多专业心脏康复指南的实施:一项试点研究

H.C. Stokes (Research Officer) , D.R. Thompson (Professor of Nursing) , K. Seers (Senior Research Fellow)
{"title":"多专业心脏康复指南的实施:一项试点研究","authors":"H.C. Stokes (Research Officer) ,&nbsp;D.R. Thompson (Professor of Nursing) ,&nbsp;K. Seers (Senior Research Fellow)","doi":"10.1016/S1362-3265(98)80045-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study is concerned with the implementation of nationally developed multiprofessional guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. The objectives of the study were: (1) to compare cardiac rehabilitation in settings: (a) actively receiving guidelines and additional facilitation; (b) actively receiving guidelines; and (c) not actively receiving guidelines; (2) to determine whether there are any differences in the three settings between those centres identified as either low or high providers of cardiac rehabilitation; (3) to identify particular problems associated with the implementation of guidelines in a multiprofessional setting; and (4) to gain feedback from health care workers about the credibility and feasibility of guidelines developed for cardiac rehabilitation. Six centres were randomized into the three groups, and a variety of tools were used, including questionnaires, facilitation, audit and semi-structured interviews. Results show that the national guidelines did not appear to have been utilized, other than in brief discussions. Recommendations include the need for education and training for cardiac rehabilitation staff, the development of a more comprehensive audit tool to help centres examine their performance in relation to the national guidelines, and further exploration of facilitation as a technique for the implementation of guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100334,"journal":{"name":"Coronary Health Care","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 60-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1362-3265(98)80045-X","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The implementation of multiprofessional guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation: a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"H.C. Stokes (Research Officer) ,&nbsp;D.R. Thompson (Professor of Nursing) ,&nbsp;K. Seers (Senior Research Fellow)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1362-3265(98)80045-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study is concerned with the implementation of nationally developed multiprofessional guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. The objectives of the study were: (1) to compare cardiac rehabilitation in settings: (a) actively receiving guidelines and additional facilitation; (b) actively receiving guidelines; and (c) not actively receiving guidelines; (2) to determine whether there are any differences in the three settings between those centres identified as either low or high providers of cardiac rehabilitation; (3) to identify particular problems associated with the implementation of guidelines in a multiprofessional setting; and (4) to gain feedback from health care workers about the credibility and feasibility of guidelines developed for cardiac rehabilitation. Six centres were randomized into the three groups, and a variety of tools were used, including questionnaires, facilitation, audit and semi-structured interviews. Results show that the national guidelines did not appear to have been utilized, other than in brief discussions. Recommendations include the need for education and training for cardiac rehabilitation staff, the development of a more comprehensive audit tool to help centres examine their performance in relation to the national guidelines, and further exploration of facilitation as a technique for the implementation of guidelines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary Health Care\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 60-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1362-3265(98)80045-X\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136232659880045X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136232659880045X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究关注的是在英国实施国家制定的多专业心脏康复指南。该研究的目的是:(1)比较心脏康复的设置:(a)积极接受指导和额外的促进;(b)积极接受准则;(c)不积极接受指导;(2)确定被认定为心脏康复服务水平低或水平高的中心之间的三种设置是否存在差异;(3)确定在多专业环境中实施指导方针的具体问题;(4)获得医护人员对心脏康复指南的可信度和可行性的反馈。六个中心被随机分为三组,并使用了各种工具,包括问卷调查、促进、审计和半结构化访谈。结果表明,除了简短的讨论外,国家准则似乎没有得到利用。建议包括需要对心脏康复工作人员进行教育和培训,开发一种更全面的审计工具,以帮助中心检查其与国家指南有关的表现,并进一步探索促进作为实施指南的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The implementation of multiprofessional guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation: a pilot study

This study is concerned with the implementation of nationally developed multiprofessional guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. The objectives of the study were: (1) to compare cardiac rehabilitation in settings: (a) actively receiving guidelines and additional facilitation; (b) actively receiving guidelines; and (c) not actively receiving guidelines; (2) to determine whether there are any differences in the three settings between those centres identified as either low or high providers of cardiac rehabilitation; (3) to identify particular problems associated with the implementation of guidelines in a multiprofessional setting; and (4) to gain feedback from health care workers about the credibility and feasibility of guidelines developed for cardiac rehabilitation. Six centres were randomized into the three groups, and a variety of tools were used, including questionnaires, facilitation, audit and semi-structured interviews. Results show that the national guidelines did not appear to have been utilized, other than in brief discussions. Recommendations include the need for education and training for cardiac rehabilitation staff, the development of a more comprehensive audit tool to help centres examine their performance in relation to the national guidelines, and further exploration of facilitation as a technique for the implementation of guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信