意外滞留异物:受大流行影响的不良事件。个案系列及文献回顾

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
A. Seabra, Aline Brenner de Souza, Renata Silva Artioli, Raniel Tagaytayan, W. Berends, Janelle Sanders, T. Vivas-Buitrago, Karen Hoenig Rigamonti, D. Rigamonti
{"title":"意外滞留异物:受大流行影响的不良事件。个案系列及文献回顾","authors":"A. Seabra, Aline Brenner de Souza, Renata Silva Artioli, Raniel Tagaytayan, W. Berends, Janelle Sanders, T. Vivas-Buitrago, Karen Hoenig Rigamonti, D. Rigamonti","doi":"10.1177/25160435231185437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite being recognized as a preventable serious adverse event more than a century ago, Unintentionally Retained Foreign Objects (URFOs) continue to occur. They, in fact, remain the second most common Sentinel Event (SE) reported to The Joint Commission (TJC). A large private Hospital, after many years of URFO-free practice, experienced four (4) cases of URFOs during a 12-month period (March 9, 2021–March 4, 2022). Three cases occurred in the Operating Room (OR), and one case occurred in Labor & Delivery. All four cases involved the abdomen. The URFO was a sponge in two cases, a retractor wrapped in a pad in one case, and a surgical specimen in one case. Our review confirmed that the characteristics of our cases were similar to those reported by the Joint Commission. The main contributing factor was the closure of the wound without performing the sponge/instrument count. This safety breach resulted from a combination of factors: the inexperience of the nursing staff caused by a dramatic 40% turnover during the pandemic, the lack of assigned responsibility to perform the counting, and the willingness of the surgeon to skip the count. To address the main factors, we implemented a multipronged approach that includes the following: standardization of the protocols of sponge counting, hand-off with shift change, and of double surgical team involvement; assignment of the counting responsibility to two nurses; and education of the new nurses and of independent practitioners about the OR procedures with monitoring of correct implementation.","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unintentionally retained foreign objects (URFOs): Adverse events influenced by the pandemic. A case series and literature review\",\"authors\":\"A. Seabra, Aline Brenner de Souza, Renata Silva Artioli, Raniel Tagaytayan, W. Berends, Janelle Sanders, T. Vivas-Buitrago, Karen Hoenig Rigamonti, D. Rigamonti\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25160435231185437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite being recognized as a preventable serious adverse event more than a century ago, Unintentionally Retained Foreign Objects (URFOs) continue to occur. They, in fact, remain the second most common Sentinel Event (SE) reported to The Joint Commission (TJC). A large private Hospital, after many years of URFO-free practice, experienced four (4) cases of URFOs during a 12-month period (March 9, 2021–March 4, 2022). Three cases occurred in the Operating Room (OR), and one case occurred in Labor & Delivery. All four cases involved the abdomen. The URFO was a sponge in two cases, a retractor wrapped in a pad in one case, and a surgical specimen in one case. Our review confirmed that the characteristics of our cases were similar to those reported by the Joint Commission. The main contributing factor was the closure of the wound without performing the sponge/instrument count. This safety breach resulted from a combination of factors: the inexperience of the nursing staff caused by a dramatic 40% turnover during the pandemic, the lack of assigned responsibility to perform the counting, and the willingness of the surgeon to skip the count. To address the main factors, we implemented a multipronged approach that includes the following: standardization of the protocols of sponge counting, hand-off with shift change, and of double surgical team involvement; assignment of the counting responsibility to two nurses; and education of the new nurses and of independent practitioners about the OR procedures with monitoring of correct implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of patient safety and risk management\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of patient safety and risk management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435231185437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435231185437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在一个多世纪前就被认为是一种可预防的严重不良事件,但无意中残留的异物(URFOs)仍在发生。事实上,它们仍然是报告给联合委员会(TJC)的第二大常见哨兵事件(SE)。一家大型私立医院,经过多年无不明飞行物的实践,在12个月内(2021年3月9日至2022年3月4日)经历了4例不明飞行物病例。3例发生在手术室,1例发生在产房。所有4例病例均涉及腹部。其中2例为海绵,1例为用垫包裹的牵开器,1例为手术标本。我们的审查证实,我们的案件的特点与联合委员会报告的情况相似。主要影响因素是未进行海绵/器械计数的伤口闭合。这一安全漏洞是由多种因素共同造成的:大流行期间40%的人员流动率导致护理人员缺乏经验,缺乏指定的清点职责,以及外科医生愿意跳过清点。为了解决主要因素,我们实施了一种多管齐下的方法,包括以下内容:标准化海绵计数、轮班交接和双手术团队参与的协议;将点钞职责分配给两位护士;对新护士和独立执业医师进行手术室程序教育,并监督其正确实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unintentionally retained foreign objects (URFOs): Adverse events influenced by the pandemic. A case series and literature review
Despite being recognized as a preventable serious adverse event more than a century ago, Unintentionally Retained Foreign Objects (URFOs) continue to occur. They, in fact, remain the second most common Sentinel Event (SE) reported to The Joint Commission (TJC). A large private Hospital, after many years of URFO-free practice, experienced four (4) cases of URFOs during a 12-month period (March 9, 2021–March 4, 2022). Three cases occurred in the Operating Room (OR), and one case occurred in Labor & Delivery. All four cases involved the abdomen. The URFO was a sponge in two cases, a retractor wrapped in a pad in one case, and a surgical specimen in one case. Our review confirmed that the characteristics of our cases were similar to those reported by the Joint Commission. The main contributing factor was the closure of the wound without performing the sponge/instrument count. This safety breach resulted from a combination of factors: the inexperience of the nursing staff caused by a dramatic 40% turnover during the pandemic, the lack of assigned responsibility to perform the counting, and the willingness of the surgeon to skip the count. To address the main factors, we implemented a multipronged approach that includes the following: standardization of the protocols of sponge counting, hand-off with shift change, and of double surgical team involvement; assignment of the counting responsibility to two nurses; and education of the new nurses and of independent practitioners about the OR procedures with monitoring of correct implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信