设计研究的逻辑

Q2 Social Sciences
Matthew W. Easterday, Daniel G. Rees Lewis, E. Gerber
{"title":"设计研究的逻辑","authors":"Matthew W. Easterday, Daniel G. Rees Lewis, E. Gerber","doi":"10.1080/23735082.2017.1286367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the first descriptions of design research (DR), there have been calls to better define it to increase its rigour. Yet five uncertainties remain: (1) the processes for conducting DR, (2) how DR differs from other forms of research, (3) how DR differs from design, (4) the products of DR, and (5) why DR can answer certain research questions more effectively than other methodologies. To resolve these uncertainties, we define educational design research as a meta-methodology conducted by education researchers to create practical interventions and theoretical design models through a design process of focusing, understanding, defining, conceiving, building, testing, and presenting, that recursively nests other research processes to iteratively search for empirical solutions to practical problems of human learning. By better articulating the logic of DR, researchers can more effectively craft, communicate, replicate, and teach DR as a useful and defensible research methodology.","PeriodicalId":52244,"journal":{"name":"Learning: Research and Practice","volume":"74 1","pages":"131 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The logic of design research\",\"authors\":\"Matthew W. Easterday, Daniel G. Rees Lewis, E. Gerber\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23735082.2017.1286367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Since the first descriptions of design research (DR), there have been calls to better define it to increase its rigour. Yet five uncertainties remain: (1) the processes for conducting DR, (2) how DR differs from other forms of research, (3) how DR differs from design, (4) the products of DR, and (5) why DR can answer certain research questions more effectively than other methodologies. To resolve these uncertainties, we define educational design research as a meta-methodology conducted by education researchers to create practical interventions and theoretical design models through a design process of focusing, understanding, defining, conceiving, building, testing, and presenting, that recursively nests other research processes to iteratively search for empirical solutions to practical problems of human learning. By better articulating the logic of DR, researchers can more effectively craft, communicate, replicate, and teach DR as a useful and defensible research methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning: Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"131 - 160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"77\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning: Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1286367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1286367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

摘要

自设计研究(DR)的第一次描述以来,一直有人呼吁更好地定义它以增加其严谨性。然而,仍然存在五个不确定性:(1)进行DR的过程,(2)DR与其他形式的研究有何不同,(3)DR与设计有何不同,(4)DR的产品,以及(5)为什么DR可以比其他方法更有效地回答某些研究问题。为了解决这些不确定性,我们将教育设计研究定义为教育研究人员通过聚焦、理解、定义、构思、构建、测试和呈现的设计过程来创建实际干预和理论设计模型的元方法论,并递归地嵌套其他研究过程,迭代地寻找人类学习实际问题的经验解决方案。通过更好地阐明DR的逻辑,研究人员可以更有效地设计、交流、复制DR,并将DR作为一种有用的、可辩护的研究方法来教授。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The logic of design research
ABSTRACT Since the first descriptions of design research (DR), there have been calls to better define it to increase its rigour. Yet five uncertainties remain: (1) the processes for conducting DR, (2) how DR differs from other forms of research, (3) how DR differs from design, (4) the products of DR, and (5) why DR can answer certain research questions more effectively than other methodologies. To resolve these uncertainties, we define educational design research as a meta-methodology conducted by education researchers to create practical interventions and theoretical design models through a design process of focusing, understanding, defining, conceiving, building, testing, and presenting, that recursively nests other research processes to iteratively search for empirical solutions to practical problems of human learning. By better articulating the logic of DR, researchers can more effectively craft, communicate, replicate, and teach DR as a useful and defensible research methodology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning: Research and Practice
Learning: Research and Practice Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信