迈向混合语言学习框架

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
CALICO Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1558/cj.22364
Jessica DeMolder, D. Wiseman, Charles Graham, Camellia Hill
{"title":"迈向混合语言学习框架","authors":"Jessica DeMolder, D. Wiseman, Charles Graham, Camellia Hill","doi":"10.1558/cj.22364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decades, but particularly as a response to the global pandemic, online language technologies have made blended approaches increasingly practical for the language learning classroom. Despite the growing interest in blended learning generally, research has shown an overemphasis on comparative studies (Goertler, 2019), and left the field with a lack of summative research in blended language learning (BLL). For this article, therefore, we reviewed 208 peer-reviewed studies on BLL to identify predominant scholarly trends, including gaps in the literature, and to encourage further investigation in targeted areas. We specifically advocate for scholarship that addresses language proficiency outcomes, connects the domains of language learning theory and blended instruction, and centers on design-based aims. We invite educators within blended education, foreign language acquisition, and other relevant fields to work collaboratively across disciplines, using our review as a springboard to develop a more complete BLL design framework to better use the affordances of technology to advance BLL.","PeriodicalId":46819,"journal":{"name":"CALICO Journal","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward Blended Language Learning Frameworks\",\"authors\":\"Jessica DeMolder, D. Wiseman, Charles Graham, Camellia Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/cj.22364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past decades, but particularly as a response to the global pandemic, online language technologies have made blended approaches increasingly practical for the language learning classroom. Despite the growing interest in blended learning generally, research has shown an overemphasis on comparative studies (Goertler, 2019), and left the field with a lack of summative research in blended language learning (BLL). For this article, therefore, we reviewed 208 peer-reviewed studies on BLL to identify predominant scholarly trends, including gaps in the literature, and to encourage further investigation in targeted areas. We specifically advocate for scholarship that addresses language proficiency outcomes, connects the domains of language learning theory and blended instruction, and centers on design-based aims. We invite educators within blended education, foreign language acquisition, and other relevant fields to work collaboratively across disciplines, using our review as a springboard to develop a more complete BLL design framework to better use the affordances of technology to advance BLL.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CALICO Journal\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CALICO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.22364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CALICO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.22364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,特别是作为对全球流行病的回应,在线语言技术使混合方法在语言学习课堂上越来越实用。尽管人们对混合学习越来越感兴趣,但研究过于强调比较研究(Goertler, 2019),并且缺乏对混合语言学习(BLL)的总结性研究。因此,在本文中,我们回顾了208篇关于BLL的同行评议研究,以确定主要的学术趋势,包括文献中的空白,并鼓励在目标领域进行进一步的研究。我们特别提倡关注语言能力结果的奖学金,将语言学习理论和混合教学领域联系起来,并以设计为基础的目标为中心。我们邀请混合教育、外语习得和其他相关领域的教育工作者跨学科合作,以我们的评估为跳板,开发更完整的语言教学法设计框架,以更好地利用技术的支持来推进语言教学法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward Blended Language Learning Frameworks
Over the past decades, but particularly as a response to the global pandemic, online language technologies have made blended approaches increasingly practical for the language learning classroom. Despite the growing interest in blended learning generally, research has shown an overemphasis on comparative studies (Goertler, 2019), and left the field with a lack of summative research in blended language learning (BLL). For this article, therefore, we reviewed 208 peer-reviewed studies on BLL to identify predominant scholarly trends, including gaps in the literature, and to encourage further investigation in targeted areas. We specifically advocate for scholarship that addresses language proficiency outcomes, connects the domains of language learning theory and blended instruction, and centers on design-based aims. We invite educators within blended education, foreign language acquisition, and other relevant fields to work collaboratively across disciplines, using our review as a springboard to develop a more complete BLL design framework to better use the affordances of technology to advance BLL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CALICO Journal
CALICO Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信