Applications of the proposed model include modeling rating migration probability for point-in-time probability of default term structure for International Financial Reporting Standard 9 expected credit loss estimation and Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review stress testing. Unlike the rating transition model based on the Merton model, which allows only one sensitivity Print ISSN 1753-9579 j Online ISSN 1753-9587 © 2017 Infopro Digital Risk (IP) Limited 1 Copyright © 2017 Inf i i To subscribe to a Risk Journal visit subscriptions.risk.net/journals or email info@risk.net\",\"PeriodicalId\":43447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Risk Model Validation\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"19-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Risk Model Validation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21314/JRMV.2017.176\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Model Validation","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JRMV.2017.176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

常见的有序模型,包括有序logit模型和连续比模型,是由一个共同的分数(即给定解释变量的线性组合)加上等级特定的截距来表述的。对共同分数的敏感性通常不区分等级结果。我们提出了一个基于前向有序概率的排序结果模型。除了常见的得分和截距之外,前向顺序概率是由等级评级特定的敏感性(对于风险评级的投资组合)制定的。这种特定于等级的敏感性允许风险评级对其迁移到违约、降级、保留和升级做出相应的响应。提出了一种基于极大似然的观测秩-结果频率的参数估计方法。该模型的应用包括对国际财务报告准则第9号预期信用损失估计和综合资本分析与审查压力测试中违约期限结构的时间点概率的评级迁移概率建模。与基于Merton模型的评级转换模型不同,该模型只允许一种灵敏度打印ISSN 1753-9579 j Online ISSN 1753-9587©2017 Infopro Digital Risk (IP) Limited 1版权所有©2017 infi i订阅风险期刊访问subscriptions.risk.net/journals或发送电子邮件info@risk.net
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bayesian analysis in an aggregate loss model: validation of the structure functions
Common ordinal models, including the ordered logit model and the continuation ratio model, are formulated by a common score (ie, a linear combination of given explanatory variables) plus rank-specific intercepts. Sensitivity to the common score is generally not differentiated between rank outcomes. We propose an ordinal model based on forward ordinal probabilities for rank outcomes. In addition to the common score and intercepts, the forward ordinal probabilities are formulated by the rankand rating-specific sensitivity (for a risk-rated portfolio). This rank-specific sensitivity allows a risk rating to respond to its migrations to default, downgrade, stay and upgrade accordingly. A parameter estimation approach based on maximum likelihood for observing rank-outcome frequencies is proposed. Applications of the proposed model include modeling rating migration probability for point-in-time probability of default term structure for International Financial Reporting Standard 9 expected credit loss estimation and Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review stress testing. Unlike the rating transition model based on the Merton model, which allows only one sensitivity Print ISSN 1753-9579 j Online ISSN 1753-9587 © 2017 Infopro Digital Risk (IP) Limited 1 Copyright © 2017 Inf i i To subscribe to a Risk Journal visit subscriptions.risk.net/journals or email info@risk.net
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: As monetary institutions rely greatly on economic and financial models for a wide array of applications, model validation has become progressively inventive within the field of risk. The Journal of Risk Model Validation focuses on the implementation and validation of risk models, and aims to provide a greater understanding of key issues including the empirical evaluation of existing models, pitfalls in model validation and the development of new methods. We also publish papers on back-testing. Our main field of application is in credit risk modelling but we are happy to consider any issues of risk model validation for any financial asset class. The Journal of Risk Model Validation considers submissions in the form of research papers on topics including, but not limited to: Empirical model evaluation studies Backtesting studies Stress-testing studies New methods of model validation/backtesting/stress-testing Best practices in model development, deployment, production and maintenance Pitfalls in model validation techniques (all types of risk, forecasting, pricing and rating)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信