{"title":"模拟英国硫沉积的长期趋势","authors":"D.S. Lee, R.D. Kingdon","doi":"10.1016/S1464-1909(01)00090-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>On the UK-scale, sulphur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) dry deposition has declined at a faster rate than SO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but S wet deposition has declined at a slower rate than emissions. Three hypotheses have been put forward to explain this non-linear response to changes in emissions: changes in the effective release height of emissions; oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> may have been oxidant limited in previous years; the canopy resistance of SO<sub>2</sub> has changed in response to changing ammonia concentrations. Of these three hypotheses, the first has been tested here using a 10-layer Lagrangian acid deposition model. The model reproduced the rate of decline of observed total S deposition but not the magnitude. The mismatch in magnitude between modelled and observed UK S deposition is consistent with the model framework and its limitations. More importantly, the model did not reproduce the changes in the proportions of wet and dry deposition to the UK that have been observed using two different sets of UK emission data. The UK-derived emissions data show a small increase in the proportion of low-level SO<sub>2</sub> sources to the total and a small decrease in proportion of the high-level SO<sub>2</sub> sources over the period 1989–1994. These changes are not apparently consistent with observed changes in SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations nor changes in wet and dry S deposition. Thus, it is unsurprising that the modelling does not simulate the observed changes in fractions of wet and dry deposition. The current constraints of the modelling and the emissions data have the consequence that future scenarios of rates of change of total S deposition may be optimistic for locations that are dominated by wet deposition, remote from sources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101025,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere","volume":"26 10","pages":"Pages 813-817"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-1909(01)00090-9","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling long-term trends in UK sulphur deposition\",\"authors\":\"D.S. Lee, R.D. Kingdon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1464-1909(01)00090-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>On the UK-scale, sulphur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) dry deposition has declined at a faster rate than SO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but S wet deposition has declined at a slower rate than emissions. Three hypotheses have been put forward to explain this non-linear response to changes in emissions: changes in the effective release height of emissions; oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> may have been oxidant limited in previous years; the canopy resistance of SO<sub>2</sub> has changed in response to changing ammonia concentrations. Of these three hypotheses, the first has been tested here using a 10-layer Lagrangian acid deposition model. The model reproduced the rate of decline of observed total S deposition but not the magnitude. The mismatch in magnitude between modelled and observed UK S deposition is consistent with the model framework and its limitations. More importantly, the model did not reproduce the changes in the proportions of wet and dry deposition to the UK that have been observed using two different sets of UK emission data. The UK-derived emissions data show a small increase in the proportion of low-level SO<sub>2</sub> sources to the total and a small decrease in proportion of the high-level SO<sub>2</sub> sources over the period 1989–1994. These changes are not apparently consistent with observed changes in SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations nor changes in wet and dry S deposition. Thus, it is unsurprising that the modelling does not simulate the observed changes in fractions of wet and dry deposition. The current constraints of the modelling and the emissions data have the consequence that future scenarios of rates of change of total S deposition may be optimistic for locations that are dominated by wet deposition, remote from sources.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere\",\"volume\":\"26 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 813-817\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-1909(01)00090-9\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464190901000909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464190901000909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modelling long-term trends in UK sulphur deposition
On the UK-scale, sulphur dioxide (SO2) dry deposition has declined at a faster rate than SO2 emissions, but S wet deposition has declined at a slower rate than emissions. Three hypotheses have been put forward to explain this non-linear response to changes in emissions: changes in the effective release height of emissions; oxidation of SO2 may have been oxidant limited in previous years; the canopy resistance of SO2 has changed in response to changing ammonia concentrations. Of these three hypotheses, the first has been tested here using a 10-layer Lagrangian acid deposition model. The model reproduced the rate of decline of observed total S deposition but not the magnitude. The mismatch in magnitude between modelled and observed UK S deposition is consistent with the model framework and its limitations. More importantly, the model did not reproduce the changes in the proportions of wet and dry deposition to the UK that have been observed using two different sets of UK emission data. The UK-derived emissions data show a small increase in the proportion of low-level SO2 sources to the total and a small decrease in proportion of the high-level SO2 sources over the period 1989–1994. These changes are not apparently consistent with observed changes in SO2 concentrations nor changes in wet and dry S deposition. Thus, it is unsurprising that the modelling does not simulate the observed changes in fractions of wet and dry deposition. The current constraints of the modelling and the emissions data have the consequence that future scenarios of rates of change of total S deposition may be optimistic for locations that are dominated by wet deposition, remote from sources.