测试与移动MT后期编辑应用程序的交互

IF 1.2 Q2 LINGUISTICS
O. Torres-Hostench, Joss Moorkens, Sharon O’Brien, Joris Vreeke
{"title":"测试与移动MT后期编辑应用程序的交互","authors":"O. Torres-Hostench, Joss Moorkens, Sharon O’Brien, Joris Vreeke","doi":"10.12807/TI.109202.2017.A09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kanjingo is a post-editing application for iOS devices developed at the ADAPT Centre (formerly CNGL) at Dublin City University (DCU). The first stage of user testing was conducted in 2014 (reported in O’Brien, Moorkens & Vreeke, 2014), and improvements were made based on the initial feedback. This abstract describes further exploratory testing based on the second iteration of the Kanjingo application. The new tests were designed with several aims: (1) testing Kanjingo for post-editing using the phone’s keyboard (2) testing Kanjingo for post-editing with voice input; (3) testing Kanjingo for revision of post-edited texts; (4) testing Kanjingo general usability; and (5) testing Kanjingo interface design. This paper presents the results of the various tests, issues identified, and ideas for improvements. For example, the use of Kanjingo for post-editing with voice input, one of the most innovative forms of interaction with MT in the test, worked much better than participants expected, and this mode of input was preferred for translating from scratch when MT quality was very poor, whereas post-editing short words or phrases was found to be faster with the iPhone keyboard. In addition, we present some reflections on the strengths and weaknesses of the testing methods employed.","PeriodicalId":44242,"journal":{"name":"Translation & Interpreting-The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing interaction with a Mobile MT post-editing app\",\"authors\":\"O. Torres-Hostench, Joss Moorkens, Sharon O’Brien, Joris Vreeke\",\"doi\":\"10.12807/TI.109202.2017.A09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kanjingo is a post-editing application for iOS devices developed at the ADAPT Centre (formerly CNGL) at Dublin City University (DCU). The first stage of user testing was conducted in 2014 (reported in O’Brien, Moorkens & Vreeke, 2014), and improvements were made based on the initial feedback. This abstract describes further exploratory testing based on the second iteration of the Kanjingo application. The new tests were designed with several aims: (1) testing Kanjingo for post-editing using the phone’s keyboard (2) testing Kanjingo for post-editing with voice input; (3) testing Kanjingo for revision of post-edited texts; (4) testing Kanjingo general usability; and (5) testing Kanjingo interface design. This paper presents the results of the various tests, issues identified, and ideas for improvements. For example, the use of Kanjingo for post-editing with voice input, one of the most innovative forms of interaction with MT in the test, worked much better than participants expected, and this mode of input was preferred for translating from scratch when MT quality was very poor, whereas post-editing short words or phrases was found to be faster with the iPhone keyboard. In addition, we present some reflections on the strengths and weaknesses of the testing methods employed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translation & Interpreting-The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translation & Interpreting-The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12807/TI.109202.2017.A09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translation & Interpreting-The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12807/TI.109202.2017.A09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

Kanjingo是都柏林城市大学(DCU) ADAPT中心(原CNGL)为iOS设备开发的一款后期编辑应用程序。2014年进行了第一阶段的用户测试(O 'Brien, Moorkens & Vreeke, 2014年报道),并根据最初的反馈进行了改进。此摘要描述了基于Kanjingo应用程序的第二次迭代的进一步探索性测试。新测试的设计有几个目的:(1)使用手机键盘测试Kanjingo的后期编辑功能;(2)使用语音输入测试Kanjingo的后期编辑功能;(3)测试Kanjingo对后编辑文本的修改;(4) Kanjingo通用可用性测试;(5)测试Kanjingo界面设计。本文介绍了各种测试的结果、确定的问题和改进的想法。例如,使用Kanjingo进行语音输入的后期编辑,这是测试中与MT交互的最具创新性的形式之一,效果比参与者预期的要好得多,当MT质量非常差时,这种输入模式更适合从头翻译,而使用iPhone键盘编辑短单词或短语的后期编辑速度更快。此外,我们对所采用的测试方法的优缺点进行了一些反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing interaction with a Mobile MT post-editing app
Kanjingo is a post-editing application for iOS devices developed at the ADAPT Centre (formerly CNGL) at Dublin City University (DCU). The first stage of user testing was conducted in 2014 (reported in O’Brien, Moorkens & Vreeke, 2014), and improvements were made based on the initial feedback. This abstract describes further exploratory testing based on the second iteration of the Kanjingo application. The new tests were designed with several aims: (1) testing Kanjingo for post-editing using the phone’s keyboard (2) testing Kanjingo for post-editing with voice input; (3) testing Kanjingo for revision of post-edited texts; (4) testing Kanjingo general usability; and (5) testing Kanjingo interface design. This paper presents the results of the various tests, issues identified, and ideas for improvements. For example, the use of Kanjingo for post-editing with voice input, one of the most innovative forms of interaction with MT in the test, worked much better than participants expected, and this mode of input was preferred for translating from scratch when MT quality was very poor, whereas post-editing short words or phrases was found to be faster with the iPhone keyboard. In addition, we present some reflections on the strengths and weaknesses of the testing methods employed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信