两州学校水平RAMP状况的多变量方差分析

Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21501378.2019.1575696

Emily C. Goodman-Scott, Julia V. Taylor, Michael T. Kalkbrenner, Jennifer Darsie, R. Barbosa, Kaitlin M. Walsh, Allison K Worth

{"title":"两州学校水平RAMP状况的多变量方差分析","authors":"Emily C. Goodman-Scott, Julia V. Taylor, Michael T. Kalkbrenner, Jennifer Darsie, R. Barbosa, Kaitlin M. Walsh, Allison K Worth","doi":"10.1080/21501378.2019.1575696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Due to a dearth of research, authors conducted an ex post facto research design to investigate group differences in school-level student outcomes (e.g., achievement, suspension, and attendance rates) based on Recognized American School Counselor Association Model Program (RAMP) status. Archival data were collected from publically accessible data provided by state Departments of Education. Authors included all RAMP schools in Georgia and Virginia (n = 70) over a 5-year period. Propensity score matching was used to construct a comparison group of non-RAMP schools (n = 70) matched by district, ethnicity, and free or reduced-price lunch status. The results of multivariate analyses of variance did not reveal statistically significant differences by RAMP status based on school-level student outcomes. Authors suggest further research methods to investigate the impact of RAMP status, including the use of an ecological framework for viewing such research.","PeriodicalId":37884,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","volume":"46 1","pages":"31 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multivariate Analysis of Variance Investigation of School-Level RAMP Status Across Two States\",\"authors\":\"Emily C. Goodman-Scott, Julia V. Taylor, Michael T. Kalkbrenner, Jennifer Darsie, R. Barbosa, Kaitlin M. Walsh, Allison K Worth\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21501378.2019.1575696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Due to a dearth of research, authors conducted an ex post facto research design to investigate group differences in school-level student outcomes (e.g., achievement, suspension, and attendance rates) based on Recognized American School Counselor Association Model Program (RAMP) status. Archival data were collected from publically accessible data provided by state Departments of Education. Authors included all RAMP schools in Georgia and Virginia (n = 70) over a 5-year period. Propensity score matching was used to construct a comparison group of non-RAMP schools (n = 70) matched by district, ethnicity, and free or reduced-price lunch status. The results of multivariate analyses of variance did not reveal statistically significant differences by RAMP status based on school-level student outcomes. Authors suggest further research methods to investigate the impact of RAMP status, including the use of an ecological framework for viewing such research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"31 - 44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2019.1575696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2019.1575696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

由于缺乏研究，作者进行了一项事后研究设计，以美国公认学校辅导员协会模式计划(RAMP)为基础，调查学校水平学生成果(如成绩、停学率和出勤率)的群体差异。档案数据是从州教育部门提供的可公开访问的数据中收集的。作者纳入了乔治亚州和弗吉尼亚州的所有RAMP学校(n = 70)，为期5年。使用倾向得分匹配来构建非ramp学校(n = 70)按地区、种族和免费或减价午餐状态匹配的对照组。多变量方差分析的结果并没有显示基于学校水平学生结果的RAMP状态的统计学显著差异。作者建议进一步研究RAMP状态的影响，包括使用生态框架来看待此类研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Multivariate Analysis of Variance Investigation of School-Level RAMP Status Across Two States

Abstract Due to a dearth of research, authors conducted an ex post facto research design to investigate group differences in school-level student outcomes (e.g., achievement, suspension, and attendance rates) based on Recognized American School Counselor Association Model Program (RAMP) status. Archival data were collected from publically accessible data provided by state Departments of Education. Authors included all RAMP schools in Georgia and Virginia (n = 70) over a 5-year period. Propensity score matching was used to construct a comparison group of non-RAMP schools (n = 70) matched by district, ethnicity, and free or reduced-price lunch status. The results of multivariate analyses of variance did not reveal statistically significant differences by RAMP status based on school-level student outcomes. Authors suggest further research methods to investigate the impact of RAMP status, including the use of an ecological framework for viewing such research.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as: treatment efficacy, clinical diagnosis, program evaluation, research design, outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories: Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.