{"title":"Sma Negeri 1 Gandapura化学材料基本定律中基于问题的学习(Pbl)模式与思维对与分享(Tps)模式的学生化学学习效果比较研究","authors":"Iing Lukman, Ratna Unaida, Sri Setiawaty","doi":"10.55529/jcpp.22.6.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to see the comparison of learning outcomes between PBL and TPS models. The type of research is quasi experimental research with non equivalent group pretest and posttest design. Sampling techniques in this study using purposive sampling. Sampel in this study is class X IPA1 as experimental class 1 that applies PBL learning model and X IPA2 as an experimental class 2 that applies TPS model which each class numbered 25 students. based on the results of data analysis, the average cognitive learning outcomes obtained in pretest-psttest in experimental class 1 were 24.28 and 71.72 while the average cognitive learning outcomes in Pretest-Posttest in experiment class 2 were 21.00 and 58.00. T-test is conducted by independent sample test using SPSS Software 18.0. significant value (2-tailed) is 0.00 < 0.05 which means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. Based on the research, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference between students taught with PBL and TPS models on basic chemical legal materials.","PeriodicalId":16825,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Community Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Student Chemistry Learning Results Using Problem Based Learning (Pbl) Model and Think Pair and Share (Tps) On Basic Law of Chemistry Materials At Sma Negeri 1 Gandapura\",\"authors\":\"Iing Lukman, Ratna Unaida, Sri Setiawaty\",\"doi\":\"10.55529/jcpp.22.6.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to see the comparison of learning outcomes between PBL and TPS models. The type of research is quasi experimental research with non equivalent group pretest and posttest design. Sampling techniques in this study using purposive sampling. Sampel in this study is class X IPA1 as experimental class 1 that applies PBL learning model and X IPA2 as an experimental class 2 that applies TPS model which each class numbered 25 students. based on the results of data analysis, the average cognitive learning outcomes obtained in pretest-psttest in experimental class 1 were 24.28 and 71.72 while the average cognitive learning outcomes in Pretest-Posttest in experiment class 2 were 21.00 and 58.00. T-test is conducted by independent sample test using SPSS Software 18.0. significant value (2-tailed) is 0.00 < 0.05 which means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. Based on the research, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference between students taught with PBL and TPS models on basic chemical legal materials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Community Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Community Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55529/jcpp.22.6.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55529/jcpp.22.6.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Study of Student Chemistry Learning Results Using Problem Based Learning (Pbl) Model and Think Pair and Share (Tps) On Basic Law of Chemistry Materials At Sma Negeri 1 Gandapura
This study aims to see the comparison of learning outcomes between PBL and TPS models. The type of research is quasi experimental research with non equivalent group pretest and posttest design. Sampling techniques in this study using purposive sampling. Sampel in this study is class X IPA1 as experimental class 1 that applies PBL learning model and X IPA2 as an experimental class 2 that applies TPS model which each class numbered 25 students. based on the results of data analysis, the average cognitive learning outcomes obtained in pretest-psttest in experimental class 1 were 24.28 and 71.72 while the average cognitive learning outcomes in Pretest-Posttest in experiment class 2 were 21.00 and 58.00. T-test is conducted by independent sample test using SPSS Software 18.0. significant value (2-tailed) is 0.00 < 0.05 which means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. Based on the research, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference between students taught with PBL and TPS models on basic chemical legal materials.