基于蒙特卡罗模拟的涂料工厂职业接触BTEX的健康风险概率评估

M. Hosseinzadeh, Rasoul Hemmatjo, Zahra Moutab Sahihazar, S. Galvani, M. Hajaghazadeh
{"title":"基于蒙特卡罗模拟的涂料工厂职业接触BTEX的健康风险概率评估","authors":"M. Hosseinzadeh, Rasoul Hemmatjo, Zahra Moutab Sahihazar, S. Galvani, M. Hajaghazadeh","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2023.2196702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study assessed the health risks of paint industry workers exposed to benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) compounds using a probabilistic approach. Air samples were collected using charcoal tubes according to the NIOSH 1501 method and analyzed by a GC-FID. The EPA risk assessment model was used to assess the lifetime carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks posed by BTEX. A sensitivity analysis was performed to clarify the influence of input parameters on the health risks. In the paint production, paint packing, and thinner packing workshops, the concentration of at least two aromatic compounds exceeded the occupational exposure limit. Ethylbenzene posed greater carcinogenic risks than benzene. The individual and total cancer risk of benzene and ethylbenzene exceeded the 1E–4 level, indicating a definite cancer risk in all workshops of the factory. The mean of total non-cancer risk exceeded the standard (hazard index = 1) in all workshops with xylene as the most contributing aromatics in non-cancer risk. Putty production (428.5), thinner packing (340.79), and spray paint packing (148.45) were the workshops with the greatest hazard index. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylene contributed the most to cancer (73.0%) and non-cancer (87.8%) risks. These findings can help managers better understand BTEX-related risks faced by paint manufacturing workers and the need to control BTEX contamination to reduce health risks below the standard in paint industry.","PeriodicalId":13141,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"859 - 880"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic health risk assessment of occupational exposure to BTEX in a paint manufacturing plant using Monte-Carlo simulation\",\"authors\":\"M. Hosseinzadeh, Rasoul Hemmatjo, Zahra Moutab Sahihazar, S. Galvani, M. Hajaghazadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10807039.2023.2196702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study assessed the health risks of paint industry workers exposed to benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) compounds using a probabilistic approach. Air samples were collected using charcoal tubes according to the NIOSH 1501 method and analyzed by a GC-FID. The EPA risk assessment model was used to assess the lifetime carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks posed by BTEX. A sensitivity analysis was performed to clarify the influence of input parameters on the health risks. In the paint production, paint packing, and thinner packing workshops, the concentration of at least two aromatic compounds exceeded the occupational exposure limit. Ethylbenzene posed greater carcinogenic risks than benzene. The individual and total cancer risk of benzene and ethylbenzene exceeded the 1E–4 level, indicating a definite cancer risk in all workshops of the factory. The mean of total non-cancer risk exceeded the standard (hazard index = 1) in all workshops with xylene as the most contributing aromatics in non-cancer risk. Putty production (428.5), thinner packing (340.79), and spray paint packing (148.45) were the workshops with the greatest hazard index. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylene contributed the most to cancer (73.0%) and non-cancer (87.8%) risks. These findings can help managers better understand BTEX-related risks faced by paint manufacturing workers and the need to control BTEX contamination to reduce health risks below the standard in paint industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"859 - 880\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2196702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2196702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究采用概率方法评估了涂料行业工人接触苯、甲苯、乙苯和二甲苯(BTEX)化合物的健康风险。按照NIOSH 1501方法,用炭管采集空气样本,用气相色谱- fid分析。采用EPA风险评估模型对BTEX终生致癌性和非致癌性风险进行评估。进行敏感性分析以澄清输入参数对健康风险的影响。在油漆生产、油漆包装和稀释剂包装车间中,至少有两种芳香族化合物的浓度超过职业暴露限值。乙苯比苯具有更大的致癌风险。苯和乙苯的个体致癌风险和总致癌风险均超过1E-4水平,表明该工厂所有车间均存在明确的致癌风险。所有车间的总非癌风险均值均超标(危害指数= 1),其中二甲苯为贡献最大的非癌风险芳烃。油灰生产车间(428.5)、薄层包装车间(340.79)、喷漆包装车间(148.45)是危害指数最高的车间。敏感性分析表明,乙苯和二甲苯的浓度对癌症(73.0%)和非癌症(87.8%)的风险贡献最大。这些发现可以帮助管理者更好地了解涂料生产工人面临的与BTEX相关的风险,以及控制BTEX污染的必要性,以将涂料行业的健康风险降低到低于标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probabilistic health risk assessment of occupational exposure to BTEX in a paint manufacturing plant using Monte-Carlo simulation
Abstract This study assessed the health risks of paint industry workers exposed to benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) compounds using a probabilistic approach. Air samples were collected using charcoal tubes according to the NIOSH 1501 method and analyzed by a GC-FID. The EPA risk assessment model was used to assess the lifetime carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks posed by BTEX. A sensitivity analysis was performed to clarify the influence of input parameters on the health risks. In the paint production, paint packing, and thinner packing workshops, the concentration of at least two aromatic compounds exceeded the occupational exposure limit. Ethylbenzene posed greater carcinogenic risks than benzene. The individual and total cancer risk of benzene and ethylbenzene exceeded the 1E–4 level, indicating a definite cancer risk in all workshops of the factory. The mean of total non-cancer risk exceeded the standard (hazard index = 1) in all workshops with xylene as the most contributing aromatics in non-cancer risk. Putty production (428.5), thinner packing (340.79), and spray paint packing (148.45) were the workshops with the greatest hazard index. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylene contributed the most to cancer (73.0%) and non-cancer (87.8%) risks. These findings can help managers better understand BTEX-related risks faced by paint manufacturing workers and the need to control BTEX contamination to reduce health risks below the standard in paint industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信