随钻电阻率工具在大角度水平井最大油藏接触井中的响应建模及其对含水饱和度计算的重要影响——以中东某大型碳酸盐岩油田为例

H. Yin, M. Nicholis, Ahmed Al Teneiji, N. Aboud, A. Salem
{"title":"随钻电阻率工具在大角度水平井最大油藏接触井中的响应建模及其对含水饱和度计算的重要影响——以中东某大型碳酸盐岩油田为例","authors":"H. Yin, M. Nicholis, Ahmed Al Teneiji, N. Aboud, A. Salem","doi":"10.2118/197896-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Resistivity is one of the most important log that is required in water saturation (Sw) calculation, reservoir characterization, field assessment and hydrocarbon production. However, borehole environmental and borehole-to-bedding geometric effects on LWD propagation resistivity logs are inevitable. For instance, severe \"polarization horn\" responses from LWD propagation resistivity logs are commonly encounted in High-Angle & Horizontal (HAHZ) wells near bed boundaries with high resistivity contrast. These \"polarization horns\" in LWD propagation resistivity responses in HAHZ wells are not accurate resistivity profile, and consequently, impacts Sw calculation.\n In this paper, an innovative LWD propagation resistivity Tool-Response-Modeling (TRM) workflow has been developed and applied to six typical Maximum Reservoir Contact (MRC) wells drilled in a giant carbonate field in Middle East. The inverted resistivity profiles along the well path result in more accurate resistivity and, hence, more accurate Sw calculations (as compared to capillary pressure- and core-based Sw calculations). Additionally, TRM results yield new insights on to both maintain the well in the target formation and reduce these \"polarization horn\" responses during geosteering operations. The case studies demonstrated that TRM and this workflow has an important and critical roles in accurate Sw calculation, formation evaluation and field assessment, and hydrocarbon production.","PeriodicalId":11328,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LWD Resistivity Tool Response Modeling in High Angle and Horizontal Maximum Reservoir Contact Wells and its Significant Impact on Water Saturation Calculation: Case Study in a Giant Carbonate Field in Middle East\",\"authors\":\"H. Yin, M. Nicholis, Ahmed Al Teneiji, N. Aboud, A. Salem\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/197896-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Resistivity is one of the most important log that is required in water saturation (Sw) calculation, reservoir characterization, field assessment and hydrocarbon production. However, borehole environmental and borehole-to-bedding geometric effects on LWD propagation resistivity logs are inevitable. For instance, severe \\\"polarization horn\\\" responses from LWD propagation resistivity logs are commonly encounted in High-Angle & Horizontal (HAHZ) wells near bed boundaries with high resistivity contrast. These \\\"polarization horns\\\" in LWD propagation resistivity responses in HAHZ wells are not accurate resistivity profile, and consequently, impacts Sw calculation.\\n In this paper, an innovative LWD propagation resistivity Tool-Response-Modeling (TRM) workflow has been developed and applied to six typical Maximum Reservoir Contact (MRC) wells drilled in a giant carbonate field in Middle East. The inverted resistivity profiles along the well path result in more accurate resistivity and, hence, more accurate Sw calculations (as compared to capillary pressure- and core-based Sw calculations). Additionally, TRM results yield new insights on to both maintain the well in the target formation and reduce these \\\"polarization horn\\\" responses during geosteering operations. The case studies demonstrated that TRM and this workflow has an important and critical roles in accurate Sw calculation, formation evaluation and field assessment, and hydrocarbon production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/197896-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197896-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

电阻率测井是含水饱和度(Sw)计算、储层表征、油田评价和油气生产中最重要的测井资料之一。然而,井眼环境和井眼-层间几何效应对随钻传播电阻率测井的影响是不可避免的。例如,在靠近地层边界的高电阻率对比的高角度水平(HAHZ)井中,LWD传播电阻率测井数据通常会出现严重的“极化喇叭”响应。在HAHZ井中,随钻测井传播电阻率响应中的这些“极化角”并不是准确的电阻率曲线,因此会影响Sw的计算。本文开发了一种创新的随钻传播电阻率工具-响应建模(TRM)工作流程,并将其应用于中东某大型碳酸盐岩油田的6口典型最大油藏接触面(MRC)井。沿着井眼轨迹反演的电阻率曲线可以获得更精确的电阻率,因此也可以获得更精确的Sw计算(与基于毛细管压力和岩心的Sw计算相比)。此外,TRM结果还提供了新的见解,既可以保持井在目标地层中,又可以减少地质导向作业期间的“极化喇叭”响应。案例研究表明,TRM及其工作流程在精确计算地层渗透率、地层评价和现场评价以及油气生产中发挥着重要而关键的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LWD Resistivity Tool Response Modeling in High Angle and Horizontal Maximum Reservoir Contact Wells and its Significant Impact on Water Saturation Calculation: Case Study in a Giant Carbonate Field in Middle East
Resistivity is one of the most important log that is required in water saturation (Sw) calculation, reservoir characterization, field assessment and hydrocarbon production. However, borehole environmental and borehole-to-bedding geometric effects on LWD propagation resistivity logs are inevitable. For instance, severe "polarization horn" responses from LWD propagation resistivity logs are commonly encounted in High-Angle & Horizontal (HAHZ) wells near bed boundaries with high resistivity contrast. These "polarization horns" in LWD propagation resistivity responses in HAHZ wells are not accurate resistivity profile, and consequently, impacts Sw calculation. In this paper, an innovative LWD propagation resistivity Tool-Response-Modeling (TRM) workflow has been developed and applied to six typical Maximum Reservoir Contact (MRC) wells drilled in a giant carbonate field in Middle East. The inverted resistivity profiles along the well path result in more accurate resistivity and, hence, more accurate Sw calculations (as compared to capillary pressure- and core-based Sw calculations). Additionally, TRM results yield new insights on to both maintain the well in the target formation and reduce these "polarization horn" responses during geosteering operations. The case studies demonstrated that TRM and this workflow has an important and critical roles in accurate Sw calculation, formation evaluation and field assessment, and hydrocarbon production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信