怀疑领导:校长在国家课程改革中塑造学校怀疑过程

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sherry Ganon-Shilon, Chen Schechter
{"title":"怀疑领导:校长在国家课程改革中塑造学校怀疑过程","authors":"Sherry Ganon-Shilon, Chen Schechter","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2022.2097650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Success of curriculum reforms calls for both collaborative learning and unlearning processes. Focusing on the latter, school doubting process, an innovative term, is used in this paper as an active framework for organisational unlearning through which educators question their existing mind-sets and unfreeze old approaches to teaching and learning. This qualitative study explores how high school principals shape a school doubting process during the implementation of a national curriculum reform. The study analyses qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 22 Israeli high school principals who have implemented a national curriculum reform from all school districts. The findings indicate two major themes and sub-themes: (1) Nurturing a collective unlearning culture: (a) restructuring school thinking; and (b) creating safe time and space for school doubting; (2) Building school capacity: (a) creating collective opportunities for knowledge and skill development; and (b) encouraging shared responsibility for innovation.","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"73 1","pages":"400 - 419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doubting leadership: principals shaping a school doubting process within a national curriculum reform\",\"authors\":\"Sherry Ganon-Shilon, Chen Schechter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220620.2022.2097650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Success of curriculum reforms calls for both collaborative learning and unlearning processes. Focusing on the latter, school doubting process, an innovative term, is used in this paper as an active framework for organisational unlearning through which educators question their existing mind-sets and unfreeze old approaches to teaching and learning. This qualitative study explores how high school principals shape a school doubting process during the implementation of a national curriculum reform. The study analyses qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 22 Israeli high school principals who have implemented a national curriculum reform from all school districts. The findings indicate two major themes and sub-themes: (1) Nurturing a collective unlearning culture: (a) restructuring school thinking; and (b) creating safe time and space for school doubting; (2) Building school capacity: (a) creating collective opportunities for knowledge and skill development; and (b) encouraging shared responsibility for innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Administration and History\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"400 - 419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Administration and History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2022.2097650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2022.2097650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

课程改革的成功既需要协作学习过程,也需要遗忘过程。关注后者,本文将学校怀疑过程(一个创新术语)用作组织遗忘的积极框架,通过该框架,教育者质疑他们现有的思维模式,并解冻旧的教学方法。本质性研究探讨高中校长在实施国家课程改革过程中如何塑造学校怀疑过程。该研究分析了对22名以色列高中校长进行的半结构化访谈的定性数据,这些校长实施了所有学区的全国课程改革。研究结果显示了两个主要主题和副主题:(1)培养集体遗忘文化;(a)重组学校思维;(b)为质疑学校创造安全的时间和空间;(2)建设学校能力:(a)创造知识和技能发展的集体机会;(b)鼓励共同承担创新责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Doubting leadership: principals shaping a school doubting process within a national curriculum reform
ABSTRACT Success of curriculum reforms calls for both collaborative learning and unlearning processes. Focusing on the latter, school doubting process, an innovative term, is used in this paper as an active framework for organisational unlearning through which educators question their existing mind-sets and unfreeze old approaches to teaching and learning. This qualitative study explores how high school principals shape a school doubting process during the implementation of a national curriculum reform. The study analyses qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 22 Israeli high school principals who have implemented a national curriculum reform from all school districts. The findings indicate two major themes and sub-themes: (1) Nurturing a collective unlearning culture: (a) restructuring school thinking; and (b) creating safe time and space for school doubting; (2) Building school capacity: (a) creating collective opportunities for knowledge and skill development; and (b) encouraging shared responsibility for innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Administration and History
Journal of Educational Administration and History EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信