慢性肾脏疾病患者抗生素用药回顾及与标准选择药物的比较

Nevin Joseph, Alin Baby, Shaniya Thomas, J. Vilapurathu, Jobin Kunjumon
{"title":"慢性肾脏疾病患者抗生素用药回顾及与标准选择药物的比较","authors":"Nevin Joseph, Alin Baby, Shaniya Thomas, J. Vilapurathu, Jobin Kunjumon","doi":"10.26452/ijrps.v13i4.2898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The risk of morbidity and death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), formerly known as chronic renal failure (CRF), is increased by a number of comorbidities, including infections, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and anaemia. The second most common reason for death in this population is infections. Antibiotics can accumulate in the body and have harmful consequences when given to CKD patients without the necessary dosage modification and in an illogical manner. The purpose of this particular study was to compare the standard treatment protocol with the reasoning and prescribing patterns of antibiotics administered for infections in CKD patients staged 3-5 in the nephrology department of a single Center in Kerala’s Kottayam district. The medical records of 272 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were admitted to the nephrology department between November 2019 and November 2020 were examined as part of single-centred retrospective research that was created to address this. Surprisingly, just 45 percent  of the prescriptions were rational, while 55 percent of them were nonsensical. Additionally, we discovered that 23 percent of antibiotic selections went outside accepted therapeutic standards. Thus, we could conclude that the prescriber must use the utmost caution while prescribing to a patient with CKD to prevent future difficulties.","PeriodicalId":14285,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"340 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug Utilization Review of Antibiotics in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients and Comparison with the Standard Drug of Choice\",\"authors\":\"Nevin Joseph, Alin Baby, Shaniya Thomas, J. Vilapurathu, Jobin Kunjumon\",\"doi\":\"10.26452/ijrps.v13i4.2898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The risk of morbidity and death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), formerly known as chronic renal failure (CRF), is increased by a number of comorbidities, including infections, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and anaemia. The second most common reason for death in this population is infections. Antibiotics can accumulate in the body and have harmful consequences when given to CKD patients without the necessary dosage modification and in an illogical manner. The purpose of this particular study was to compare the standard treatment protocol with the reasoning and prescribing patterns of antibiotics administered for infections in CKD patients staged 3-5 in the nephrology department of a single Center in Kerala’s Kottayam district. The medical records of 272 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were admitted to the nephrology department between November 2019 and November 2020 were examined as part of single-centred retrospective research that was created to address this. Surprisingly, just 45 percent  of the prescriptions were rational, while 55 percent of them were nonsensical. Additionally, we discovered that 23 percent of antibiotic selections went outside accepted therapeutic standards. Thus, we could conclude that the prescriber must use the utmost caution while prescribing to a patient with CKD to prevent future difficulties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"340 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v13i4.2898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v13i4.2898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)(以前称为慢性肾衰竭(CRF))患者的发病率和死亡风险因许多合并症而增加,包括感染、心血管疾病(CVD)和贫血。这一人群中第二个最常见的死亡原因是感染。如果没有适当的剂量调整和不合逻辑的方式给CKD患者服用抗生素,会在体内积累并产生有害的后果。这项特殊研究的目的是比较喀拉拉邦Kottayam地区单一中心肾内科3-5期CKD患者感染的标准治疗方案与抗生素的推理和处方模式。作为解决这一问题的单中心回顾性研究的一部分,研究人员检查了2019年11月至2020年11月期间入住肾脏病科的272名符合纳入和排除标准的患者的医疗记录。令人惊讶的是,只有45%的处方是合理的,而55%的处方是荒谬的。此外,我们发现23%的抗生素选择超出了公认的治疗标准。因此,我们可以得出结论,开处方者在给CKD患者开处方时必须非常谨慎,以防止未来的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drug Utilization Review of Antibiotics in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients and Comparison with the Standard Drug of Choice
The risk of morbidity and death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), formerly known as chronic renal failure (CRF), is increased by a number of comorbidities, including infections, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and anaemia. The second most common reason for death in this population is infections. Antibiotics can accumulate in the body and have harmful consequences when given to CKD patients without the necessary dosage modification and in an illogical manner. The purpose of this particular study was to compare the standard treatment protocol with the reasoning and prescribing patterns of antibiotics administered for infections in CKD patients staged 3-5 in the nephrology department of a single Center in Kerala’s Kottayam district. The medical records of 272 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were admitted to the nephrology department between November 2019 and November 2020 were examined as part of single-centred retrospective research that was created to address this. Surprisingly, just 45 percent  of the prescriptions were rational, while 55 percent of them were nonsensical. Additionally, we discovered that 23 percent of antibiotic selections went outside accepted therapeutic standards. Thus, we could conclude that the prescriber must use the utmost caution while prescribing to a patient with CKD to prevent future difficulties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信