从不满的自我民族志看自我在自我学习中的地位

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Oren Ergas, Jason K. Ritter
{"title":"从不满的自我民族志看自我在自我学习中的地位","authors":"Oren Ergas, Jason K. Ritter","doi":"10.1080/17425964.2020.1836486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article questions some of the premises undergirding the discourse of self-study, particularly focusing on its treatment of ‘self’. We examine the ontology, authority and ethics of self as they emerge from Oren’s reading of self-study literature in light of his scholarship of and experience in contemplative education. Having focused on studying and teaching mindfulness in teacher education, Oren had been an insider to ‘the study of self’ yet an outsider to ‘self-study’ when he stumbled upon the S-STEP SIG during AERA 2018. His hopes of finally finding a SIG focused on the self were high; however, during the presentations he attended, he became perplexed and disappointed as ‘self’ emerged as somewhat peripheral to the matter he had assumed to be at stake. Written as an autoethnography, this paper describes his search for the sources of his discontents aided by Jason, a self-study insider who shares some of his ideas. Responding to calls for self-study that advocate educational change in a broad sense, we point to some ontological, epistemological and ethical commitments centering around self that may have been limiting self-study. We suggest that some of them can be rethought and point to ways in which this can lead to new possibilities for self-study and its expanded impact.","PeriodicalId":45793,"journal":{"name":"Studying Teacher Education","volume":"36 1","pages":"4 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expanding the Place of Self in Self-Study through an Autoethnography of Discontents\",\"authors\":\"Oren Ergas, Jason K. Ritter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425964.2020.1836486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article questions some of the premises undergirding the discourse of self-study, particularly focusing on its treatment of ‘self’. We examine the ontology, authority and ethics of self as they emerge from Oren’s reading of self-study literature in light of his scholarship of and experience in contemplative education. Having focused on studying and teaching mindfulness in teacher education, Oren had been an insider to ‘the study of self’ yet an outsider to ‘self-study’ when he stumbled upon the S-STEP SIG during AERA 2018. His hopes of finally finding a SIG focused on the self were high; however, during the presentations he attended, he became perplexed and disappointed as ‘self’ emerged as somewhat peripheral to the matter he had assumed to be at stake. Written as an autoethnography, this paper describes his search for the sources of his discontents aided by Jason, a self-study insider who shares some of his ideas. Responding to calls for self-study that advocate educational change in a broad sense, we point to some ontological, epistemological and ethical commitments centering around self that may have been limiting self-study. We suggest that some of them can be rethought and point to ways in which this can lead to new possibilities for self-study and its expanded impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studying Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"4 - 21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studying Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2020.1836486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studying Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2020.1836486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文质疑了一些支撑自学话语的前提,尤其关注其对“自我”的处理。我们考察本体论,权威和道德的自我,因为他们出现在奥伦的阅读自学文学在他的学术和经验的沉思教育。Oren专注于研究和教授教师教育中的正念,在AERA 2018期间偶然发现S-STEP SIG时,他是“自我研究”的局内人,但却是“自学”的局外人。他对最终找到一个专注于自我的SIG抱有很高的希望;然而,在他参加的演讲中,他感到困惑和失望,因为“自我”在他认为至关重要的问题中显得有些次要。这篇论文是一本自传式的民族志,描述了他在杰森的帮助下寻找不满的根源,杰森是一位自学的内部人士,他分享了他的一些想法。为了回应倡导广义教育变革的自学呼声,我们指出了一些围绕自我的本体论、认识论和伦理承诺,这些承诺可能限制了自学。我们建议可以重新思考其中的一些,并指出这些方法可以为自学带来新的可能性及其扩大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expanding the Place of Self in Self-Study through an Autoethnography of Discontents
ABSTRACT This article questions some of the premises undergirding the discourse of self-study, particularly focusing on its treatment of ‘self’. We examine the ontology, authority and ethics of self as they emerge from Oren’s reading of self-study literature in light of his scholarship of and experience in contemplative education. Having focused on studying and teaching mindfulness in teacher education, Oren had been an insider to ‘the study of self’ yet an outsider to ‘self-study’ when he stumbled upon the S-STEP SIG during AERA 2018. His hopes of finally finding a SIG focused on the self were high; however, during the presentations he attended, he became perplexed and disappointed as ‘self’ emerged as somewhat peripheral to the matter he had assumed to be at stake. Written as an autoethnography, this paper describes his search for the sources of his discontents aided by Jason, a self-study insider who shares some of his ideas. Responding to calls for self-study that advocate educational change in a broad sense, we point to some ontological, epistemological and ethical commitments centering around self that may have been limiting self-study. We suggest that some of them can be rethought and point to ways in which this can lead to new possibilities for self-study and its expanded impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studying Teacher Education
Studying Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
43.80%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Studying Teacher Education invites submissions from authors who have a strong interest in improving the quality of teaching generally and of teacher education in particular. The central purpose of the journal is to disseminate high-quality research and dialogue in self-study of teacher education practices. Thus the journal is primarily a forum for teacher educators who work in contexts and programs of teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信