{"title":"航运单据数字化展望","authors":"A. Y. Churilov","doi":"10.18572/1812-3929-2021-2-10-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of digital rights as objects of civil rights has given rise to the necessity of studying the possibility of the existence of digital documents of title. In the paper, the author compared documents of title as commercial securities and digital rights, in particular, utilitarian ones. The author made a conclusion that it is not possible to recognize the utilitarian digital law as a negotiable document of title, and its transfer — the transfer of an item within the meaning of Art. 224 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":81750,"journal":{"name":"Jurist (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shipping Document Digitization Prospects\",\"authors\":\"A. Y. Churilov\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-3929-2021-2-10-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The emergence of digital rights as objects of civil rights has given rise to the necessity of studying the possibility of the existence of digital documents of title. In the paper, the author compared documents of title as commercial securities and digital rights, in particular, utilitarian ones. The author made a conclusion that it is not possible to recognize the utilitarian digital law as a negotiable document of title, and its transfer — the transfer of an item within the meaning of Art. 224 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurist (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurist (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2021-2-10-15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurist (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2021-2-10-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The emergence of digital rights as objects of civil rights has given rise to the necessity of studying the possibility of the existence of digital documents of title. In the paper, the author compared documents of title as commercial securities and digital rights, in particular, utilitarian ones. The author made a conclusion that it is not possible to recognize the utilitarian digital law as a negotiable document of title, and its transfer — the transfer of an item within the meaning of Art. 224 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
