科学标准:美国进化论教育的基础

Elizabeth Watts , Georgy S. Levit , Uwe Hoßfeld
{"title":"科学标准:美国进化论教育的基础","authors":"Elizabeth Watts ,&nbsp;Georgy S. Levit ,&nbsp;Uwe Hoßfeld","doi":"10.1016/j.pisc.2016.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Science standards and textbooks have a huge impact on the manner in which evolution is taught in American classrooms. Standards dictate how much time and what points have to be dedicated to the subject in order to prepare students for state-wide assessments, while the textbooks will largely determine how the subject is presented in the classroom. In the United States both standards and textbooks are determined at the state-level through a political process. Currently there is a tremendous amount of pressure arising from anti-evolutionists in the United States to weaken or omit the teaching of evolution despite recommendations from central institutions such as the National Academy of Science. Results from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) showed that not only are American students performing below average, but also that their performance is declining as they scored worse in 2012 than they did in 2010. Interestingly PISA also found that the internal variation within a country is often greater than between countries with a variation of up to 300 points, which is equivalent to seven years of education pointing to the extreme heterogeneous quality of education within a country (<span>OECD, 2012</span>). An implementation of strong standards would not only help to increase the average performance of American students but could also alleviate the vast discrepancy between the highest and lowest scoring groups of American students. Although the <em>Next Generation Science Standards</em> have been in existence since 2013 and <em>A Framework for K-12 Science Education</em> has been available to the public since 2011 many American states still continue to create their own standards that, according to the Fordham study, are well below par (<span>Lerner et al., 2012</span>). Due to the political nature of the adoption procedure of standards and textbooks, there are many opportunities for interested individuals to get involved in the process of improving these fundamental elements of science education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":92112,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in science","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 59-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.08.004","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science standards: The foundation of evolution education in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Watts ,&nbsp;Georgy S. Levit ,&nbsp;Uwe Hoßfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pisc.2016.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Science standards and textbooks have a huge impact on the manner in which evolution is taught in American classrooms. Standards dictate how much time and what points have to be dedicated to the subject in order to prepare students for state-wide assessments, while the textbooks will largely determine how the subject is presented in the classroom. In the United States both standards and textbooks are determined at the state-level through a political process. Currently there is a tremendous amount of pressure arising from anti-evolutionists in the United States to weaken or omit the teaching of evolution despite recommendations from central institutions such as the National Academy of Science. Results from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) showed that not only are American students performing below average, but also that their performance is declining as they scored worse in 2012 than they did in 2010. Interestingly PISA also found that the internal variation within a country is often greater than between countries with a variation of up to 300 points, which is equivalent to seven years of education pointing to the extreme heterogeneous quality of education within a country (<span>OECD, 2012</span>). An implementation of strong standards would not only help to increase the average performance of American students but could also alleviate the vast discrepancy between the highest and lowest scoring groups of American students. Although the <em>Next Generation Science Standards</em> have been in existence since 2013 and <em>A Framework for K-12 Science Education</em> has been available to the public since 2011 many American states still continue to create their own standards that, according to the Fordham study, are well below par (<span>Lerner et al., 2012</span>). Due to the political nature of the adoption procedure of standards and textbooks, there are many opportunities for interested individuals to get involved in the process of improving these fundamental elements of science education.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in science\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 59-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.08.004\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213020916302439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213020916302439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

科学标准和教科书对美国课堂上讲授进化论的方式产生了巨大影响。为了让学生为全州范围的评估做准备,标准规定了在这门学科上花多少时间和哪些知识点,而教科书将在很大程度上决定这门学科在课堂上的呈现方式。在美国,标准和教科书都是通过政治程序在州一级确定的。目前,美国的反进化论者对削弱或省略进化论教学施加了巨大的压力,尽管国家科学院等中央机构提出了建议。国际学生评估项目(PISA)的结果显示,美国学生的表现不仅低于平均水平,而且他们的表现还在下降,2012年的得分比2010年还低。有趣的是,PISA还发现,一个国家内部的差异往往大于国家之间的差异,高达300分,这相当于7年的教育,表明一个国家内部的教育质量是极端异质的(OECD, 2012)。实施严格的标准不仅有助于提高美国学生的平均成绩,而且还可以缓解美国学生中得分最高和最低的群体之间的巨大差距。尽管《下一代科学标准》自2013年以来就存在,《K-12科学教育框架》自2011年以来就向公众开放,但美国许多州仍在继续制定自己的标准,根据福特汉姆的研究,这些标准远低于标准(Lerner et al., 2012)。由于标准和教科书采用过程的政治性质,有兴趣的个人有很多机会参与到改进这些科学教育基本要素的过程中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Science standards: The foundation of evolution education in the United States

Science standards and textbooks have a huge impact on the manner in which evolution is taught in American classrooms. Standards dictate how much time and what points have to be dedicated to the subject in order to prepare students for state-wide assessments, while the textbooks will largely determine how the subject is presented in the classroom. In the United States both standards and textbooks are determined at the state-level through a political process. Currently there is a tremendous amount of pressure arising from anti-evolutionists in the United States to weaken or omit the teaching of evolution despite recommendations from central institutions such as the National Academy of Science. Results from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) showed that not only are American students performing below average, but also that their performance is declining as they scored worse in 2012 than they did in 2010. Interestingly PISA also found that the internal variation within a country is often greater than between countries with a variation of up to 300 points, which is equivalent to seven years of education pointing to the extreme heterogeneous quality of education within a country (OECD, 2012). An implementation of strong standards would not only help to increase the average performance of American students but could also alleviate the vast discrepancy between the highest and lowest scoring groups of American students. Although the Next Generation Science Standards have been in existence since 2013 and A Framework for K-12 Science Education has been available to the public since 2011 many American states still continue to create their own standards that, according to the Fordham study, are well below par (Lerner et al., 2012). Due to the political nature of the adoption procedure of standards and textbooks, there are many opportunities for interested individuals to get involved in the process of improving these fundamental elements of science education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信