利用耗散消声器降低离心式通风机职业性噪声的现场研究

IF 0.9 Q4 ACOUSTICS
A. Variani, Masoumeh Ghorbanide, S. Zare, Saeid Ahmadi, Zahra Hashemi
{"title":"利用耗散消声器降低离心式通风机职业性噪声的现场研究","authors":"A. Variani, Masoumeh Ghorbanide, S. Zare, Saeid Ahmadi, Zahra Hashemi","doi":"10.32604/SV.2021.08930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acoustic performance of dissipative silencer was evaluated to determine the effectiveness of perforated duct porosity and absorbent material density in reducing occupational noise exposure propagated from centrifugal fan. Design charts were applied to predict noise reduction and length of a dissipative silencer. Dissipative silencers with various punched duct porosity (14%, 30% and 40%) and sound absorbent density (80 Kg/m, 120 Kg/m, and 140 Kg/m) were designed and fabricated. According to ISO9612 and ISO11820, noise level was measured before and after installing all nine test silencers at fixed workstations around the discharge side of a centrifugal fan in a manufacturing plant. On average, the noise level at the discharge side of a fan without silencer was measured to be 93.6 dBA, whereas it was significantly mitigated by 67.4 dBA to 70.1 dBA after installing all silencers. Dynamic insertion loss for a dissipative silencer with 100 cm length was predicted to be 27.9 dB, which was in agreement with experimental ones. Although, there was no significant differences between insertion loss of silencers, the one with 30% porosity and 120 Kg/m rock wool density had the highest insertion loss of 26.2 dBA. Dissipative silencers noticeably reduced centrifugal fan noise exposures. Increasing sound absorbent density and duct porosity up to a certain limit could probably be effective in noise reduction of dissipative silencers.","PeriodicalId":49496,"journal":{"name":"Sound and Vibration","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Occupational Noise Propagated from Centrifugal Fan through Dissipative Silencers: A Field Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Variani, Masoumeh Ghorbanide, S. Zare, Saeid Ahmadi, Zahra Hashemi\",\"doi\":\"10.32604/SV.2021.08930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Acoustic performance of dissipative silencer was evaluated to determine the effectiveness of perforated duct porosity and absorbent material density in reducing occupational noise exposure propagated from centrifugal fan. Design charts were applied to predict noise reduction and length of a dissipative silencer. Dissipative silencers with various punched duct porosity (14%, 30% and 40%) and sound absorbent density (80 Kg/m, 120 Kg/m, and 140 Kg/m) were designed and fabricated. According to ISO9612 and ISO11820, noise level was measured before and after installing all nine test silencers at fixed workstations around the discharge side of a centrifugal fan in a manufacturing plant. On average, the noise level at the discharge side of a fan without silencer was measured to be 93.6 dBA, whereas it was significantly mitigated by 67.4 dBA to 70.1 dBA after installing all silencers. Dynamic insertion loss for a dissipative silencer with 100 cm length was predicted to be 27.9 dB, which was in agreement with experimental ones. Although, there was no significant differences between insertion loss of silencers, the one with 30% porosity and 120 Kg/m rock wool density had the highest insertion loss of 26.2 dBA. Dissipative silencers noticeably reduced centrifugal fan noise exposures. Increasing sound absorbent density and duct porosity up to a certain limit could probably be effective in noise reduction of dissipative silencers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sound and Vibration\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sound and Vibration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32604/SV.2021.08930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sound and Vibration","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32604/SV.2021.08930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对耗散型消声器的声学性能进行评价,以确定孔管孔隙度和吸声材料密度对降低职业性噪声暴露的影响。设计图表应用于预测降噪和长度耗散消声器。设计和制作了不同孔隙率(14%、30%和40%)和吸声密度(80 Kg/m、120 Kg/m和140 Kg/m)的消声器。根据ISO9612和ISO11820,在制造工厂的离心风机排出侧周围的固定工作站安装所有九个测试消声器之前和之后测量噪声水平。在没有消声器的情况下,风扇排气侧的平均噪音水平为93.6 dBA,而在安装了所有消声器后,风扇排气侧的噪音水平显著降低了67.4 dBA至70.1 dBA。100 cm长度的耗散消声器的动态插入损失预测值为27.9 dB,与实验值基本一致。虽然不同消声器的插入损失没有显著差异,但孔隙率为30%、岩棉密度为120 Kg/m的消声器的插入损失最高,为26.2 dBA。耗散消声器明显减少了离心风扇的噪音暴露。将吸声密度和管道孔隙度提高到一定限度可能是耗散消声器降噪的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing Occupational Noise Propagated from Centrifugal Fan through Dissipative Silencers: A Field Study
Acoustic performance of dissipative silencer was evaluated to determine the effectiveness of perforated duct porosity and absorbent material density in reducing occupational noise exposure propagated from centrifugal fan. Design charts were applied to predict noise reduction and length of a dissipative silencer. Dissipative silencers with various punched duct porosity (14%, 30% and 40%) and sound absorbent density (80 Kg/m, 120 Kg/m, and 140 Kg/m) were designed and fabricated. According to ISO9612 and ISO11820, noise level was measured before and after installing all nine test silencers at fixed workstations around the discharge side of a centrifugal fan in a manufacturing plant. On average, the noise level at the discharge side of a fan without silencer was measured to be 93.6 dBA, whereas it was significantly mitigated by 67.4 dBA to 70.1 dBA after installing all silencers. Dynamic insertion loss for a dissipative silencer with 100 cm length was predicted to be 27.9 dB, which was in agreement with experimental ones. Although, there was no significant differences between insertion loss of silencers, the one with 30% porosity and 120 Kg/m rock wool density had the highest insertion loss of 26.2 dBA. Dissipative silencers noticeably reduced centrifugal fan noise exposures. Increasing sound absorbent density and duct porosity up to a certain limit could probably be effective in noise reduction of dissipative silencers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sound and Vibration
Sound and Vibration 物理-工程:机械
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sound & Vibration is a journal intended for individuals with broad-based interests in noise and vibration, dynamic measurements, structural analysis, computer-aided engineering, machinery reliability, and dynamic testing. The journal strives to publish referred papers reflecting the interests of research and practical engineering on any aspects of sound and vibration. Of particular interest are papers that report analytical, numerical and experimental methods of more relevance to practical applications. Papers are sought that contribute to the following general topics: -broad-based interests in noise and vibration- dynamic measurements- structural analysis- computer-aided engineering- machinery reliability- dynamic testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信