数学教师运用循证教学实践的知识、态度和实践

Q3 Social Sciences
Edrian Peter Balela Villanueva, M. Prudente
{"title":"数学教师运用循证教学实践的知识、态度和实践","authors":"Edrian Peter Balela Villanueva, M. Prudente","doi":"10.1145/3514262.3514266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent results from national and international standardized examinations in Mathematics have pushed the Philippines Department of Education (DepEd) to revisit the instructional approaches used in the Filipino classrooms. One of the recommendations of DepEd is the use of evidence-based instructional practices (EBIPs). However, little is known regarding the factors that influence Filipino mathematics teachers’ implementation of a certain teaching strategy. The main objective of this current study is to find out whether mathematics teachers’ knowledge and attitudes predict their practice of EBIPs. This descriptive study involved 114 teacher-respondents from one district in Laguna. Data were gathered using a researchers-made questionnaire distributed online using Google forms. Findings revealed that 47.5% of mathematics teachers, in general, are knowledgeable of EBIPs while 36.57% of the respondents have misconceptions about EBIPs. In addition, it was found that, generally, they have a positive attitude towards EBIPs (M = 3.63, SD = 0.51). The result also showed that the respondents employ EBIPs in their classrooms to a moderate extent (M = 3.19, SD = 0.46). Teacher-respondents reported that they are satisfied with the implementation of a teaching strategy when a strategy is beneficial for the learners’ holistic development and helps improve the pedagogical process. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that mathematics teachers’ attitude towards EBIPs and misconception of EBIPs predict their use of the evidence-based practice. Findings indicate the there is a need to correct these misconceptions through proper information dissemination of EBIPs.","PeriodicalId":37324,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in using Evidence-based Instructional Practices\",\"authors\":\"Edrian Peter Balela Villanueva, M. Prudente\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3514262.3514266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent results from national and international standardized examinations in Mathematics have pushed the Philippines Department of Education (DepEd) to revisit the instructional approaches used in the Filipino classrooms. One of the recommendations of DepEd is the use of evidence-based instructional practices (EBIPs). However, little is known regarding the factors that influence Filipino mathematics teachers’ implementation of a certain teaching strategy. The main objective of this current study is to find out whether mathematics teachers’ knowledge and attitudes predict their practice of EBIPs. This descriptive study involved 114 teacher-respondents from one district in Laguna. Data were gathered using a researchers-made questionnaire distributed online using Google forms. Findings revealed that 47.5% of mathematics teachers, in general, are knowledgeable of EBIPs while 36.57% of the respondents have misconceptions about EBIPs. In addition, it was found that, generally, they have a positive attitude towards EBIPs (M = 3.63, SD = 0.51). The result also showed that the respondents employ EBIPs in their classrooms to a moderate extent (M = 3.19, SD = 0.46). Teacher-respondents reported that they are satisfied with the implementation of a teaching strategy when a strategy is beneficial for the learners’ holistic development and helps improve the pedagogical process. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that mathematics teachers’ attitude towards EBIPs and misconception of EBIPs predict their use of the evidence-based practice. Findings indicate the there is a need to correct these misconceptions through proper information dissemination of EBIPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3514262.3514266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3514262.3514266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

菲律宾国内和国际数学标准化考试的最新结果促使菲律宾教育部(DepEd)重新审视菲律宾课堂上使用的教学方法。DepEd的建议之一是使用循证教学实践(EBIPs)。然而,对菲律宾数学教师实施某种教学策略的影响因素却知之甚少。本研究的主要目的是了解数学教师的知识和态度是否能预测他们的ebip实践。这项描述性研究涉及来自拉古纳一个地区的114名教师。数据是通过研究人员制作的调查问卷收集的,调查问卷使用谷歌表格在线分发。调查结果显示,总体而言,47.5%的数学教师对EBIPs有所了解,而36.57%的受访者对EBIPs存在误解。此外,我们发现,他们普遍对EBIPs持积极态度(M = 3.63, SD = 0.51)。调查结果还显示,被调查者在课堂上使用EBIPs的程度适中(M = 3.19, SD = 0.46)。教师受访者表示,当教学策略有利于学习者的全面发展并有助于改善教学过程时,他们对教学策略的实施感到满意。逐步多元回归分析表明,数学教师对EBIPs的态度和对EBIPs的误解预测了他们对循证实践的使用。研究结果表明,有必要通过适当的ebip信息传播来纠正这些误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in using Evidence-based Instructional Practices
The recent results from national and international standardized examinations in Mathematics have pushed the Philippines Department of Education (DepEd) to revisit the instructional approaches used in the Filipino classrooms. One of the recommendations of DepEd is the use of evidence-based instructional practices (EBIPs). However, little is known regarding the factors that influence Filipino mathematics teachers’ implementation of a certain teaching strategy. The main objective of this current study is to find out whether mathematics teachers’ knowledge and attitudes predict their practice of EBIPs. This descriptive study involved 114 teacher-respondents from one district in Laguna. Data were gathered using a researchers-made questionnaire distributed online using Google forms. Findings revealed that 47.5% of mathematics teachers, in general, are knowledgeable of EBIPs while 36.57% of the respondents have misconceptions about EBIPs. In addition, it was found that, generally, they have a positive attitude towards EBIPs (M = 3.63, SD = 0.51). The result also showed that the respondents employ EBIPs in their classrooms to a moderate extent (M = 3.19, SD = 0.46). Teacher-respondents reported that they are satisfied with the implementation of a teaching strategy when a strategy is beneficial for the learners’ holistic development and helps improve the pedagogical process. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that mathematics teachers’ attitude towards EBIPs and misconception of EBIPs predict their use of the evidence-based practice. Findings indicate the there is a need to correct these misconceptions through proper information dissemination of EBIPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信