特刊简介。城市环境下的土著教育:关键考试和有意义的反应

Q1 Social Sciences
Y. Nesterova, L. Jackson
{"title":"特刊简介。城市环境下的土著教育:关键考试和有意义的反应","authors":"Y. Nesterova, L. Jackson","doi":"10.1080/15595692.2021.2008348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Around the world, colonial and post-colonial practices have systematically harmed Indigenous peoples’ identities, knowledges, value systems, environments, and relationships (Moore & Nesterova, 2020; Nesterova & Jackson, 2019). Despite recent initiatives of state and non-state actors to rebuild and strengthen Indigenous identities and optimize education for Indigenous learners (such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007), Indigenous peoples continue to grapple with economic, social, cultural, and political challenges and barriers. Many remain trapped in the cycle of poverty. Indigenous peoples thus represent one of the most disadvantaged, marginalized, and vulnerable groups in the world today (International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs [IWGIA], 2020). Due to the decline of traditional Indigenous communities, migration of Indigenous people to urban areas to pursue employment and education has intensified in the past few decades. As a result, more Indigenous learners are joining urban schools. However, such schools are traditionally tailored more to the needs of dominant settler populations than to those of Indigenous learners. For Indigenous learners in this context, few, if any, adjustments are made to better meet their needs, as urban Indigenous populations are often assumed to be assimilated into the dominant culture and accustomed to a life separated from their traditional cultures and communities (Bang et al., 2013). Urban education thus tends to overlook Indigenous ethnic, cultural, and linguistic ties. It typically dismisses or discounts Indigenous knowledge. Urban educators rarely appreciate the extent of socioeconomic diversity among Indigenous learners. Nor do they recognize how mainstream schooling and society can negatively affect Indigenous people. Thus, urban education usually fails to respond critically to the legacy of colonial history on Indigenous populations today. Rather than sustaining unjust structures shaped by colonization, urban education should address discriminatory perceptions dominant groups have of Indigenous people and ameliorate the unequal and antagonistic relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities. In this context, Indigenous learners are often viewed through a cultural deficit lens that blames them for their “difference” and aims to “correct” it (Bishop, 2003; Nelson & Hay, 2010). In the process Indigenous learners are exposed to culturally insensitive curricula, textbooks, and pedagogies (Snyder & Nieuwenhuysen, 2010). They also find themselves studying in a tense and taxing environment where they have complex, often hostile relationships with non-Indigenous peers and teachers (Martinez, 2011). In such cases, distrustful relationships between schools and Indigenous communities do not allow collaborations to improve education quality and relevance (De Plevitz, 2007). Indigenous learners feel isolated from both Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities (Graham & Van ZylChavarro, 2016). Their urban education can imply losing their Indigenous identity and sense of belonging (Kamwangamalu, 2016), intergenerational ties, and cultural continuity (McCarty, 2020). For many, such culturally and politically problematic education also restricts their academic progress, and can lead to poor outcomes (Kearney et al., 2014; Weinstein, 2014).","PeriodicalId":39021,"journal":{"name":"Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"1 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the special issue. Indigenous education in urban settings: critical examinations and meaningful responses\",\"authors\":\"Y. Nesterova, L. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15595692.2021.2008348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Around the world, colonial and post-colonial practices have systematically harmed Indigenous peoples’ identities, knowledges, value systems, environments, and relationships (Moore & Nesterova, 2020; Nesterova & Jackson, 2019). Despite recent initiatives of state and non-state actors to rebuild and strengthen Indigenous identities and optimize education for Indigenous learners (such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007), Indigenous peoples continue to grapple with economic, social, cultural, and political challenges and barriers. Many remain trapped in the cycle of poverty. Indigenous peoples thus represent one of the most disadvantaged, marginalized, and vulnerable groups in the world today (International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs [IWGIA], 2020). Due to the decline of traditional Indigenous communities, migration of Indigenous people to urban areas to pursue employment and education has intensified in the past few decades. As a result, more Indigenous learners are joining urban schools. However, such schools are traditionally tailored more to the needs of dominant settler populations than to those of Indigenous learners. For Indigenous learners in this context, few, if any, adjustments are made to better meet their needs, as urban Indigenous populations are often assumed to be assimilated into the dominant culture and accustomed to a life separated from their traditional cultures and communities (Bang et al., 2013). Urban education thus tends to overlook Indigenous ethnic, cultural, and linguistic ties. It typically dismisses or discounts Indigenous knowledge. Urban educators rarely appreciate the extent of socioeconomic diversity among Indigenous learners. Nor do they recognize how mainstream schooling and society can negatively affect Indigenous people. Thus, urban education usually fails to respond critically to the legacy of colonial history on Indigenous populations today. Rather than sustaining unjust structures shaped by colonization, urban education should address discriminatory perceptions dominant groups have of Indigenous people and ameliorate the unequal and antagonistic relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities. In this context, Indigenous learners are often viewed through a cultural deficit lens that blames them for their “difference” and aims to “correct” it (Bishop, 2003; Nelson & Hay, 2010). In the process Indigenous learners are exposed to culturally insensitive curricula, textbooks, and pedagogies (Snyder & Nieuwenhuysen, 2010). They also find themselves studying in a tense and taxing environment where they have complex, often hostile relationships with non-Indigenous peers and teachers (Martinez, 2011). In such cases, distrustful relationships between schools and Indigenous communities do not allow collaborations to improve education quality and relevance (De Plevitz, 2007). Indigenous learners feel isolated from both Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities (Graham & Van ZylChavarro, 2016). Their urban education can imply losing their Indigenous identity and sense of belonging (Kamwangamalu, 2016), intergenerational ties, and cultural continuity (McCarty, 2020). For many, such culturally and politically problematic education also restricts their academic progress, and can lead to poor outcomes (Kearney et al., 2014; Weinstein, 2014).\",\"PeriodicalId\":39021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2021.2008348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2021.2008348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在世界各地,殖民和后殖民的做法系统性地损害了土著人民的身份、知识、价值体系、环境和关系(Moore & Nesterova, 2020;Nesterova & Jackson, 2019)。尽管最近国家和非国家行为体采取了重建和加强土著身份并优化土著学习者教育的举措(如2007年《联合国土著人民权利宣言》),但土著人民仍在努力应对经济、社会、文化和政治方面的挑战和障碍。许多人仍然陷入贫困的恶性循环。因此,土著人民是当今世界上最弱势、最边缘化和最脆弱的群体之一(土著事务国际工作组,2020年)。由于传统土著社区的衰落,过去几十年来,土著居民向城市地区迁移以寻求就业和教育的情况有所加剧。因此,越来越多的土著学习者加入了城市学校。然而,这些学校传统上更多地是针对占主导地位的定居者的需要而不是针对土著学习者的需要。在这种情况下,土著学习者很少(如果有的话)做出调整来更好地满足他们的需求,因为城市土著人口通常被认为被主流文化同化,习惯于与传统文化和社区分离的生活(Bang et al., 2013)。因此,城市教育往往忽视了土著民族、文化和语言的联系。它通常对土著知识不屑一顾。城市教育工作者很少认识到土著学习者的社会经济多样性程度。他们也没有认识到主流教育和社会如何对土著人民产生负面影响。因此,城市教育通常不能批判性地回应殖民历史对今天土著人口的影响。城市教育不应维持殖民化形成的不公正结构,而应解决主导群体对土著人民的歧视看法,并改善土著和非土著社区之间的不平等和敌对关系。在这种情况下,土著学习者往往通过文化赤字的镜头来看待,指责他们的“差异”,并旨在“纠正”它(Bishop, 2003;Nelson & Hay, 2010)。在这个过程中,土著学习者接触到文化不敏感的课程、教科书和教学法(Snyder & Nieuwenhuysen, 2010)。他们还发现自己在一个紧张和繁重的环境中学习,他们与非土著同伴和老师的关系复杂,往往充满敌意(马丁内斯,2011)。在这种情况下,学校和土著社区之间的不信任关系不允许合作提高教育质量和相关性(De Plevitz, 2007)。土著学习者在土著和非土著社区中都感到孤立(Graham & Van ZylChavarro, 2016)。他们的城市教育可能意味着失去他们的土著身份和归属感(Kamwangamalu, 2016),代际联系和文化连续性(McCarty, 2020)。对许多人来说,这种文化和政治上有问题的教育也限制了他们的学业进步,并可能导致不良结果(Kearney et al., 2014;温斯坦,2014)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to the special issue. Indigenous education in urban settings: critical examinations and meaningful responses
Around the world, colonial and post-colonial practices have systematically harmed Indigenous peoples’ identities, knowledges, value systems, environments, and relationships (Moore & Nesterova, 2020; Nesterova & Jackson, 2019). Despite recent initiatives of state and non-state actors to rebuild and strengthen Indigenous identities and optimize education for Indigenous learners (such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007), Indigenous peoples continue to grapple with economic, social, cultural, and political challenges and barriers. Many remain trapped in the cycle of poverty. Indigenous peoples thus represent one of the most disadvantaged, marginalized, and vulnerable groups in the world today (International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs [IWGIA], 2020). Due to the decline of traditional Indigenous communities, migration of Indigenous people to urban areas to pursue employment and education has intensified in the past few decades. As a result, more Indigenous learners are joining urban schools. However, such schools are traditionally tailored more to the needs of dominant settler populations than to those of Indigenous learners. For Indigenous learners in this context, few, if any, adjustments are made to better meet their needs, as urban Indigenous populations are often assumed to be assimilated into the dominant culture and accustomed to a life separated from their traditional cultures and communities (Bang et al., 2013). Urban education thus tends to overlook Indigenous ethnic, cultural, and linguistic ties. It typically dismisses or discounts Indigenous knowledge. Urban educators rarely appreciate the extent of socioeconomic diversity among Indigenous learners. Nor do they recognize how mainstream schooling and society can negatively affect Indigenous people. Thus, urban education usually fails to respond critically to the legacy of colonial history on Indigenous populations today. Rather than sustaining unjust structures shaped by colonization, urban education should address discriminatory perceptions dominant groups have of Indigenous people and ameliorate the unequal and antagonistic relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities. In this context, Indigenous learners are often viewed through a cultural deficit lens that blames them for their “difference” and aims to “correct” it (Bishop, 2003; Nelson & Hay, 2010). In the process Indigenous learners are exposed to culturally insensitive curricula, textbooks, and pedagogies (Snyder & Nieuwenhuysen, 2010). They also find themselves studying in a tense and taxing environment where they have complex, often hostile relationships with non-Indigenous peers and teachers (Martinez, 2011). In such cases, distrustful relationships between schools and Indigenous communities do not allow collaborations to improve education quality and relevance (De Plevitz, 2007). Indigenous learners feel isolated from both Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities (Graham & Van ZylChavarro, 2016). Their urban education can imply losing their Indigenous identity and sense of belonging (Kamwangamalu, 2016), intergenerational ties, and cultural continuity (McCarty, 2020). For many, such culturally and politically problematic education also restricts their academic progress, and can lead to poor outcomes (Kearney et al., 2014; Weinstein, 2014).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education
Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信