{"title":"第二次世界大战中大西洋和太平洋的潜艇战和情报:两个对手的比较和教训","authors":"R. Duffey","doi":"10.1080/21533369.2017.1412680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A unique study has been undertaken examining the impact of submarine performance and countermeasures in two different oceans during the Second World War using official declassified data. This analysis is for two distinct zones of combat, using essentially and simultaneously the same offensive technology (submarines) and defensive strategies (intelligence and signal de-coding). It has been previously shown that learning curves are present in the rate of losses in conflicts between opponents. This analysis compares for the first time the performance of German submarines in the Atlantic attacking Allied convoys with that of American submarines operating in the Pacific against Japanese shipping. For these two theatres of conflict, the rates of sinking of target ships are evaluated, which therefore includes the effectiveness of ‘communications intelligence’ (Comint) and ‘decryption intelligence’ (DI). The choice of the relevant risk exposure measure can be derived and proved. Surprisingly, no difference was found in the warfare sinking rates achieved by the submarine fleets operating in these two vastly different oceans. This similarity must be due to common random search and human learning techniques, and not to employing differing Comint and DI technology. This result has significance to present-day warfare studies and to search theory.","PeriodicalId":38023,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Maritime Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"143 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Submarine warfare and intelligence in the Atlantic and Pacific in the Second World War: comparisons and lessons learned for two opponents\",\"authors\":\"R. Duffey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21533369.2017.1412680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A unique study has been undertaken examining the impact of submarine performance and countermeasures in two different oceans during the Second World War using official declassified data. This analysis is for two distinct zones of combat, using essentially and simultaneously the same offensive technology (submarines) and defensive strategies (intelligence and signal de-coding). It has been previously shown that learning curves are present in the rate of losses in conflicts between opponents. This analysis compares for the first time the performance of German submarines in the Atlantic attacking Allied convoys with that of American submarines operating in the Pacific against Japanese shipping. For these two theatres of conflict, the rates of sinking of target ships are evaluated, which therefore includes the effectiveness of ‘communications intelligence’ (Comint) and ‘decryption intelligence’ (DI). The choice of the relevant risk exposure measure can be derived and proved. Surprisingly, no difference was found in the warfare sinking rates achieved by the submarine fleets operating in these two vastly different oceans. This similarity must be due to common random search and human learning techniques, and not to employing differing Comint and DI technology. This result has significance to present-day warfare studies and to search theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Maritime Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"143 - 167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Maritime Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21533369.2017.1412680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Maritime Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21533369.2017.1412680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Submarine warfare and intelligence in the Atlantic and Pacific in the Second World War: comparisons and lessons learned for two opponents
ABSTRACT A unique study has been undertaken examining the impact of submarine performance and countermeasures in two different oceans during the Second World War using official declassified data. This analysis is for two distinct zones of combat, using essentially and simultaneously the same offensive technology (submarines) and defensive strategies (intelligence and signal de-coding). It has been previously shown that learning curves are present in the rate of losses in conflicts between opponents. This analysis compares for the first time the performance of German submarines in the Atlantic attacking Allied convoys with that of American submarines operating in the Pacific against Japanese shipping. For these two theatres of conflict, the rates of sinking of target ships are evaluated, which therefore includes the effectiveness of ‘communications intelligence’ (Comint) and ‘decryption intelligence’ (DI). The choice of the relevant risk exposure measure can be derived and proved. Surprisingly, no difference was found in the warfare sinking rates achieved by the submarine fleets operating in these two vastly different oceans. This similarity must be due to common random search and human learning techniques, and not to employing differing Comint and DI technology. This result has significance to present-day warfare studies and to search theory.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Maritime Research ( JMR ), established by the National Maritime Museum in 1999, focuses on historical enquiry at the intersections of maritime, British and global history. It champions a wide spectrum of innovative research on the maritime past. While the Journal has a particular focus on the British experience, it positions this within broad oceanic and international contexts, encouraging comparative perspectives and interdisciplinary approaches. The journal publishes research essays and reviews around 15-20 new books each year across a broad spectrum of maritime history. All research articles published in this journal undergo rigorous peer review, involving initial editor screening and independent assessment, normally by two anonymous referees.