谁在支持谁?:质量、团队效率和感知组织支持

John C Howes , Russell Cropanzano , Alicia A Grandey , Carolyn J Mohler
{"title":"谁在支持谁?:质量、团队效率和感知组织支持","authors":"John C Howes ,&nbsp;Russell Cropanzano ,&nbsp;Alicia A Grandey ,&nbsp;Carolyn J Mohler","doi":"10.1016/S1084-8568(01)00021-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using a multifoci approach, we explored the relation of perceived support to worker attitudes, citizenship behaviors, and quality team performance. By expanding previous theoretical models, we formulated three foci of support: an organization's support for an individual (<em>S</em><sub>O→I</sub>), a quality team's support for an individual (<em>S</em><sub>T→I</sub>), and an organization's support for a quality team (<em>S</em><sub>O→T</sub>). Hypotheses were tested with 136 participants of 25 quality teams. As expected, <em>S</em><sub>O→I</sub> was the best predictor of organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions from the organization. <em>S</em><sub>T→I</sub> was the best predictor of individual levels of team commitment, team satisfaction, turnover intentions from the team, and group cohesion. Finally, <em>S</em><sub>O→T</sub> was the best predictor of team performance. Contrary to expectations, none of the support foci predicted citizenship behaviors. Results are discussed in terms of the ability of these three foci to expand the domain of perceived support and to guide managers in the development of more effective quality improvement teams.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quality Management","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 207-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1084-8568(01)00021-9","citationCount":"72","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who is supporting whom?: quality team effectiveness and perceived organizational support\",\"authors\":\"John C Howes ,&nbsp;Russell Cropanzano ,&nbsp;Alicia A Grandey ,&nbsp;Carolyn J Mohler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1084-8568(01)00021-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using a multifoci approach, we explored the relation of perceived support to worker attitudes, citizenship behaviors, and quality team performance. By expanding previous theoretical models, we formulated three foci of support: an organization's support for an individual (<em>S</em><sub>O→I</sub>), a quality team's support for an individual (<em>S</em><sub>T→I</sub>), and an organization's support for a quality team (<em>S</em><sub>O→T</sub>). Hypotheses were tested with 136 participants of 25 quality teams. As expected, <em>S</em><sub>O→I</sub> was the best predictor of organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions from the organization. <em>S</em><sub>T→I</sub> was the best predictor of individual levels of team commitment, team satisfaction, turnover intentions from the team, and group cohesion. Finally, <em>S</em><sub>O→T</sub> was the best predictor of team performance. Contrary to expectations, none of the support foci predicted citizenship behaviors. Results are discussed in terms of the ability of these three foci to expand the domain of perceived support and to guide managers in the development of more effective quality improvement teams.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Quality Management\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 207-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1084-8568(01)00021-9\",\"citationCount\":\"72\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Quality Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084856801000219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084856801000219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

摘要

采用多焦点方法,我们探讨了感知支持与员工态度、公民行为和高质量团队绩效的关系。通过扩展先前的理论模型,我们制定了三个支持焦点:组织对个人的支持(SO→I),质量团队对个人的支持(ST→I),以及组织对质量团队的支持(SO→T)。我们对来自25个质量团队的136名参与者进行了假设测试。正如预期的那样,SO→I是组织承诺、工作满意度和组织离职意向的最佳预测因子。ST→I是团队承诺、团队满意度、团队离职意向和团队凝聚力个人水平的最佳预测因子。最后,SO→T是团队绩效的最佳预测因子。与预期相反,没有一个支持焦点预测公民行为。根据这三个焦点的能力来讨论结果,以扩大感知支持的领域,并指导管理人员发展更有效的质量改进团队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who is supporting whom?: quality team effectiveness and perceived organizational support

Using a multifoci approach, we explored the relation of perceived support to worker attitudes, citizenship behaviors, and quality team performance. By expanding previous theoretical models, we formulated three foci of support: an organization's support for an individual (SO→I), a quality team's support for an individual (ST→I), and an organization's support for a quality team (SO→T). Hypotheses were tested with 136 participants of 25 quality teams. As expected, SO→I was the best predictor of organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions from the organization. ST→I was the best predictor of individual levels of team commitment, team satisfaction, turnover intentions from the team, and group cohesion. Finally, SO→T was the best predictor of team performance. Contrary to expectations, none of the support foci predicted citizenship behaviors. Results are discussed in terms of the ability of these three foci to expand the domain of perceived support and to guide managers in the development of more effective quality improvement teams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信