前景动态与损失优势

Ryoji Sawa, Jiabin Wu
{"title":"前景动态与损失优势","authors":"Ryoji Sawa, Jiabin Wu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2804852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the role of loss-aversion in affecting the long-run equilibria of stochastic evolutionary dynamics. We consider a finite population of loss-averse agents who are repeatedly and randomly matched to play a symmetric two-player normal form game. When an agent revises her strategy, she compares the payoff from each strategy to a reference point. Based on the comparison, she makes a (possibly stochastic) choice. Under the resulting dynamics, called prospect dynamics, risk-dominance is no longer sufficient to guarantee stochastic stability in 2 by 2 coordination games. We propose a stronger concept, loss-dominance: a strategy is loss-dominant if it is both a risk-dominant strategy and a maximin strategy. This concept captures people's psychological needs to avoid not only risks but also losses. In a 2 by 2 coordination game, the state in which all agents play the loss-dominant strategy (if exists) is uniquely stochastically stable under prospect dynamics for any degree of loss-aversion and all types of reference points. We generalize the concept for symmetric two-player normal form games and show that generalized loss-dominance gives a sufficient condition for stochastic stability with loss-averse agents.","PeriodicalId":10477,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospect Dynamic and Loss Dominance\",\"authors\":\"Ryoji Sawa, Jiabin Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2804852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the role of loss-aversion in affecting the long-run equilibria of stochastic evolutionary dynamics. We consider a finite population of loss-averse agents who are repeatedly and randomly matched to play a symmetric two-player normal form game. When an agent revises her strategy, she compares the payoff from each strategy to a reference point. Based on the comparison, she makes a (possibly stochastic) choice. Under the resulting dynamics, called prospect dynamics, risk-dominance is no longer sufficient to guarantee stochastic stability in 2 by 2 coordination games. We propose a stronger concept, loss-dominance: a strategy is loss-dominant if it is both a risk-dominant strategy and a maximin strategy. This concept captures people's psychological needs to avoid not only risks but also losses. In a 2 by 2 coordination game, the state in which all agents play the loss-dominant strategy (if exists) is uniquely stochastically stable under prospect dynamics for any degree of loss-aversion and all types of reference points. We generalize the concept for symmetric two-player normal form games and show that generalized loss-dominance gives a sufficient condition for stochastic stability with loss-averse agents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Social Science eJournal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Social Science eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2804852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2804852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文研究了损失厌恶在影响随机进化动力学的长期均衡中的作用。我们考虑一个有限种群的损失厌恶者,他们被反复和随机匹配来玩一个对称的二人正常博弈。当agent修改策略时,她将每个策略的收益与一个参考点进行比较。基于比较,她做出了一个(可能是随机的)选择。在结果动态下,即前景动态下,风险优势不再足以保证2 × 2协调博弈的随机稳定性。我们提出了一个更强的概念,损失优势:一个战略是损失优势,如果它是风险优势战略和最大化战略。这个概念抓住了人们的心理需求,既要避免风险,也要避免损失。在2 × 2协调博弈中,对于任何程度的损失厌恶和所有类型的参考点,在前景动态下,所有代理都采取损失优势策略(如果存在)的状态是唯一的随机稳定状态。我们推广了对称二人正态对策的概念,并证明了广义损失优势给出了具有损失规避代理的随机稳定性的充分条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospect Dynamic and Loss Dominance
This paper investigates the role of loss-aversion in affecting the long-run equilibria of stochastic evolutionary dynamics. We consider a finite population of loss-averse agents who are repeatedly and randomly matched to play a symmetric two-player normal form game. When an agent revises her strategy, she compares the payoff from each strategy to a reference point. Based on the comparison, she makes a (possibly stochastic) choice. Under the resulting dynamics, called prospect dynamics, risk-dominance is no longer sufficient to guarantee stochastic stability in 2 by 2 coordination games. We propose a stronger concept, loss-dominance: a strategy is loss-dominant if it is both a risk-dominant strategy and a maximin strategy. This concept captures people's psychological needs to avoid not only risks but also losses. In a 2 by 2 coordination game, the state in which all agents play the loss-dominant strategy (if exists) is uniquely stochastically stable under prospect dynamics for any degree of loss-aversion and all types of reference points. We generalize the concept for symmetric two-player normal form games and show that generalized loss-dominance gives a sufficient condition for stochastic stability with loss-averse agents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信