麦肯齐技术与瑞士球运动及热敷对腰痛患者的比较效果

Komal Jamil, Rida Baqir
{"title":"麦肯齐技术与瑞士球运动及热敷对腰痛患者的比较效果","authors":"Komal Jamil, Rida Baqir","doi":"10.37185/lns.1.1.338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the effects of the McKenzie technique with Swiss ball exercises for low back pain management.Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the Department of Physical Therapy Patel Hospital Karachi, Pakistan, from May 2018 to November 2018.Materials and Methods: A total number of 50 patients with low back pain from the age of 18-40 years were included in the study. Research participants were divided into 2 groups. Group A comprised 25 participants who performed the McKenzie exercises and Group B comprised 25 participants who performed the Swiss ball exercises. In both groups, a heating pad was applied for 20 minutes before exercise interventions. Research participants were evaluated from a numeric rating scale and the Oswestry disability index questionnaire. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 21.Result: The results showed there is a significant effect of McKenzie Exercises in the management of low back pain; the results were evaluated by the differences in the numeric rating scale (P= 0.016) and the Oswestry disability index (P= 0.026) between Pre and Post application of the intervention. The McKenzie numeric rating scale pretreatment mean is 4.48 with(S.D+0.58), the numeric rating scale post-treatment mean is 2.84 with (S.D +1.625), and the McKenzie pretreatment Oswestry disability index mean is 24.87 with (S.D +24.87) and post-treatment Oswestry disability index mean is 16.96 with (S.D +16.96).Conclusion: McKenzie’s technique showed a more beneficial effect than the Swiss ball exercises in patients with low back pain.","PeriodicalId":15254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biology and Life Science","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparative Effects of McKenzie Technique versus Swiss Ball Exercises Along with Hot Pack in Patients with Low Back Pain\",\"authors\":\"Komal Jamil, Rida Baqir\",\"doi\":\"10.37185/lns.1.1.338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the effects of the McKenzie technique with Swiss ball exercises for low back pain management.Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the Department of Physical Therapy Patel Hospital Karachi, Pakistan, from May 2018 to November 2018.Materials and Methods: A total number of 50 patients with low back pain from the age of 18-40 years were included in the study. Research participants were divided into 2 groups. Group A comprised 25 participants who performed the McKenzie exercises and Group B comprised 25 participants who performed the Swiss ball exercises. In both groups, a heating pad was applied for 20 minutes before exercise interventions. Research participants were evaluated from a numeric rating scale and the Oswestry disability index questionnaire. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 21.Result: The results showed there is a significant effect of McKenzie Exercises in the management of low back pain; the results were evaluated by the differences in the numeric rating scale (P= 0.016) and the Oswestry disability index (P= 0.026) between Pre and Post application of the intervention. The McKenzie numeric rating scale pretreatment mean is 4.48 with(S.D+0.58), the numeric rating scale post-treatment mean is 2.84 with (S.D +1.625), and the McKenzie pretreatment Oswestry disability index mean is 24.87 with (S.D +24.87) and post-treatment Oswestry disability index mean is 16.96 with (S.D +16.96).Conclusion: McKenzie’s technique showed a more beneficial effect than the Swiss ball exercises in patients with low back pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biology and Life Science\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biology and Life Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37185/lns.1.1.338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biology and Life Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37185/lns.1.1.338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较麦肯齐技术与瑞士球运动治疗腰痛的效果。研究设计:准实验研究。研究地点和时间:该研究于2018年5月至2018年11月在巴基斯坦卡拉奇帕特尔医院物理治疗部进行。材料与方法:选取年龄在18-40岁的腰痛患者50例。研究参与者被分为两组。A组有25名参与者进行麦肯齐练习,B组有25名参与者进行瑞士球练习。在两组中,在运动干预前使用加热垫20分钟。研究参与者通过数字评定量表和Oswestry残疾指数问卷进行评估。数据采用SPSS version 21进行分析。结果:麦肯锡运动对腰痛的治疗有显著效果;采用干预前后数值评定量表(P= 0.016)和Oswestry残疾指数(P= 0.026)的差异对结果进行评价。McKenzie数值评定量表预处理均值为4.48,(S.D+0.58);治疗后数值评定量表均值为2.84,(S.D+ 1.625);治疗前Oswestry残疾指数均值为24.87,(S.D+ 24.87);治疗后Oswestry残疾指数均值为16.96,(S.D+ 16.96)。结论:对于腰痛患者,McKenzie技术比瑞士球运动更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Comparative Effects of McKenzie Technique versus Swiss Ball Exercises Along with Hot Pack in Patients with Low Back Pain
Objective: To compare the effects of the McKenzie technique with Swiss ball exercises for low back pain management.Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the Department of Physical Therapy Patel Hospital Karachi, Pakistan, from May 2018 to November 2018.Materials and Methods: A total number of 50 patients with low back pain from the age of 18-40 years were included in the study. Research participants were divided into 2 groups. Group A comprised 25 participants who performed the McKenzie exercises and Group B comprised 25 participants who performed the Swiss ball exercises. In both groups, a heating pad was applied for 20 minutes before exercise interventions. Research participants were evaluated from a numeric rating scale and the Oswestry disability index questionnaire. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 21.Result: The results showed there is a significant effect of McKenzie Exercises in the management of low back pain; the results were evaluated by the differences in the numeric rating scale (P= 0.016) and the Oswestry disability index (P= 0.026) between Pre and Post application of the intervention. The McKenzie numeric rating scale pretreatment mean is 4.48 with(S.D+0.58), the numeric rating scale post-treatment mean is 2.84 with (S.D +1.625), and the McKenzie pretreatment Oswestry disability index mean is 24.87 with (S.D +24.87) and post-treatment Oswestry disability index mean is 16.96 with (S.D +16.96).Conclusion: McKenzie’s technique showed a more beneficial effect than the Swiss ball exercises in patients with low back pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信