行人与各种交通工具混合交通的包络定理的提出

Lubing Zou, Tetsuo Yai
{"title":"行人与各种交通工具混合交通的包络定理的提出","authors":"Lubing Zou,&nbsp;Tetsuo Yai","doi":"10.1016/j.eastsj.2021.100050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As machines gradually are introduced in human society and share public spaces with people, achieving human-machine coexistence becomes significant. Previous studies make contributions but are still insufficient to satisfy the needs of mixed traffic when mobilities increase. For dealing with the mixed traffic and ensuring safe and comfortable walking environments of pedestrians, this research proposes a new envelope theorem divided into physical and mental envelopes. The mental envelope (ME) as the focus of this research explains pedestrian perceptions from two perspectives, SME and OME, expanding the traditional interpersonal distance. To preliminarily explore the acceptance of two MEs and compare their differences, we conduct a questionnaire survey. The results show that MEs are accepted by participants, and express different pedestrian perceptions. The responses of subjective priority order showing the differences between SME and OME indicate their possible relationship. These findings would be beneficial to explore the future applications of MEs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100131,"journal":{"name":"Asian Transport Studies","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100050"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2185556021000183/pdfft?md5=1ab50e757a084f4c644e6e1e53c9dc95&pid=1-s2.0-S2185556021000183-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A proposal of envelope theorem on the mixed traffic of pedestrians and various mobilities\",\"authors\":\"Lubing Zou,&nbsp;Tetsuo Yai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eastsj.2021.100050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As machines gradually are introduced in human society and share public spaces with people, achieving human-machine coexistence becomes significant. Previous studies make contributions but are still insufficient to satisfy the needs of mixed traffic when mobilities increase. For dealing with the mixed traffic and ensuring safe and comfortable walking environments of pedestrians, this research proposes a new envelope theorem divided into physical and mental envelopes. The mental envelope (ME) as the focus of this research explains pedestrian perceptions from two perspectives, SME and OME, expanding the traditional interpersonal distance. To preliminarily explore the acceptance of two MEs and compare their differences, we conduct a questionnaire survey. The results show that MEs are accepted by participants, and express different pedestrian perceptions. The responses of subjective priority order showing the differences between SME and OME indicate their possible relationship. These findings would be beneficial to explore the future applications of MEs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Transport Studies\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2185556021000183/pdfft?md5=1ab50e757a084f4c644e6e1e53c9dc95&pid=1-s2.0-S2185556021000183-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Transport Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2185556021000183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Transport Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2185556021000183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着机器逐渐进入人类社会,与人类共享公共空间,实现人机共存变得非常重要。以往的研究有一定的贡献,但仍不足以满足流动性增加时混合交通的需求。为了应对混合交通,保证行人安全舒适的行走环境,本研究提出了一种新的包络定理,分为物理包络和心理包络。心理包络(ME)作为本研究的重点,从中小企业和OME两个角度解释了行人的感知,扩大了传统的人际距离。为了初步探讨两种微信的接受程度并比较其差异,我们进行了问卷调查。结果表明,微信号被参与者所接受,并表达了不同的行人感知。中小企业与中小企业在主观优先顺序上的差异反映了它们之间可能存在的关系。这些发现将有助于探索微机械的未来应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A proposal of envelope theorem on the mixed traffic of pedestrians and various mobilities

As machines gradually are introduced in human society and share public spaces with people, achieving human-machine coexistence becomes significant. Previous studies make contributions but are still insufficient to satisfy the needs of mixed traffic when mobilities increase. For dealing with the mixed traffic and ensuring safe and comfortable walking environments of pedestrians, this research proposes a new envelope theorem divided into physical and mental envelopes. The mental envelope (ME) as the focus of this research explains pedestrian perceptions from two perspectives, SME and OME, expanding the traditional interpersonal distance. To preliminarily explore the acceptance of two MEs and compare their differences, we conduct a questionnaire survey. The results show that MEs are accepted by participants, and express different pedestrian perceptions. The responses of subjective priority order showing the differences between SME and OME indicate their possible relationship. These findings would be beneficial to explore the future applications of MEs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信