{"title":"常见的经验例程。作为制作人的斯宾诺莎艺术家","authors":"D. Tatián","doi":"10.32735/s0718-2201202000050795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work explores the status of art in the philosophy of Spinoza (aspect scarcely studied by critics), within the framework of the Copernican revolution that gives rise to aesthetics (the “secondary qualities” are not qualities of objects but effects in the subjects who perceive) and the Dutch Baroque. Although the Spinozist thought is inscribed in the anthropological conversion by virtue of which beauty turns out to be an effect on the subject and not a property of objects, its understanding of art is unassimilable to \"aesthetics\" as a differentiated and autonomous area that it was consolidated in the eighteenth century, and rather conceived art integrated to life and common experience –at the same time, as praxis of bodily origin within the reach of anyone, presents points of contact with the historical avant-gardes of the twentieth century–. Spinoza conceives the production of \"artworks\" less as an aesthetic fact than as a body activity ethically oriented to the good life.","PeriodicalId":43217,"journal":{"name":"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia","volume":"144 1","pages":"323-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rutinas de la experiencia común. El artista Spinoziano como productor\",\"authors\":\"D. Tatián\",\"doi\":\"10.32735/s0718-2201202000050795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present work explores the status of art in the philosophy of Spinoza (aspect scarcely studied by critics), within the framework of the Copernican revolution that gives rise to aesthetics (the “secondary qualities” are not qualities of objects but effects in the subjects who perceive) and the Dutch Baroque. Although the Spinozist thought is inscribed in the anthropological conversion by virtue of which beauty turns out to be an effect on the subject and not a property of objects, its understanding of art is unassimilable to \\\"aesthetics\\\" as a differentiated and autonomous area that it was consolidated in the eighteenth century, and rather conceived art integrated to life and common experience –at the same time, as praxis of bodily origin within the reach of anyone, presents points of contact with the historical avant-gardes of the twentieth century–. Spinoza conceives the production of \\\"artworks\\\" less as an aesthetic fact than as a body activity ethically oriented to the good life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"323-344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-2201202000050795\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-2201202000050795","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rutinas de la experiencia común. El artista Spinoziano como productor
The present work explores the status of art in the philosophy of Spinoza (aspect scarcely studied by critics), within the framework of the Copernican revolution that gives rise to aesthetics (the “secondary qualities” are not qualities of objects but effects in the subjects who perceive) and the Dutch Baroque. Although the Spinozist thought is inscribed in the anthropological conversion by virtue of which beauty turns out to be an effect on the subject and not a property of objects, its understanding of art is unassimilable to "aesthetics" as a differentiated and autonomous area that it was consolidated in the eighteenth century, and rather conceived art integrated to life and common experience –at the same time, as praxis of bodily origin within the reach of anyone, presents points of contact with the historical avant-gardes of the twentieth century–. Spinoza conceives the production of "artworks" less as an aesthetic fact than as a body activity ethically oriented to the good life.