{"title":"面对面递送与片剂递送患者健康问卷-2在初级保健中筛查抑郁症的比较","authors":"M. Weimer, M. A. Maurer, A. Baus","doi":"10.21885/wvmj.2020.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Primary care practitioners have long been encouraged to screen adult patients for depression, as reflected by national guidelines from the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and recent federal initiatives aimed at bolstering screening rates. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2, or PHQ-2, is a simple, commonly used tool for depression screening. However, results can be skewed due to variability in the way in which questions are delivered. This study, conducted in seven West Virginia primary care centers from August 2016 to October 2017, evaluated delivery of the PHQ-2 via face-to-face administration by clinical staff compared to a scripted, video-based delivery using a tablet computer, here called the electronic PHQ-2 or ePHQ-2. This observational study finds a significant, increased difference in positive screening results when administered face-to-face by clinical staff compared to a scripted, tablet-based delivery (X2 (1, N = 655) = 5.32, p = 0.02). Given this important difference between groups, this study highlights the need for further exploration into the fidelity of PHQ-2 delivery and acceptance of such technology among patients and health care providers.","PeriodicalId":23032,"journal":{"name":"The West Virginia medical journal","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Face-to-Face Versus Tablet-Based Delivery of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 Screening for Depression in Primary Care\",\"authors\":\"M. Weimer, M. A. Maurer, A. Baus\",\"doi\":\"10.21885/wvmj.2020.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Primary care practitioners have long been encouraged to screen adult patients for depression, as reflected by national guidelines from the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and recent federal initiatives aimed at bolstering screening rates. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2, or PHQ-2, is a simple, commonly used tool for depression screening. However, results can be skewed due to variability in the way in which questions are delivered. This study, conducted in seven West Virginia primary care centers from August 2016 to October 2017, evaluated delivery of the PHQ-2 via face-to-face administration by clinical staff compared to a scripted, video-based delivery using a tablet computer, here called the electronic PHQ-2 or ePHQ-2. This observational study finds a significant, increased difference in positive screening results when administered face-to-face by clinical staff compared to a scripted, tablet-based delivery (X2 (1, N = 655) = 5.32, p = 0.02). Given this important difference between groups, this study highlights the need for further exploration into the fidelity of PHQ-2 delivery and acceptance of such technology among patients and health care providers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The West Virginia medical journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The West Virginia medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21885/wvmj.2020.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The West Virginia medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21885/wvmj.2020.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
从美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)的国家指导方针和最近旨在提高筛查率的联邦倡议中可以看出,初级保健从业人员长期以来一直被鼓励筛查成年抑郁症患者。患者健康问卷-2(简称PHQ-2)是一种简单、常用的抑郁症筛查工具。然而,由于提问方式的变化,结果可能会有所偏差。这项研究于2016年8月至2017年10月在西弗吉尼亚州的七个初级保健中心进行,评估了通过临床工作人员面对面给药的PHQ-2与使用平板电脑(这里称为电子PHQ-2或ePHQ-2)的脚本化、基于视频的给药方式的比较。这项观察性研究发现,与基于脚本的片剂给药相比,由临床人员面对面给药的阳性筛查结果差异显著增加(X2 (1, N = 655) = 5.32, p = 0.02)。鉴于两组之间的这一重要差异,本研究强调需要进一步探索PHQ-2输送的保真度以及患者和医疗保健提供者对这种技术的接受程度。
A Comparison of Face-to-Face Versus Tablet-Based Delivery of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 Screening for Depression in Primary Care
Primary care practitioners have long been encouraged to screen adult patients for depression, as reflected by national guidelines from the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and recent federal initiatives aimed at bolstering screening rates. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2, or PHQ-2, is a simple, commonly used tool for depression screening. However, results can be skewed due to variability in the way in which questions are delivered. This study, conducted in seven West Virginia primary care centers from August 2016 to October 2017, evaluated delivery of the PHQ-2 via face-to-face administration by clinical staff compared to a scripted, video-based delivery using a tablet computer, here called the electronic PHQ-2 or ePHQ-2. This observational study finds a significant, increased difference in positive screening results when administered face-to-face by clinical staff compared to a scripted, tablet-based delivery (X2 (1, N = 655) = 5.32, p = 0.02). Given this important difference between groups, this study highlights the need for further exploration into the fidelity of PHQ-2 delivery and acceptance of such technology among patients and health care providers.