大学如何鼓励公平学生自我披露?

Q4 Social Sciences
Colin Clark, U. Sydney, Rita Kusevskis-Hayes, M. Wilkinson
{"title":"大学如何鼓励公平学生自我披露?","authors":"Colin Clark, U. Sydney, Rita Kusevskis-Hayes, M. Wilkinson","doi":"10.30688/JANZSSA.2019.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper extends upon a previous study into reasons behind student non-disclosure of equity status (Clark, Kusevskis-Hayes & Wilkinson, 2018). Based on findings from this previous study, this paper proposes good practice guidelines for universities to encourage self-disclosure by students in equity cohorts—Indigenous students, students with disabilities and those from non-English-speaking backgrounds (NESB). The previously published 12-month study, reporting on an equity staff survey on the subject of current university practices and student motivations for disclosure and reasons for concealing equity status, revealed that the primary reasons for disclosure versus non-disclosure varied between these three groups. Indigenous students were influenced by pride in identity versus popular perceptions of special treatment and may perceive Indigenous programs as primarily intended to achieve bureaucratic goals and meet “diversity” targets (Sullivan, 2008). Students with disabilities appreciated adjustments, but often waited until a crisis moment before seeking help. We advocate removal of barriers rather than a ‘medical model’ of support (Shakespeare and Watson, 2002). NESB students were least likely to disclose, because in many cases disclosure was not necessary to receive assistance, or no targeted assistance was available despite the apparent frustration of teaching staff (Fildes et al. 2010). The guidelines urge universities to adopt inclusive practices to reduce the need for self-disclosure, and to define equity groups in a practical and understandable way. Universities should educate staff and students to improve understanding of equity groups. Where disclosure is necessary, universities should offer options for levels of disclosure so students can retain control of their data. They should explain equity programs and services with clear guidelines for benefits and preserving confidentiality. Finally, they should explain the need for disclosure and allow noncommittal responses during enrolment, with later follow up.","PeriodicalId":39085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Can Universities Encourage Self-Disclosure by Equity Students?\",\"authors\":\"Colin Clark, U. Sydney, Rita Kusevskis-Hayes, M. Wilkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.30688/JANZSSA.2019.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper extends upon a previous study into reasons behind student non-disclosure of equity status (Clark, Kusevskis-Hayes & Wilkinson, 2018). Based on findings from this previous study, this paper proposes good practice guidelines for universities to encourage self-disclosure by students in equity cohorts—Indigenous students, students with disabilities and those from non-English-speaking backgrounds (NESB). The previously published 12-month study, reporting on an equity staff survey on the subject of current university practices and student motivations for disclosure and reasons for concealing equity status, revealed that the primary reasons for disclosure versus non-disclosure varied between these three groups. Indigenous students were influenced by pride in identity versus popular perceptions of special treatment and may perceive Indigenous programs as primarily intended to achieve bureaucratic goals and meet “diversity” targets (Sullivan, 2008). Students with disabilities appreciated adjustments, but often waited until a crisis moment before seeking help. We advocate removal of barriers rather than a ‘medical model’ of support (Shakespeare and Watson, 2002). NESB students were least likely to disclose, because in many cases disclosure was not necessary to receive assistance, or no targeted assistance was available despite the apparent frustration of teaching staff (Fildes et al. 2010). The guidelines urge universities to adopt inclusive practices to reduce the need for self-disclosure, and to define equity groups in a practical and understandable way. Universities should educate staff and students to improve understanding of equity groups. Where disclosure is necessary, universities should offer options for levels of disclosure so students can retain control of their data. They should explain equity programs and services with clear guidelines for benefits and preserving confidentiality. Finally, they should explain the need for disclosure and allow noncommittal responses during enrolment, with later follow up.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30688/JANZSSA.2019.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30688/JANZSSA.2019.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文在之前对学生不披露股权状况背后原因的研究的基础上进行了扩展(Clark, kusevski - hayes & Wilkinson, 2018)。基于先前的研究结果,本文提出了大学鼓励平等群体学生(土著学生、残疾学生和非英语背景学生)自我披露的良好实践指南。先前发表的一项为期12个月的研究报告,报告了一项关于当前大学实践和学生披露动机以及隐瞒公平状况的原因的公平工作人员调查,揭示了这三组人披露与不披露的主要原因各不相同。土著学生受到身份自豪感与普遍认为的特殊待遇的影响,他们可能认为土著项目主要是为了实现官僚主义目标和满足“多样性”目标(Sullivan, 2008)。残疾学生喜欢调整,但往往等到危机时刻才寻求帮助。我们主张消除障碍,而不是“医疗模式”的支持(莎士比亚和沃森,2002年)。NESB学生最不可能披露,因为在许多情况下,披露并不是获得帮助的必要条件,或者尽管教学人员明显感到沮丧,但没有针对性的帮助(Fildes et al. 2010)。该指南敦促大学采取包容性做法,以减少自我披露的必要性,并以一种实际和可理解的方式定义公平群体。大学应该教育职员和学生提高对平等群体的认识。在有必要披露信息的地方,大学应该提供不同披露程度的选择,这样学生就可以保留对自己数据的控制权。他们应该解释公平的项目和服务,明确的利益指导方针和保密。最后,他们应该解释披露的必要性,并允许在登记期间作出不明确的答复,随后进行随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Can Universities Encourage Self-Disclosure by Equity Students?
This paper extends upon a previous study into reasons behind student non-disclosure of equity status (Clark, Kusevskis-Hayes & Wilkinson, 2018). Based on findings from this previous study, this paper proposes good practice guidelines for universities to encourage self-disclosure by students in equity cohorts—Indigenous students, students with disabilities and those from non-English-speaking backgrounds (NESB). The previously published 12-month study, reporting on an equity staff survey on the subject of current university practices and student motivations for disclosure and reasons for concealing equity status, revealed that the primary reasons for disclosure versus non-disclosure varied between these three groups. Indigenous students were influenced by pride in identity versus popular perceptions of special treatment and may perceive Indigenous programs as primarily intended to achieve bureaucratic goals and meet “diversity” targets (Sullivan, 2008). Students with disabilities appreciated adjustments, but often waited until a crisis moment before seeking help. We advocate removal of barriers rather than a ‘medical model’ of support (Shakespeare and Watson, 2002). NESB students were least likely to disclose, because in many cases disclosure was not necessary to receive assistance, or no targeted assistance was available despite the apparent frustration of teaching staff (Fildes et al. 2010). The guidelines urge universities to adopt inclusive practices to reduce the need for self-disclosure, and to define equity groups in a practical and understandable way. Universities should educate staff and students to improve understanding of equity groups. Where disclosure is necessary, universities should offer options for levels of disclosure so students can retain control of their data. They should explain equity programs and services with clear guidelines for benefits and preserving confidentiality. Finally, they should explain the need for disclosure and allow noncommittal responses during enrolment, with later follow up.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信