外包银行贷款筛选:第三方贷款担保的经济学

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Chenyu Shan, Dragon Yongjun Tang
{"title":"外包银行贷款筛选:第三方贷款担保的经济学","authors":"Chenyu Shan, Dragon Yongjun Tang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2024425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We derive a model and provide empirical evidence on the role of loan guarantee. Using a proprietary database of third-party loan guarantees, we find strong evidence that guarantors and banks disagree on loan credit risk, which appears puzzling but is consistent with our model predictions. Given the low collateralization and high default risk of guaranteed loans, the divergence in risk assessment results from guarantors taking collateral and over estimating borrower credit quality. Additionally, we show that guarantors and banks share rents from guaranteed loans, supported by the positive relation between guarantee fee and loan rates. Different from existing theories which focus on guarantor information advantage, risk sharing and regulatory arbitrage, our findings suggest that the main rationale for third-party guarantors is to screen SME loans outsourced by lending banks, given guarantors’ comparative advantages in screening small borrowers.","PeriodicalId":41061,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outsourcing Bank Loan Screening: The Economics of Third-Party Loan Guarantees\",\"authors\":\"Chenyu Shan, Dragon Yongjun Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2024425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We derive a model and provide empirical evidence on the role of loan guarantee. Using a proprietary database of third-party loan guarantees, we find strong evidence that guarantors and banks disagree on loan credit risk, which appears puzzling but is consistent with our model predictions. Given the low collateralization and high default risk of guaranteed loans, the divergence in risk assessment results from guarantors taking collateral and over estimating borrower credit quality. Additionally, we show that guarantors and banks share rents from guaranteed loans, supported by the positive relation between guarantee fee and loan rates. Different from existing theories which focus on guarantor information advantage, risk sharing and regulatory arbitrage, our findings suggest that the main rationale for third-party guarantors is to screen SME loans outsourced by lending banks, given guarantors’ comparative advantages in screening small borrowers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2024425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2024425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

我们推导了一个模型,并提供了关于贷款担保作用的经验证据。使用第三方贷款担保的专有数据库,我们发现强有力的证据表明担保人和银行在贷款信用风险方面存在分歧,这似乎令人困惑,但与我们的模型预测一致。由于担保贷款的低抵押性和高违约风险,风险评估的分歧是由于担保人承担抵押和高估借款人信用质量造成的。此外,我们发现担保人和银行从担保贷款中共享租金,担保费用与贷款利率之间存在正相关关系。与现有理论关注担保人信息优势、风险分担和监管套利不同,我们的研究结果表明,鉴于担保人在筛选小额借款人方面的比较优势,第三方担保人的主要理由是筛选贷款银行外包的中小企业贷款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outsourcing Bank Loan Screening: The Economics of Third-Party Loan Guarantees
We derive a model and provide empirical evidence on the role of loan guarantee. Using a proprietary database of third-party loan guarantees, we find strong evidence that guarantors and banks disagree on loan credit risk, which appears puzzling but is consistent with our model predictions. Given the low collateralization and high default risk of guaranteed loans, the divergence in risk assessment results from guarantors taking collateral and over estimating borrower credit quality. Additionally, we show that guarantors and banks share rents from guaranteed loans, supported by the positive relation between guarantee fee and loan rates. Different from existing theories which focus on guarantor information advantage, risk sharing and regulatory arbitrage, our findings suggest that the main rationale for third-party guarantors is to screen SME loans outsourced by lending banks, given guarantors’ comparative advantages in screening small borrowers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信